Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1321274198-scaled

House Democrats call on Biden administration to rethink Venezuela policy

Letter signed by twelve members acknowledges shortcomings of sanctions strategy.

Washington Politics

A group of House Democrats are urging the Biden administration to rethink its policy toward Venezuela and adopt measures that would ease the ongoing economic and political crises in the country.

NBC news reported on Thursday that the House members sent a letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen asking to consider conditions under which they would consider lifting certain sectoral or secondary sanctions and re-establishing “limited” diplomatic relations with Nicolás Maduro’s government.

A number of prominent Democrats, including the ranking member of the House Foreign Relations Committee, Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.); the ranking member of the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, Joaquin Castro (D-Texas); and the ranking member of the House Rules Committee, Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), were among the letter’s twelve signatories. 

“Given the high costs of the crisis for the Venezuelan people and the hemisphere broadly, we believe it is imperative that the Administration respond to this opportunity by empowering the Venezuelan people who are seeking to rebuild their country and their future,” reads the letter.

The Biden administration has offered Venezuela minor sanctions relief — permitting Chevron to resume operations in the country — in an effort to bring President Nicolas Maduro back to the negotiating table with opposition leaders. U.S. officials have signaled a willingness to lift more sanctions if Maduro is willing to engage in good-faith talks. “We are more than ready to reduce and ultimately end our sanctions pressures, but it will take concrete, meaningful steps and ultimately free and fair elections in order to get to that,” Deputy National Security Advisor Jon Finer told reporters in April, after attending a summit organized by the Colombian government aimed at jumpstarting negotiations in Venezuela.

“As Members of Congress who are deeply concerned by the ongoing political, human rights and humanitarian crises in Venezuela, we welcome the Administration’s shift away from the punitive ‘maximum pressure’ policy implemented by former President Trump towards limited reengagement with the government of Nicolas Maduro,” the letter’s signatories say. At the same time, they argue that the administration should “pursue a better strategy to address the rollback of democracy and the severe violations of fundamental rights committed by the Maduro government.”

The latest letter to Biden follows one sent last month by another group of Democratic lawmakers who urged the president to reverse Trump-era sanctions on both Venezuela and Cuba, identifying the economic damage caused by sanctions as one of the primary drivers of the ongoing migration crisis. That letter set up a clash with Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who “vehemently” disagreed that sanctions have been a leading contributor to high levels of emigration from the two Caribbean basin nations. 

“For his part, President Biden has been unwilling to antagonize Menendez because of his important position, and prior to last year’s midterms the White House was reluctant to take any actions that might politically hurt Democratic candidates in Florida,” wrote Daniel Larison in Responsible Statecraft at the time. “Despite considerable evidence that broad sanctions are both destructive and useless, the administration has acted as if they are harmless and effective.” 

This week’s letter reiterates some of the same concerns regarding the humanitarian impact of broad-based sanctions. Sanctions, according to the missive, “have often been found to be ineffective in achieving their objectives.” “[T]o purposefully continue contributing to economic hardship experienced by an entire population,” it added, “is immoral and unworthy of the United States.”

“This is the strongest language about collective punishment sanctions ever written” by a Foreign Affairs Committee ranking member, said Just Foreign Policy on Twitter. 


Julio Lovera / Shutterstock.com
Washington Politics
Gaza ceasefire
Top photo credit: A Palestinian boy walks in front of an Israeli rocket in the street in Gaza City, Palestine, on October 30, 2025. Israel says it strikes an arms dump in Gaza on October 29, hours after the deadliest night of bombing since the start of a US-brokered truce, warning it will continue to operate to take out perceived threats. (Photo by Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto)

The Gaza ceasefire is falling apart

Middle East

Even a limited pause in the unspeakable suffering that residents of the Gaza Strip have endured for two years is welcome, and thus it is unsurprising that the deal on Gaza that was reached in early October was widely and mistakenly termed a “peace agreement.”

The deal was instead a prisoner exchange and limited ceasefire. It came about because the slaughter and starvation of Gazans had gone so far that Hamas was willing to give up its scant leverage in the form of the remaining Israeli hostages. With their release, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu removed the main immediate domestic source of opposition to his policies, while the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) got a needed break before resuming operations.

keep readingShow less
POGO The Bunker
Top image credit: Project on Government Oversight

Are American 'boomers' at risk?

Military Industrial Complex

The Bunker appears originally at the Project on Government Oversight and is republished here with permission.


keep readingShow less
Nuclear explosion
Top image credit: Let’s curb loose talk of using lower-yield nuclear weapons

Reckless posturing: Trump says he wants to resume nuke testing

Global Crises

President Donald Trump’s October 29 announcement that the United States will restart nuclear weapons testing after more than 30 years marks a dangerous turning point in international security.

The decision lacks technical justification and appears solely driven by geopolitical posturing.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.