Follow us on social

2016-03-22t120000z_956638725_gf10000356197_rtrmadp_3_usa-cuba-scaled-e1675801859590

It's time to take Cuba off the terror list

To improve relations, Biden should order a fair review, which will likely conclude that the island nation isn't sponsoring terrorism.

Analysis | Latin America

“What has happened with Cuba is an injustice,” declared Colombia’s newly elected president Gustavo Petro when asked about Cuba’s designation as a sponsor of international terrorism during a press conference with Secretary of State Antony Blinken last October. “It does need to be corrected,” he added. Blinken indicated that the designation would be reviewed: “We have clear laws, clear criteria, clear requirements, and we will continue as necessary to revisit those to see if Cuba continues to merit that designation.”

The Biden administration has been promising for two years to reconsider the designation made by President Trump just a few days before leaving office — a parting shot designed to reward his Cuban American supporters and complicate President Biden’s relations with Havana. That review has yet to happen.

The main rationale Trump’s Secretary of State Mike Pompeo offered for putting Cuba back on the list was Cuba’s refusal to hand over to the Colombian government guerrilla leaders of the National Liberation Army. The rebels were in Havana for peace talks with the Colombian government, co-sponsored by Cuba and Norway. In 2020, conservative President Ivan Duque broke off the talks and called for Trump to declare Cuba a sponsor of terrorism for harboring the negotiators. President Petro has now restarted the talks, asking Cuba and Norway to once again to act as guarantors, negating Pompeo’s rationale.

Cuba was first added to the list of state sponsors of international terrorism in 1982 by President Ronald Reagan to punish Havana for arming revolutionary movements in Central America. Ironically, under the Reagan Doctrine, Washington was supporting counter-revolutionary movements in Nicaragua, Angola, and Afghanistan — movements guilty of far worse terrorist attacks against civilians than any that Cuba supported. But such was the hypocrisy of Cold War foreign policy.

After the Soviet Union collapsed, Cuba stopped providing material support for foreign revolutionaries. Officials in the Clinton administration recognized there was no longer any reason for Cuba to remain on the terrorism list, but were unwilling to risk a political fight with Cuban Americans in south Florida by taking it off.

When President Obama finally ordered a review of Cuba’s designation as part of his policy of normalizing relations, the State Department and intelligence community concluded that Cuba should be removed. As Secretary of State John Kerry pointed out, Washington’s other complaints against Cuba — harboring U.S. fugitives and supporting the Venezuelan government — “fall outside the criteria for designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism.” Obama took Cuba off the list in May 2015. Cuba and the United States then signed a Memorandum of Understanding on law enforcement cooperation, including counter-terrorism cooperation. The Trump administration ignored the MOU and put Cuba back on the terrorism list.

At first glance, the harm to Cuba of being on the list appears limited. Almost all the economic sanctions against listed countries have been in force against Cuba since 1962 under the comprehensive embargo imposed by President Kennedy. But the impact on risk managers at global financial institutions is devastating. When doing business with customers suspected of terrorism, financial institutions are required by law to undertake “enhanced due diligence” to assure that they are not unwittingly financing terrorist activity. The increased costs and risk of doing business with a listed country like Cuba outweigh the profit potential. Within weeks of Cuba being put back on the terrorism list, 45 international banks and financial institutions stopped doing business with the island. “It is a devastating impact,” said Vice-Minister of Foreign Relations Carlos Fernández de Cossio. “And Cuba still, today, by virtue of its presence on that list, runs into commercial and financial organizations that refuse to interact with us for fear of reprisals from the United States Government.”

Besides the financial harm, the designation of Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism adds insult to injury. Since 1959, Cuba has been the victim of hundreds of paramilitary attacks by exiles, many trained and sponsored by the United States during the CIA’s “Secret War” in the 1960s and 1970s. Even after Washington stopped supporting these attacks, it continued to harbor the perpetrators, among the most notorious, Luis Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch, who organized the 1976 bombing of a Cubana civilian airliner killing all 73 people aboard.

