Follow us on social

2022-04-07t072220z_76679486_rc27it9ymymj_rtrmadp_3_yemen-security-scaled

What the leadership shake-up in Yemen means for the ongoing war

With a War Powers Resolution looming in Congress to end the US role, the Saudi-led coalition may be seeing the writing on the wall.

Analysis | Middle East

Yemen's President-in-exile Abd Rabo Mansur Hadi announced on Thursday that he has transferred his authority to an eight member group called the Presidential Leadership Council. The move represents one of the most significant political developments in Yemen's civil war in years. 

Hadi’s announcement reflects the outcome of talks convened by the Saudis in Riyadh between various anti-Houthi militias, political leaders, and parties in Yemen. The Houthis had been invited to the talks, but declined to attend on the basis of Saudi Arabia’s role as a belligerent in Yemen’s civil war. With the formation of the Presidential Leadership Council — effectively an anti-Houthi coalition — it becomes clear why the Saudis preferred the Houthis not attend.

The formation of the Council reflects Saudi and possibly American frustration with President Hadi, whose lack of popularity, corruption, and determination to hang on to power had stymied efforts to establish a new political framework for Yemen. By insisting on maintaining power, Hadi had effectively empowered the Houthi rebels and others who opposed his rule. By stepping aside, Hadi has enabled a breakthrough that could lead to progress in resolving Yemen’s intractable conflict.

Why now, after years of intransigence? The timing likely partly reflects recent announcements from Congress that members would reintroduce a War Powers Resolution ending U.S. support for Saudi-led military actions in Yemen. Rather than face the humiliating prospect of losing their ability to operate their own air force without the assistance of U.S. military contractors, the Saudis prefer to pressure their proxies in Yemen to move towards resolving the conflict.

However, both the recent Ramadan ceasefire agreement and the formation of the Presidential Leadership Council may give the false impression that Yemen’s civil war is nearing resolution. Instead, these recent developments could incentivize an escalation in violence from both the anti-Houthi coalition and the Houthis themselves.

The Presidential Leadership Council includes all the major parties opposed to the Houthi rebels. Some are backed by the UAE, including the head of the Southern Transitional Council, a southern secessionist group; the Commander of the Giants Brigades that in January successfully pushed the Houthis out of territory in the provinces of Shabwa and al-Bayda; and the nephew of former president Ali Abdullah Saleh.

However, the inclusion of members of Yemen's main Islamist party, Islah, which the UAE views with suspicion, demonstrates that the UAE did not monopolize the make-up of the Council. One Islah member is the governor of Marib, the oil-rich province the Houthis have tried to take for years; another was a close ally of President Hadi. The Council also includes the governor of Hadramawt, a large and oil-rich province that has largely been spared by the civil war’s violence, as well as a sheikh from Saada, the Houthis’ home province, and a member of the General People’s Congress, the former ruling party.

The head of the council, Rashad al-Alimi, is also a member of the GPC and a former Minister of the Interior; he hails from Taiz, which the Houthis have blockaded since 2015.

These individuals only agree on one thing: their opposition to the Houthis. Houthi representatives condemned the creation of the Council. On Twitter, spokesman Mohammed Abdu Salam called it “a desperate attempt to rearrange the ranks of the mercenaries.” It is not yet clear if the Houthis will respond by breaking the two-month ceasefire and returning to the battlefield as soon as possible, or will conclude that they should come to the negotiating table now, before this newly formed coalition threatens their current hold on territory.

Likewise, with their newfound unity, the members of the Council may prefer to re-engage militarily to try to weaken the Houthis’ territorial control and reduce their influence at any future negotiations. Therefore, while the formation of the Council at least reflects some degree of political movement since the Saudis first intervened to back President Hadi seven years ago, it may portend an increase in violence, when the Yemeni population is already so devastated by war and hunger.

The U.S. role is crucial. The Biden administration should make clear to the Saudis, who oversaw the creation of the Council, that they must continue to adhere to the terms of the Ramadan ceasefire, including by allowing flights into Sanaa airport, which have not yet resumed, and fuel ships to reach Hodeidah. This could help to convince the Houthis that negotiating offers a more productive path forward than violence.

