Follow us on social

google cta
Mq-1c-gray-eagle_1-scaled

Report: White House wants to sell our killer drones to Ukraine

Biden tells us we are not enabling Ukraine to strike outside its borders, but we seem to be giving it every opportunity to do so.

Analysis | Europe
google cta
google cta

It was literally only yesterday that President Biden assured the country in a New York Times op-ed that we would not provide weapons to Ukraine that could penetrate deep inside Russia, risking an escalation to a wider war with Moscow. Now reports are emerging that the White House may be readying to sell Kyiv some of our best killer drones which have the capability of doing just that.

According to an exclusive Reuters report this afternoon, three people close to the situation say the White House has plans to sell Ukraine four MQ-1C Gray Eagle drones that can be armed with Hellfire missiles. The unmanned vehicles are made by General Atomics and are currently used by the U.S. Army, seeing service in Iraq and Afghanistan. We also know it’s been used in the AFRICOM area of operation as recently as 2021, because of an emergency landing that had gone public in northern Niger. At the time, Aviationist writer David Cenciotti described the Gray Eagle this way:

It can fly Reconnaissance, Surveillance, and Target Acquisition (RSTA); convoy protection; Improvised Explosive Device (IED) detection as well as providing live aerial imagery to ground patrols carrying also PGMs (Precision Guided Munitions): in other words, it can support a wide variety of missions including attack, assault, reconnaissance, infiltration and exfiltration, and any kind of known or unknown special operations you may imagine.

It can also fly for 30 hours or more without resting and can carry heavier payloads than the Turkish drones that the Ukrainians are using today. In fact, the Reuters piece calls it “a leap in technology” that “is significant because it puts an advanced reusable U.S. system capable of multiple deep strikes on the battlefield against Russia for the first time.”

In his op-ed in the New York Times Tuesday, Biden assured, “We are not encouraging or enabling Ukraine to strike beyond its borders. We do not want to prolong the war just to inflict pain on Russia.”

Yet the Pentagon announced a new $700 million package just yesterday that includes advanced rocket systems with a range of up to 50 miles, which has the potential of hitting targets within Russia. U.S. officials insisted, however, that they received “assurances” from Ukrainian leaders that they would not be used against Russian territory. The delivery systems, by the way, can be outfitted with longer range missiles down the road.

According to Reuters, the sale of the killer drones would have to go before Congress so it could be scuttled. The White House said at this point there “was nothing to announce,” but the sources for the story said plans were already in motion to train Ukrainians on the sophisticated unmanned system.

Ukrainian president Zelensky has increasingly asked for more sophisticated offensive weapons. Biden tells us that we are only giving Ukraine enough “so it can fight on the battlefield and be in the strongest possible position at the negotiating table.” But this drip-drip of weapons deliveries feels like a slow-moving escalation, and one that may end up going way beyond fueling Ukraine’s capability to fight its own battles on home turf. (Remember the story about the anti-ship missiles? Turns out that conveniently, Denmark is supplying the American-made Harpoons to Ukraine.) What we can look forward to tomorrow is anyone’s guess.


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

The MQ-1C Gray Eagle Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) (US Army photo)
google cta
Analysis | Europe
Von Der Leyen Zelensky
Top image credit: paparazzza / Shutterstock.com
The collapse of Europe's Ukraine policy has sparked a blame game

They are calling fast-track Ukraine EU bid 'nonsense.' So why dangle it?

Europe

Trying to accelerate Ukraine’s entry into the European Union makes sense as part of the U.S.-sponsored efforts to end the war with Russia. But there are two big obstacles to this happening by 2027: Ukraine isn’t ready, and Europe can’t afford it.

As part of ongoing talks to end the war in Ukraine, the Trump administration had advanced the idea that Ukraine be admitted into the European Union by 2027. On the surface, this appears a practical compromise, given Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s concession that Ukraine will drop its aspiration to join NATO.

keep readingShow less
World War II Normandy
Top photo credit: American soldiers march a group of German prisoners along a beachhead in Northern France after which they will be sent to England. June 6, 1944. (U.S. Army Signal Corps Photographic Files/public domain)

Marines know we don't kill unarmed survivors for a reason

Military Industrial Complex

As the Trump Administration continues to kill so-called Venezuelan "narco terrorists" through "non-international armed conflict" (whatever that means), it is clear it is doing so without Congressional authorization and in defiance of international law.

Perhaps worse, through these actions, the administration is demonstrating wanton disregard for centuries of Western battlefield precedent, customs, and traditions that righteously seek to preserve as many lives during war as possible.

keep readingShow less
Amanda Sloat
Top photo credit: Amanda Sloat, with Department of State, in 2015. (VOA photo/Wikimedia Commons)

Pranked Biden official exposes lie that Ukraine war was inevitable

Europe

When it comes to the Ukraine war, there have long been two realities. One is propagated by former Biden administration officials in speeches and media interviews, in which Russian President Vladimir Putin’s illegal invasion had nothing to do with NATO’s U.S.-led expansion into the now shattered country, there was nothing that could have been done to prevent what was an inevitable imperialist land-grab, and that negotiations once the war started to try to end the killing were not only impossible, but morally wrong.

Then there is the other, polar opposite reality that occasionally slips through when officials think few people are listening, and which was recently summed up by former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Europe at the National Security Council Amanda Sloat, in an interview with Russian pranksters whom she believed were aides to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.