Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1321274198-scaled

House Democrats call on Biden administration to rethink Venezuela policy

Letter signed by twelve members acknowledges shortcomings of sanctions strategy.

Washington Politics

A group of House Democrats are urging the Biden administration to rethink its policy toward Venezuela and adopt measures that would ease the ongoing economic and political crises in the country.

NBC news reported on Thursday that the House members sent a letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen asking to consider conditions under which they would consider lifting certain sectoral or secondary sanctions and re-establishing “limited” diplomatic relations with Nicolás Maduro’s government.

A number of prominent Democrats, including the ranking member of the House Foreign Relations Committee, Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.); the ranking member of the Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, Joaquin Castro (D-Texas); and the ranking member of the House Rules Committee, Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), were among the letter’s twelve signatories. 

“Given the high costs of the crisis for the Venezuelan people and the hemisphere broadly, we believe it is imperative that the Administration respond to this opportunity by empowering the Venezuelan people who are seeking to rebuild their country and their future,” reads the letter.

The Biden administration has offered Venezuela minor sanctions relief — permitting Chevron to resume operations in the country — in an effort to bring President Nicolas Maduro back to the negotiating table with opposition leaders. U.S. officials have signaled a willingness to lift more sanctions if Maduro is willing to engage in good-faith talks. “We are more than ready to reduce and ultimately end our sanctions pressures, but it will take concrete, meaningful steps and ultimately free and fair elections in order to get to that,” Deputy National Security Advisor Jon Finer told reporters in April, after attending a summit organized by the Colombian government aimed at jumpstarting negotiations in Venezuela.

“As Members of Congress who are deeply concerned by the ongoing political, human rights and humanitarian crises in Venezuela, we welcome the Administration’s shift away from the punitive ‘maximum pressure’ policy implemented by former President Trump towards limited reengagement with the government of Nicolas Maduro,” the letter’s signatories say. At the same time, they argue that the administration should “pursue a better strategy to address the rollback of democracy and the severe violations of fundamental rights committed by the Maduro government.”

The latest letter to Biden follows one sent last month by another group of Democratic lawmakers who urged the president to reverse Trump-era sanctions on both Venezuela and Cuba, identifying the economic damage caused by sanctions as one of the primary drivers of the ongoing migration crisis. That letter set up a clash with Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who “vehemently” disagreed that sanctions have been a leading contributor to high levels of emigration from the two Caribbean basin nations. 

“For his part, President Biden has been unwilling to antagonize Menendez because of his important position, and prior to last year’s midterms the White House was reluctant to take any actions that might politically hurt Democratic candidates in Florida,” wrote Daniel Larison in Responsible Statecraft at the time. “Despite considerable evidence that broad sanctions are both destructive and useless, the administration has acted as if they are harmless and effective.” 

This week’s letter reiterates some of the same concerns regarding the humanitarian impact of broad-based sanctions. Sanctions, according to the missive, “have often been found to be ineffective in achieving their objectives.” “[T]o purposefully continue contributing to economic hardship experienced by an entire population,” it added, “is immoral and unworthy of the United States.”

“This is the strongest language about collective punishment sanctions ever written” by a Foreign Affairs Committee ranking member, said Just Foreign Policy on Twitter. 


Julio Lovera / Shutterstock.com
Washington Politics
Trump steve Bannon
Top photo credit: President Donald Trump (White House/Flickr) and Steve Bannon (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)

Don't read the funeral rites for MAGA restraint yet

Washington Politics

On the same night President Donald Trump ordered U.S. airstrikes against Iran, POLITICO reported, “MAGA largely falls in line on Trump’s Iran strikes.”

The report cited “Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and critic of GOP war hawks,” who posted on X, “Iran gave President Trump no choice.” It noted that former Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz, a longtime Trump supporter, “said on X that the president’s strike didn’t necessarily portend a larger conflict.” Gaetz said. “Trump the Peacemaker!”

keep readingShow less
Nato Summit Trump
Top photo credit: NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, President Donald Trump, at the 2025 NATO Summit in The Hague (NATO/Flickr)

Did Trump just dump the Ukraine War into the Europeans' lap?

Europe

The aerial war between Israel and Iran over the past two weeks sucked most of the world’s attention away from the war in Ukraine.

The Hague NATO Summit confirms that President Donald Trump now sees paying for the war as Europe’s problem. It’s less clear that he will have the patience to keep pushing for peace.

keep readingShow less
Antonio Guterres and Ursula von der Leyen
Top image credit: Alexandros Michailidis / Shutterstock.com

UN Charter turns 80: Why do Europeans mock it so?

Europe

Eighty years ago, on June 26, 1945, the United Nations Charter was signed in San Francisco. But you wouldn’t know it if you listened to European governments today.

After two devastating global military conflicts, the Charter explicitly aimed to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.” And it did so by famously outlawing the use of force in Article 2(4). The only exceptions were to be actions taken in self-defense against an actual or imminent attack and missions authorized by the U.N. Security Council to restore collective security.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.