The United States also needs to make clear to the Saudis and the newly formed Council that Congress intends to pass a Yemen War Powers Resolution, which would end all U.S. military support for the Saudis. This, more than any other factor, may help incentivize the Saudis and the Council to uphold the ceasefire and push for negotiations rather than a resumption of fighting.


Yemen's President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi delivers a speech as he delegates his own powers to a presidential council, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia April 7, 2022 in this screen grab taken from a handout video. Yemen TV/via REUTERS TV THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. YEMEN OUT. NO COMMERCIAL OR EDITORIAL SALES IN YEMEN.
Analysis | Middle East
Iran
Top image credit: An Iranian man (not pictured) carries a portrait of the former commander of the IRGC Aerospace Forces, Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, and participates in a funeral for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commanders, Iranian nuclear scientists, and civilians who are killed in Israeli attacks, in Tehran, Iran, on June 28, 2025, during the Iran-Israel ceasefire. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto VIA REUTERS)

First it was regime change, now they want to break Iran apart

Middle East

Washington’s foreign policy establishment has a dangerous tendency to dismantle nations it deems adversarial. Now, neoconservative think tanks like the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) and their fellow travelers in the European Parliament are openly promoting the balkanization of Iran — a reckless strategy that would further destabilize the Middle East, trigger catastrophic humanitarian crises, and provoke fierce resistance from both Iranians and U.S. partners.

As Israel and Iran exchanged blows in mid-June, FDD’s Brenda Shaffer argued that Iran’s multi-ethnic makeup was a vulnerability to be exploited. Shaffer has been a vocal advocate for Azerbaijan in mainstream U.S. media, even as she has consistently failed to disclose her ties to Azerbaijan’s state oil company, SOCAR. For years, she has pushed for Iran’s fragmentation along ethnic lines, akin to the former Yugoslavia’s collapse. She has focused much of that effort on promoting the secession of Iranian Azerbaijan, where Azeris form Iran’s largest non-Persian group.

keep readingShow less
Ratcliffe Gabbard
Top image credit: Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and CIA director John Ratcliffe join a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump and his intelligence team in the Situation Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025. The White House/Handout via REUTERS

Trump's use and misuse of Iran intel

Middle East

President Donald Trump has twice, within the space of a week, been at odds with U.S. intelligence agencies on issues involving Iran’s nuclear program. In each instance, Trump was pushing his preferred narrative, but the substantive differences in the two cases were in opposite directions.

Before the United States joined Israel’s attack on Iran, Trump dismissed earlier testimony by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, in which she presented the intelligence community’s judgment that “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.” Questioned about this testimony, Trump said, “she’s wrong.”

keep readingShow less
Mohammad Bin Salman Trump Ayatollah Khomenei
Top photo credit: Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman (President of the Russian Federation/Wikimedia Commons); U.S. President Donald Trump (Gage Skidmore/Flickr) and Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei (Wikimedia Commons)

Let's make a deal: Enrichment path that both Iran, US can agree on

Middle East

The recent conflict, a direct confrontation that pitted Iran against Israel and drew in U.S. B-2 bombers, has likely rendered the previous diplomatic playbook for Tehran's nuclear program obsolete.

The zero-sum debates concerning uranium enrichment that once defined that framework now represent an increasingly unworkable approach.

Although a regional nuclear consortium had been previously advanced as a theoretical alternative, the collapse of talks as a result of military action against Iran now positions it as the most compelling path forward for all parties.

Before the war, Iran was already suggesting a joint uranium enrichment facility with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on Iranian soil. For Iran, this framework could achieve its primary goal: the preservation of a domestic nuclear program and, crucially, its demand to maintain some enrichment on its own territory. The added benefit is that it embeds Iran within a regional security architecture that provides a buffer against unilateral attack.

For Gulf actors, it offers unprecedented transparency and a degree of control over their rival-turned-friend’s nuclear activities, a far better outcome than a possible covert Iranian breakout. For a Trump administration focused on deals, it offers a tangible, multilateral framework that can be sold as a blueprint for regional stability.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.