Follow us on social

Why today's gang violence in Ecuador shouldn't shock you

Why today's gang violence in Ecuador shouldn't shock you

But the response could make it even worse

Latin America

The world was shocked in the last few weeks as drug gangs turned Ecuador from being a relatively stable, increasingly democratic Andean republic, into an apparent narco-state.

Ecuadorians are, for the first time, seeing their country fall under the control of criminal gangs, a fate previously only reserved to some of its other Latin American neighbors.

The recent surge seemingly started on August 9 last year, when Fernando Villavicencio, a presidential candidate outspoken about gang violence and corruption, was murdered by cartel hitmen in Quito, the national capital.

By that time, Ecuador was experiencing a surge in gang activity and violent crime, seeing its homicide rate go from 5.84 per 100,000 in 2017 (on the lower-end in the region) to 25.9 per 100,000, according to last year’s data, with that number likely to increase in 2024, according to Ecuadorian police that project a 66 percent hike in homicides this year. Ecuador is on the verge of surpassing all other South American nations’ homicide rates — with Colombia now set for second place — all in record time.

On October 15, Daniel Noboa, a former banana tycoon now president of the country, was elected on a platform centered around “fixing” gang violence in Ecuador. With 87 percent of Ecuadorians perceiving a rise in gang violence, and most cities now facing daily gang conflicts, a solution couldn’t come any quicker. However, soon after taking office, Noboa quickly declared a “state of exception,” suspending civil liberties and due process in favor of bolder police and military action.

In the last week, two major gang leaders have escaped from prison, Alfoso Macias of the Los Choneros gang, and Fabricio Colon Pico of the Los Lobos group, both major gangs within Ecuador. This week, criminals armed with grenades and firearms took a TV crew hostage in their studio, at the same time that prison guards and police officers were also taken as hostages by a drug gang in another part of the country.

In response, Noboa declared the situation an “internal armed conflict” and deployed the Ecuadorian military in the streets and expanded the security state’s powers to “fight” gangs.

So, why is gang violence surging, and why doesn’t a war against the cartels work?

The ongoing criminal crisis in Ecuador is, first and foremost, a direct result of the always-rising demand for drugs in (mostly) rich countries. As long as there is demand for drugs, and those drugs remain illegal, there will be gangs willing to provide them. Consumption of illicit narcotics has been increasing since the start of the war on drugs more than 50 years ago, and, with demand comes supply. In Mexico and Bolivia, for instance, the growing U.S. demand for heroin and cocaine led to the quick rise in poppy cultivation and heroin and cocaine production. If that demand is not addressed, it will keep rising, and drug cartels will keep producing.

Second, there is an observable balloon effect. As gangs from Colombia, Mexico, Brazil, Venezuela, and other neighboring countries were pushed out by dwindling local drug markets, competing gangs, and government actions, a significant portion has ended up in Ecuador, which was, until somewhat recently, very much untouched by major drug cartels. For example, the notoriously violent Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang, began popping up in Ecuador in the last year. The same has happened with Mexican and Colombian gangs now in Quito and Guayaquíl.

Another impact factor is the militarized approach to the “war on drugs” itself. Violence begets violence, and, unfortunately, Noboa's state of exception may just make things worse. Noboa’s predecessor, Guillermo Lasso, pushed for police and military intervention against drug gangs, leading to more gang breakups and further violence. Embracing a violent approach will only create more narco gangs, as they encourage drug gangs to split up and engage in direct confrontations with the state and other gangs.

By doing so, Noboa embraced demonstrably failed policies of some of his predecessors and contemporaries. These include Felipe Calderón in Mexico, Álvaro Uribe in Colombia, and Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil. All of them expanded police and military powers against drug gangs while facing a surge in violence, only to see that violence and insecurity increase as a result of their policies.

These policies have left millions dead and displaced in the last five decades, while the region continues to be taken hostage by drug gangs, as quality of life and civil liberties dwindle.

If governments are unable to address the root cause of gang formation, namely socio-economic conditions and the demand for illegal drugs in wealthier countries, drug gangs will continue to develop. As more gangs develop, the government will respond with more violence and the suspension of liberties, leading to more deaths and repression. The root causes won't be addressed, and the cycle will repeat itself.

Sadly, with no sign of Noboa or any major politician in Ecuador being willing or able to change their approach, the cycle of violence will likely continue, if not escalate.


CNN/Screengrab

Latin America
Daniel Davis
Top photo credit: Ret. Lt. Col. Daniel Davis (FOX Business screenshot)

Mr. Trump, you would've been lucky to have Dan Davis on your team

QiOSK

Earlier today the Jewish Insider magazine ran a story saying that the White House tapped retired Lt. Col. Danny Davis for Deputy Director of National Intelligence, working under the newly confirmed DNI Tulsi Gabbard. It was a hit piece by a pro-Israel platform that primarily focused on Davis's critical views — published only in articles and on his popular podcast — on Gaza and Iran.

Within hours, he was informed there would be no job, Responsible Statecraft has confirmed. "Investigative journalist" Laura Loomer celebrated. We are sure neoconservative radio jock Mark Levin, who helped spread the Insider story to his 4.9 million followers on Wednesday, celebrated. We should not. President Trump should not.

keep readingShow less
Adam Smith
Top image credit: https://www.youtube.com/@QuincyInst

Top House Dem: Party's embrace of hawks 'is a problem'

QiOSK

A senior Democratic lawmaker on Wednesday said it was ‘a problem’ that many in his party have been trying to out-hawk Republicans on foreign policy and that Democrats need to be more aggressive in advocating for diplomacy approaches abroad, particularly with respect to China.

During a discussion hosted by the Quincy Institute — RS’s publisher — with House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash), QI executive vice president Trita Parsi wondered why — pointing to Vice President Kamala Harris campaigning for president with Liz Cheney and Sen. Elissa Slotkin’s (D-Mich.) recent embrace of Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy — the Democratic Party has shifted away from promoting diplomacy, opposing “stupid wars,” and celebrating multilateralism.

keep readingShow less
Zelensky Putin
Top photo credit: Volodymyr Zelensky (Shutterstock/Pararazza) and Vladimir Putin (Shutterstock/miss.cabul)

No, a ceasefire is not a ‘bad deal’ for Russia

Europe

The Trump administration has so far played its cards in the Ukraine peace process with great skill. Pressure on Kyiv has led the Ukrainian government to abandon its impossible demands and join the U.S. in calling for an unconditional temporary ceasefire.

This call, together with the resumption of U.S. military and intelligence aid to Ukraine, is now putting great pressure on the Russian government to abandon its own impossible demands and seek a genuine and early compromise. A sign of the intensity of this pressure is the anguish it is causing to Russian hardliners, who are demanding that Putin firmly reject the proposal. We must hope that he will not listen to them.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.