When the United States and Cuba were discussing the re-establishment of diplomatic relations in 2015, the issue of the terrorism list was a major sticking point. “It would be difficult to explain that diplomatic relations have been resumed while Cuba is still unjustly listed as a state sponsor of international terrorism," said Josefina Vidal, Cuba’s lead diplomat at the talks. The list is a major obstacle to better relations today as well.

Now that President Biden has apparently decided to improve relations with Havana, taking Cuba off the terrorism list is a logical next step. Recently, a U.S. delegation went to Havana to discuss law enforcement cooperation, including on counter-terrorism — a stark illustration of how anachronistic it is for Cuba to still be on the terrorism list.

President Biden should make good on the promise Secretary Blinken made to President Petro last year: Order a review of Cuba’s listing as a state sponsor of terrorism, honestly applying the “clear criteria, clear requirements” specified in the law. A fair review will conclude, as it did in 2015, that Cuba is not sponsoring terrorism, and taking Cuba off the list will open opportunities for better relations on a wide range of issues benefiting both countries.


A man watches on television as U.S. President Barack Obama delivers a speech at the Gran Teatro de la Habana Alicia Alonso in Havana, March 22, 2016. REUTERS/Ivan Alvarado
Analysis | Latin America
Trump's most underrated diplomatic win: Belarus
Top image credit: Brian Jason and Siarhei Liudkevich via shutterstock.com

Trump's most underrated diplomatic win: Belarus

Europe

Rarely are foreign policy scholars and analysts blessed with as crystalline a case study in abject failure as the Western approach to Belarus since 2020. From promoting concrete security interests, advancing human rights to everything in between, there is no metric by which anything done toward Minsk can be said to have worked.

But even more striking has been the sheer sense of aggrieved befuddlement with the Trump administration for acknowledging this reality and seeking instead to repair ties with Belarus.

keep readingShow less
These Israeli-backed gangs could wreck the Gaza ceasefire
Ashraf al-Mansi walks in front of members of his Popular Army militia. The group, previously known as the Counter-Terrorism Service, has worked with the Israeli military and is considered by many in Gaza to be a criminal gang. (Via the Facebook page of Yasser Abu Shabab)

These Israeli-backed gangs could wreck the Gaza ceasefire

Middle East

Frightening images have emerged from Gaza in the week since a fragile ceasefire took hold between Israel and Hamas. In one widely circulated video, seven blindfolded men kneel in line with militants arrayed behind them. Gunshots ring out in unison, and the row of men collapse in a heap as dozens of spectators look on.

The gruesome scenes appear to be part of a Hamas effort to reestablish control over Gaza through a crackdown on gangs and criminal groups that it says have proliferated during the past two years of war and chaos. In the minds of Israel and its backers, the killings reveal Hamas’ true colors — and represent a preview of what the group may do if it’s allowed to maintain some degree of power.

keep readingShow less
Poland farmers protest EU
Top photo credit: Several thousand people rally against a proposed EU migration scheme in Warsaw, Poland on 11 October, 2025. In a rally organized by the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party thousands gathered to oppose the EU migration pact and an agriculture deal with Mercosur countries. (Photo by Jaap Arriens / Sipa USA)

Poland’s Janus face on Ukraine is untenable

Europe

Of all the countries in Europe, Poland grapples with deep inconsistencies in its approach to both Russia and to Ukraine. As a result, the pro-Europe coalition government of Prime Minister Donald Tusk is coming under increasing pressure as the duplicity becomes more evident.

In its humanitarian response to Ukraine since the war began in 2022, Poland has undoubtedly been one of the most generous among European countries. Its citizens and NGOs threw open their doors to provide food and shelter to Ukrainian women and children fleeing for safety. By 2023, over 1.6 million Ukrainian refugees had applied for asylum or temporary protection in Poland, with around 1 million still present in Poland today.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.