Follow us on social

The US is making a very big deal over Chinese 'interceptions'. Why?

The US is making a very big deal over Chinese 'interceptions'. Why?

It seems like an odd way to make nice before Xi-Biden summit.

Analysis | Asia-Pacific

A flurry of freshly released footage of apparent Chinese air interceptions further complicates the troubled U.S.-China relationship, casting an even larger pall on the upcoming summit between President Joe Biden and Chinese leader Xi Jinping in San Francisco.

The Pentagon has released a spate of photos and footage it says shows interceptions of U.S. military aircraft by Chinese pilots. "Since the fall of 2021, we have seen more than 180 such incidents: More in the past two years than in the decade before that," said Ely Ratner, the assistant secretary of defense for Indo-Pacific security affairs, in a Defense Department statement earlier this week.

"That's nearly 200 cases where PLA operators have performed reckless maneuvers, or discharged chaff, or shot off flares, or approached too rapidly or too close to U.S. aircraft,” Ratner added.

The images and videos were released in the run-up to the Defense Department’s upcoming annual report on China’s military power. And, they come amid continued efforts by the Biden administration to restore channels of military communications with China that were severed by Beijing after former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s 2022 visit to Taiwan — something referenced in the DOD press statement.

“As this is happening, Chinese military officials refuse repeated U.S. requests to open lines of communication between the two countries,” the Pentagon said, highlighting appeals by Navy Adm. John Aquilino, the commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, to open back up. "I have yet to have one of those requests accepted," Aquilino said. "I look forward to speaking to my counterparts. I think developing that relationship would be critical to maintaining the peace and stability in the region."

The accent placed by the press release on the necessity of bilateral dialogue suggests that the intercept revelations may be partially intended as an attempt by the Biden administration to pressure Beijing into reopening those lines. Aerial interceptions, including those that involve close contact between aircraft belonging to different militaries, are not uncommon, but Ratner said there has been an alarming uptick in such activity since the fall of 2021.

The Pentagon’s concerns come even as officials make plans for a face-to-face meeting between Biden and Xi next month in San Francisco. The sit-down is unlikely to yield a substantial rapprochement between the U.S. and China or to result in the elusive reset in bilateral relations previously sought by the Biden administration. Instead, the meeting appears to be aimed more at establishing ground rules in the mounting global competition between Washington and Beijing and promoting mutual “stability,” a term frequently used by White House officials to describe the administration’s China policy.

The interception footage is the latest instance in ongoing attempts by both sides to enter the high-stakes talks between the world’s two largest economies from a position of strength. Xi met with Russian President Vladimir Putin, whom he described as his “dear friend,” earlier this week at Beijing’s Belt and Road Forum. The conference, which drew scores of participants from the global south, reflects China’s ongoing bid to position itself as a key voice on issues pertaining to the developing world and to advance a vision of multipolarity that is starkly at odds with Washington.

“Viewing others’ development as a threat or taking economic interdependence as a risk will not make one’s own life better or speed up one’s development,” said Xi in a thinly-veiled reference to the U.S. during his opening remarks.

More than setting the tone, the Pentagon’s framing of its interception claims may offer a preview of Biden’s agenda for the meeting. Top officials including Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin have repeatedly and unsuccessfully urged Beijing to reopen lines of military communication. The Pentagon’s Tuesday statement suggests that reestablishing military dialogue will be one of Biden’s core objectives in the upcoming November summit.

China, for its part, appears to be using the military dialogue issue as leverage to extract concessions from Washington in other areas. “The U.S. side is surely aware of why there is difficulty in military-to-military exchanges,” Chinese Diplomat Yang Tao said following Blinken’s visit to China earlier this year. “One of the reasons is unilateral sanctions against the Chinese side. They first need to remove impediments and create conditions for military-to-military cooperation.”

Yet the White House is in no hurry to provide the concessions Beijing appears to be seeking, instead taking new steps to tighten the economic screws on China. The Biden administration unveiled updated export controls on Tuesday aimed at further restricting China’s access to certain types of semiconductors, the latest broadside in a widening chip war with China.

“These controls maintain our clear focus on military applications and confront the threats to our national security posed by the PRC government’s military-civil fusion strategy,” said U.S. secretary of commerce Gina Raimondo.

Each side has something the other wants, but it remains to be seen if even partial compromise is possible in the context of an increasingly hostile bilateral relationship. The November Biden-Xi summit, if it takes place, will be the biggest test yet of the administration’s effort to establish a working model of sustainable, managed competition with China.


Images and video newly released by the Department capture a PLA fighter jet "in the course of conducting a coercive and risky intercept against a lawfully operating U.S. asset in the East China Sea," according to the DOD. (Courtesy of Indo-Pacom)
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
Iran nuclear
Top image credit: Inspired by maps via shutterstock.com

How the US could use Iran's uranium enrichment to its own advantage

Middle East

Since mid-April, Iran and the United States held numerous rounds of nuclear negotiations that have made measured progress — until Washington abruptly stated that Iran had no right to enrich uranium. Moreover, 200 members of the U.S. Congress sent president Trump a letter opposing any deal that would allow Iran to retain uranium enrichment capability.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei called U.S. demands “excessive and outrageous” and “nonsense.” Since the beginning of the Iranian nuclear crisis in 2003, Tehran has drawn a clear red line: the peaceful right to enrich uranium under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is non-negotiable.

keep readingShow less
american military missiles
Top photo credit: Fogcatcher/Shutterstock

5 ways the military industrial complex is a killer

Latest 3

Congress is on track to finish work on the fiscal year 2025 Pentagon budget this week, and odds are that it will add $150 billion to its funding for the next few years beyond what the department even asked for. Meanwhile, President Trump has announced a goal of over $1 trillion for the Pentagon for fiscal year 2026.

With these immense sums flying out the door, it’s a good time to take a critical look at the Pentagon budget, from the rationales given to justify near record levels of spending to the impact of that spending in the real world. Here are five things you should know about the Pentagon budget and the military-industrial complex that keeps the churn going.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig

Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Africa

Recent weeks events have dramatically cast the Sudanese civil war back into the international spotlight, drawing renewed scrutiny to the role of external actors, particularly the United Arab Emirates.

This shift has been driven by Sudan's accusations at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against the UAE concerning violations of the Genocide Convention, alongside drone strikes on Port Sudan that Khartoum vociferously attributes to direct Emirati participation. Concurrently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly reaffirmed the UAE's deep entanglement in the conflict at a Senate hearing last week.

From Washington, another significant and sudden development also surfaced last week: the imposition of U.S. sanctions on the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) for alleged chemical weapons use. This dramatic accusation was met by an immediate denial from Sudan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which vehemently dismissed the claims as "unfounded" and criticized the U.S. for bypassing the proper international mechanisms, specifically the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, despite Sudan's active membership on its Executive Council.

Despite the gravity of such an accusation, corroboration for the use of chemical agents in Sudan’s war remains conspicuously absent from public debate or reporting, save for a January 2025 New York Times article citing unnamed U.S. officials. That report itself contained a curious disclaimer: "Officials briefed on the intelligence said the information did not come from the United Arab Emirates, an American ally that is also a staunch supporter of the R.S.F."

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.