Follow us on social

google cta
Original

Update: Tit-for-tat attack after US launches airstrikes in Syria

This comes within days of failed attempts by lawmakers to strip the White House of blanket authorities and to bring American troops home.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

UPDATE 3/25: There are news reports Saturday that at least two U.S. facilities in Syria were under attack late Friday, a day after the U.S. launched airstrikes against Iranian Revolutionary Guard targets in the eastern part of the country.

According to ABC News and Al Jazeera, U.S. officials said there were attacks on two facilities in Deir ez-Zor Province in eastern Syria — one involved drones, the other involved rockets. The drones were shot down (one reportedly made it through), but the rocket attack at the other U.S. facility left one American servicemember wounded and in stable condition.

There have been around 80 such attacks reported against U.S. troops in Syria since 2021.


The Defense Department said late Thursday that it had launched a series of airstrikes in eastern Syria after a drone attack killed one U.S. contractor and injured five soldiers operating on a coalition base in northeastern Syria. An additional U.S. contractor was also hurt in the attack.

According to a statement by Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, the Americans conducted precision airstrikes in eastern Syria against facilities used by Iran's Revolutionary Guard (IRGC).

"At the direction of President Biden, I authorized U.S. Central Command forces to conduct precision airstrikes tonight in eastern Syria against facilities used by groups affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC)," he said. "The airstrikes were conducted in response to today’s attack as well as a series of recent attacks against Coalition forces in Syria by groups affiliated with the IRGC."

These precision strikes, said the DoD, "are intended to protect and defend U.S. personnel. The United States took proportionate and deliberate action intended to limit the risk of escalation and minimize casualties."

The statement said the intelligence community had determined that the drone had been of "Iranian origin," but did not say why the IRGC had been pinpointed as responsible for the attacks.

As of December, there were 900 U.S. troops in the country where they continue to conduct operations against ISIS but have been targeted for years now by what U.S. officials say are Iranian-backed militias.

According to CBS News, the American strikes reportedly killed six Iranian-backed fighters at an arms depot in the Harabesh neighborhood in the eastern city of Deir el-Zour, another two fighters in Mayadeen, and a strike hit a military post near the town of Boukamal along the border with Iraq. CBS was relying on the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights and these reports could not be independently verified.

According to Reuters, the Iranians are denying any deaths connected to the U.S. airstrikes:

Iran's state Press TV, saying no Iranian had been killed in the attack, quoted local sources as denying the target was an Iran-aligned military post, but that a rural development center and a grain center near a military airport were hit.

It said: "A military source in Syria told Press TV that the resistance groups reserve their right to respond to the American attack and will take reciprocal action."

In early March Gen. Mark Milley, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, made a surprise visit to the troops in Syria, where the U.S. has had a military presence for eight years. He tied the mission there to the security of the U.S. and said the risk of keeping troops there was "worth" the "enduring defeat of ISIS and continuing to support our friends and allies in the region."

Not everyone thinks that mission is as clear and the risk as important. Recently Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) offered a bill for vote in the House that would bring U.S. troops home from the region. Even with help from the Congressional Progressive Caucus and other Republicans, it failed 321-103 on March 8.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has also tried in recent says to push a measure that would repeal the 2001 AUMF which he says is used to justify operations there, as well as a number of other overseas interventions since the law was passed in the wake of 9/11, 20 years ago. He says it should be up to Congress whether to continue these operations, not the sole authority of the White House. His amendment failed 86-9 in the Senate on Thursday.


U.S. Northern Command personnel move medical supplies for distribution at New York's Javits Medical Station as part of the U.S. military's COVID-19 response (U.S. Army Photo by Pvt. 1st Class Nathaniel Gayle)
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
US Palestine Peace Gaza
Top photo credit : Shutterstock

Congress, you have a chance to implement Trump Gaza plan right

Middle East

Weeks have passed since the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 2803, endorsing a U.S.-backed plan that creates a “Board of Peace” to run Gaza for at least two years and authorizes a new International Stabilization Force (ISF) to secure the territory after a ceasefire.

Supporters call it a diplomatic breakthrough. For many Palestinians, it looks like something else: Oslo with helmets, heavy on security, light on rights, and controlled from outside.

keep readingShow less
I was canceled by three newspapers for criticizing Israel
Top image credit: dennizn and miss.cabul via shutterstock.com

I was canceled by three newspapers for criticizing Israel

Media

As a freelance writer, I know I have to produce copy that meets the expectations of editors and management. When I write opinion pieces, I know well that my arguments should closely align with the publication’s general outlook. But I’ve always believed that if my views on any particular topic diverged from an outlet I’m writing for, it was acceptable to express those viewpoints in other publications.

But I’ve recently discovered that this general rule does not apply to criticism of Israel.

keep readingShow less
Trump corollory
Top image credit: President Donald Trump holds a cabinet meeting, Tuesday, December 2, 2025, in the Cabinet Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's 'Monroe Doctrine 2.0' completely misreads Latin America

Latin America

The “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine, “a common-sense and potent restoration of American power and priorities, consistent with American security interests,” stating that “the American people—not foreign nations nor globalist institutions—will always control their own destiny in our hemisphere,” is a key component of the National Security Strategy 2025 released last week by the Trump administration.

Putting the Western Hemisphere front and center as a U.S. foreign policy priority marks a significant shift from the “pivot to Asia” launched in President Obama’s first term.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.