Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1704810679-scaled

Want to help Iran’s reformers? — revive the nuclear deal

As JCPOA re-entry talks are again stalled, the Iranian people are protesting harsh conditions and the regime is cracking down.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

The latest round of indirect negotiations between Iran and the United States for reviving the 2015 nuclear agreement, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which took place in Qatar, ended without any progress. The reason for the quick failure is not clear, as the United States and Iran have offered two distinct reasons for it.

When asked by National Public Radio’s Steve Inskeep why the negotiations failed, Robert Malley, the United States’ chief negotiator with Iran, gave a non-answer response, saying, “The European Union, as coordinator [of the indirect negotiations], put on the table very detailed outlines of what they think a fair outcome would be, and we've said we're prepared to take that deal. The party that has not said yes is Iran.” Just claiming that the negotiations failed because Iran has not said “yes” to the EU proposal, without saying why Iran did so, is not enough. Surely, Malley knows why, but for whatever reason, he refused to specify it.

Axios quoted an unnamed senior American official as saying, “The Iranians have not demonstrated any sense of urgency, raised old issues that have been settled for months, and even raised new issues that are unrelated to the 2015 nuclear agreement.” Once again, this official refused to say what the “old issues” are.

Before leaving office in August 2021, former Iranian President Hassan Rouhani emphasized many times that his administration had reached, in principle, an agreement with the Biden administration on the basic principles for both sides returning to the JCPOA that presumably included removal of the IRGC from the U.S. foreign terrorist organization list. This week, Rouhani repeated again his assertion that the basic elements of the agreement had been agreed upon in March 2021.

It has been reported for months that one stumbling block to concluding an agreement is supposedly Iran’s insistence on the United States removing the IRGC from the list of foreign terrorist organizations, which the United States has refused. But, as I reported previously, a few months ago Iran’s pragmatic Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian had signaled that the IRGC issue was not Iran’s top priority. Indeed, right before the negotiations in Qatar, Reuters quoted Iranian and European diplomats saying that Iran had dropped its demand for the removal of the IRGC's FTO sanctions.

It was also reported that Iran had demanded that the Biden administration guarantee that the next administration will not renege on its JCPOA obligations and re-impose sanctions. But Amir-Abdollahian denied that Iran had made new demands. He said that what Iran wants is a guarantee that as long as the Biden administration is in office, it will benefit economically from returning to the JCPOA. The concern in Tehran is that if Iran returns to the JCPOA, the Biden administration may first remove the sanctions, but later on find a non-nuclear excuse, such as violation of human rights to re-impose them. In that case, Iran will be forced to abide by its JCPOA obligations without receiving any economic benefits, but Washington has refused to guarantee this.

Meanwhile, protests against the terrible state of economy have been on the rise in Iran. Recognizing that the most important reason for the poor state of economy is the U.S. sanctions, the public, as well as the opposition to the hardliners, have been demanding a return to the JCPOA, even if it means making significant concessions. A new poll also indicated that close to 60 percent of the people strongly support returning to the JCPOA, while only 17 percent oppose.

Iran’s hardliners’ reaction to the mounting pressure, demands for a better economy, and returning to the JCPOA has been arresting some leading dissident and political activists. Prominent film makers Mohammad Rasoulof, Jafar Panahi, and Mostafa Al-Ahmad were arrested a week ago, as was the leading reformist and former deputy Interior Minister Mostafa Tajzadeh, for protesting the hardliners and their policies.

Tajzadeh, in particular, has been a strong critic of the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his policies, consistently blaming him for the current state of affairs, his policy throughout the Middle East, and his hardline toward the JCPOA, for which he was jailed for seven years, most of which was in solitary confinement.

In May 2021 Tajzadeh announced his candidacy for Iran’s president with a platform that called for deep and irreversible changes in Iran’s power structure, as well as in the domestic and foreign policies, particularly regarding the Middle East. Though the Guardian Council that vets the candidates rejected him, Tajzadeh has been highly popular among Iranians for his courageous stand against the hardliners and, in particular, Khamenei. Before his recent arrest, whenever he spoke the popular social media forum Clubhouse, tens of thousands of people, both inside and outside Iran, listened to what has to say and asked questions regarding his political and economic positions, to which he always responded bluntly and honestly.

But, since taking office, what President Biden has done has only aided Iran’s hardliners. During his campaign for president in 2020 he promised that he would return to the JCPOA quickly, but while he has been paying lip service to the cause, his administration has continued Trump’s policy by imposing new sanctions on Iran.

Biden’s strong support of Israel while it continues to carry out terrorist attacks in Iran, his threat during his recent trip to Israel that he would be willing to use force against Iran, his signing with Israel’s Prime Minister Yair Lapid of a declaration of strategic partnership that is strongly anti-Iran, and his trip to Saudi Arabia in which he met with Iran’s archenemy Mohammed bin Salman and criticized Iran multiple times, all point to abandoning the promise of a more realistic Iran policy and succumbing to the domestic and foreign pressure. All of these have bolstered what Iran’s hardliners have been saying for years, namely, that one cannot trust the United States.

If Iran is to change, moderate its Middle East policy, and take concrete steps toward a representative government, it has to be done by the Iranian people living in Iran without outside interference. The outside world should not do anything that would hurt Iran’s democratic opposition. To continue Trump’s policy of imposing sanctions, siding with Iran’s regional enemies, and refusing to return to the JCPOA, the Biden administration is greatly hurting not only ordinary Iranian people who have no say on what the hardliners do, but also moderate and progressive Iranians who courageously oppose the hardliners and continue their struggle for a better Iran that would be good for the cause of peace in the Middle East and throughout the world.  


(Shutterstock/ Dmitriy Prayzel)
google cta
Analysis | Middle East
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Starmer Macron Merz
Top image credit: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrive at Kyiv railway station on May 10, 2025, ahead of a gathering of European leaders in the Ukrainian capital. LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS
Europe's snapback gamble risks killing diplomacy with Iran

Craven Europeans give US and Israel a blank check for illegal war

Middle East

In the aftermath of the new U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, the transatlantic alliance has offered a response that confirmed what many both in the West and outside knew all along: that for London, Paris, Berlin, and Brussels, the "rules-based international order" has been reduced to a simple, brutal premise: might makes right, provided the might is Western.

The joint statement from the E3 — France, Germany, and the United Kingdom — is a master class in evasion. "We did not participate in these strikes, but are in close contact with our international partners, including the United States and Israel," they declared. The text also lists all the references and rationalizations used by Iran hawks — “nuclear program, ballistic missile program, regional destabilization and repression against its own people.”

keep readingShow less
Trump Iran
Top image credit: Hundreds of people attend a pro-democracy demonstration against U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., U.S., on February 28, 2026. Demonstrators cited a number of reasons for their opposition to Trump, including his involvement with sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, ICE raids, authoritarian policies, and today’s bombing of Iran. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto) via REUTERS CONNECT

How does this war with Iran end? Or does it?

QiOSK

Now that President Trump has launched an illegal, unprovoked war of choice on Iran, the next question inevitably becomes: how does this end? Or, what are some off ramps Trump can take to end it before the situation turns out of control?

There are three broad scenarios; the first and most likely is that Trump continues this until he gets some sort of regime implosion and then declares victory, while also washing his hands of whatever follows.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.