Follow us on social

google cta
Diplomacy Watch: Putin fights to keep friends in Africa

Diplomacy Watch: Putin fights to keep friends in Africa

As African leaders gather in St. Petersburg, the benefits of working with the Kremlin appear more limited than ever.

Europe
google cta
google cta

Russian officials kicked off the Russia-Africa Summit on Thursday, with delegations from across the continent coming to St. Petersburg for the event. The meeting drew only 17 heads of state, a sharp drop from the 43 African leaders who attended the 2019 version.

The Kremlin blamed Western pressure for the weak showing, but it’s hard to ignore how recent Russian actions have strained Moscow’s relationship with Africa. Just last week, Russian President Vladimir Putin pulled out of a deal that allowed exports of Ukrainian grains from Black Sea ports, a decision that risks driving up food prices worldwide. If ripping up the agreement wasn’t enough, Putin followed up by shelling Ukrainian port cities in an apparent effort to deter shipping companies from testing Russia’s commitment to the blockade.

At the same time, the status of the Wagner Group — a Russian mercenary organization with extensive operations in Africa — is unclear following a mutiny and attempted march on Moscow last month. And recent African attempts to jumpstart peace negotiations in Ukraine have gotten a frosty reception from the Kremlin.

The timing puts African leaders in a difficult position. Many have chosen to keep a neutral stance toward the war in Ukraine, but so far they have gotten little in return besides a Russian commitment to maintain the grain deal and facilitate access to Wagner’s troops. Now, as African leaders gather in St. Petersburg, the benefits of working with the Kremlin appear more limited than ever.

Russia, eager to bolster its allies on the continent, has tried to play down the impact of pulling out of the Black Sea deal by promising free grain to countries in need. But African leaders want clear commitments that the global flow of grain — and global prices for staple foods — will not be affected, according to Reuters.

Perhaps the biggest question to watch coming out of the conference is whether Putin will make any new statements regarding potential negotiations to end the war in Ukraine. Movement on that front would make a big difference for leaders like South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, who faces enormous political pressure at home to distance himself from Russia.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba embarked on his third African tour since the conflict began, with stops in Liberia and Equatorial Guinea. Kuleba’s message was clear: Putin doesn’t care about Africa.

“Russia's objective is to provoke the increase of [a] global food crisis, export its own grain without any hindrances and make as much money as they can,” he told France 24 on Tuesday. “Russia will fill its pockets to fund [its] war machine, at the expense of Africa.”

In other diplomatic news related to the war in Ukraine:

— Putin has rejected a U.S. offer to discuss the war, but lower-level meetings between U.S. foreign policy elites and Russian officials have been taking place at least twice a month, according to an anonymous former U.S. official involved in the talks, the Moscow Times reports. The former official said they had also visited Moscow “at least every three months” since the war began and argued that the biggest sticking point for Russian leaders is that “they don't know how to define victory or defeat.” The anonymous ex-official said one goal of the meetings was to communicate that the U.S. is “prepared to work constructively with Russian national security concerns.” The reporting adds new details to previous revelations about meetings between Russian leaders and former U.S. officials, suggesting that the United States is seeking secretive, less formal pathways to discuss the conflict — and a potential path to ending it — with Moscow.

— Ukraine has become littered with an “unprecedented” number of mines, according to the Washington Post. Roughly 30 percent of the country is now contaminated with unexploded ordnance, a problem that will require decades of effort to solve. It will also require a lot of cash: The World Bank estimates that Ukraine will need $37.4 billion over the next decade to support its demining work, adding yet another cost for reconstructing the country after the war ends.

— President Joe Biden hosted Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni at the White House Thursday in the clearest indication yet that the administration is willing to overlook Meloni’s far-right views due to her steadfast support for Ukraine, according to the Washington Post. Meloni has “earned a reputation as someone Washington and Brussels can do business with,” standing in sharp contrast with other far-right leaders like Hungarian President Viktor Orban. Her wide acceptance in the West has assuaged previous concerns that the rise of the hard right in Italy would splinter Western support for Kyiv.

U.S. State Department news:

In a Monday press conference, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said Ukraine has “everything it needs to conduct” its counteroffensive. “We have supplied them with an enormous amount of military equipment, as have our allies and partners both in Europe and around the world, and we will continue to do so,” Miller said.


google cta
Europe
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports
Top image credit: A large oil tanker transits the Strait of Hormuz. (Shutterstock/ Clare Louise Jackson)

Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports

QiOSK

Hours after the U.S. and Israel launched a campaign of airstrikes across Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is warning vessels in the Persian Gulf via radio that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a report from Reuters.

The news suggests that Iran is ready to pull out all the stops in its response to the U.S.-Israeli barrage, which President Donald Trump says is aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. A full shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz would cause an international crisis given that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the narrow channel. Financial analysts estimate that even one day of a full blockade could cause global oil prices to double from $66 per barrel to more than $120.

keep readingShow less
What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means
Top image credit: FILE PHOTO: Afghan Taliban fighters patrol near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak, Kandahar Province, following exchanges of fire between Pakistani and Afghan forces in Afghanistan, October 15, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer

What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means

QiOSK

Pakistan’s airstrikes on Kabul and Kandahar over the last 24 hours are nothing new. Islamabad has carried out strikes inside Afghanistan several times since the Taliban’s return to power. Pakistan claimed that the Afghan Taliban used drones to conduct strikes in Pakistan.

What distinguishes this latest episode is the rhetorical escalation, with Pakistani officials openly referring to the action as “open war.” While the language grabbed international headlines, it is best understood as part of a managed escalation designed to signal resolve without crossing red lines that would make de-escalation impossible.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.