Follow us on social

google cta
2022-03-15t135321z_412966886_mt1sipa000ym7s57_rtrmadp_3_sipa-usa-scaled

US general: Weapons sales are a 'low hanging fruit, everyone's interested'

CENTCOM Commander McKenzie unofficially announced the sale of F-15s to Egypt, despite congressional criticism.

Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
google cta
google cta

According to CENTCOM Commander Gen. Kenneth Frank McKenzie, the United States intends to sell the Egyptian government F-15 fighter jets, and that it should be welcome news to everyone. “I think we have good news in that we're going to provide them with F-15s,” Gen. McKenzie said during a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee this week, adding that the dealmaking “was a long, hard slog.” 

This statement is the latest proposal for new U.S. military sales to Egypt, despite significant concerns from Congress and outside critics about human rights abuses, particularly those linked to aerial bombardment

Along with the unofficial announcement of the F-15 sales to Egypt, Gen. McKenzie confirmed that the United States is also exploring options to sell Saudi Arabia more “advanced aircraft and advanced air defense systems.” This, despite the Biden administration’s pledge to end sales of equipment enabling Saudi military offensives in Yemen.

For the UAE, Gen. McKenzie said that the Emiratis “expressed an interest in the F-35 fifth generation fighter and we are in process with them right now to see how that's going to work out.” This $23 billion sale, first offered by the Trump administration after the UAE normalized relations with Israel, was put on hold due to U.S. concerns about Emirati efforts to partner with China on security, which could give the Chinese access to America’s most advanced military technologies.

Gen. McKenzie assured the Senate committee that “with our weapons, come our values.” Yet just days prior to the hearing, the Saudi government carried out a mass execution, beheading 81 people, 41 of whom were Shiite, a persecuted minority in Saudi Arabia and killed for engaging in anti-government protests. Meanwhile, the Saudi-led war on Yemen carries on, which has killed almost half a million civilians. And Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi’s, government routinely detains and tortures dissidents, including U.S. citizens.

McKenzie and the Biden administration evidently consider the sale of weapons and the disbursement of military aid to supersede such evidently minor concerns. In September of 2021, the administration was set to withhold $300 million worth of military aid to Egypt, largely determined by the Secretary of State’s approval that the Egyptian government is taking steps to address human rights concerns. Instead, the administration halted $130 million, while releasing the other $170 million to Egypt despite its government’s persistent human rights violations. 

The State Department then went forward with approving $2.5 billion in foreign military sales to Egypt. More than $2 billion would go towards the C-130J-3- Super Hercules Aircraft, while $355 million would go towards Air Defense Radar Systems. The State Department announced the possible sale on January 25, the anniversary of the 2011 Egyptian Revolution that overthrew President Mubarak and sought to rid Egypt of dictatorship.

Likewise, despite Biden’s alleged commitment to ending support for Saudi military offensives in the war in Yemen, in December, the State Department notified Congress of over $650 million in new arms sales to Saudi Arabia. The sale was justified on the basis of supporting the Kingdom in defense against attacks from Yemen’s Houthis. 

The weapons sales have not come without pressure from members of Congress. In January, Reps. Don Beyer (D-Va.) and Tom Malinowski (D-N.J.), co-chairs of Congress’s Egypt Human Rights Caucus, released a statement calling on the Biden administration to do more to pressure Egypt. “Rewarding such a cynical move would make it even less likely that Egypt will take our requests on human rights or any other issue seriously in the future,” they said in a statement in regards to the Egyptian government benefiting from military sales amidst “broader campaign of repression, arbitrary detention, and extrajudicial punishments”. 

On the Republican side, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has emerged as a consistent critic of the disconnect between the administration’s stated commitment to human rights and its decisions on military sales. The Senator has made multiple attempts to compel the administration, most recently proposing a bipartisan joint resolution of disapproval for the arm sales to Egypt. “The United States cannot proudly affirm human rights to be at the center of our foreign policy, while it arms a regime at war with its own people,” he wrote for Responsible Statecraft, referring to the administration going forward with the $2.5 billion arm sales to Egypt. 

Sen. Paul's efforts have extended to cut off military sales to Saudi Arabia and the UAE as well. In December 2020, he introduced a joint resolution of disapproval of arm sales to the UAE, while in November 2021 introduced a resolution of disapproval for the U.S. arm sales to Saudi Arabia. Both resolutions gained little overall traction in changing course in Congress. 

Gen. McKenzie’s announcement this week regarding F-15 sales to Egypt highlights that these transactions are clearly not contingent on the buyer adhering to American values, and rather a continuation of unnecessary and inhumane arm sales to leaders who continually commit human rights abuses. In the hearing, Gen. McKenzie described U.S. aerial defense systems as “low hanging fruit — everyone’s interested in it,” highlighting the willingness of the U.S. to profit from military sales even if it means sacrificing U.S. values.


General Kenneth McKenzie, Commander, United States Central Command, appears before a Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing to examine the posture of United States Central Command and United States Africa Command, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, DC, Tuesday, March 15, 2022. Credit: Rod Lamkey / CNP/Sipa USANo Use Germany.
google cta
Analysis | Military Industrial Complex
nuclear weapons testing
A mushroom cloud expands over the Bikini Atoll during a U.S. nuclear weapons test in 1946. (Shutterstock/ Everett Collection)

Nuke treaty loss a 'colossal' failure that could lead to nuclear arms race

Global Crises

On February 13th, 2025, President Trump said something few expected to hear. He said, “There's no reason for us to be building brand-new nuclear weapons. We already have so many. . . You could destroy the world 50 times over, 100 times over. And here we are building new nuclear weapons . . . We’re all spending a lot of money that we could be spending on other things that are actually, hopefully, much more productive.”

I could not agree more with that statement. But with today’s expiration of the New START Treaty, we face the very real possibility of a new nuclear arms race — something that, to my knowledge, neither the President, Vice President, nor any other senior U.S. official has meaningfully discussed.

keep readingShow less
Witkoff Kushner Trump
Top image credit: U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff looks on during a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., December 29, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

As US-Iran talks resume, will Israel play spoiler (again)?

Middle East

This Friday, the latest chapter in the long, fraught history of U.S.-Iran negotiations will take place in Oman. Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi and President Trump’s Special Envoy Steve Witkoff will meet in an effort to stave off a war between the U.S. and Iran.

The negotiations were originally planned as a multilateral forum in Istanbul, with an array of regional Arab and Muslim countries present, apart from the U.S. and Iran — Turkey, Qatar, Oman, and Saudi Arabia.

keep readingShow less
Trump Putin
Top image credit: Miss.Cabal/shutterstock.com

Last treaty curbing US, Russia nuclear weapons has collapsed

Global Crises

The end of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), the last treaty between the U.S. and Russia placing limits on their respective nuclear arsenals, may not make an arms race inevitable. There is still potential for pragmatic diplomacy.

Both sides can adhere to the basic limits even as they modernize their arsenals. They can bring back some of the risk-reduction measures that stabilized their relationship for years. And they can reengage diplomatically with each other to craft new agreements. The alternative — unconstrained nuclear competition — is dangerous, expensive, and deeply unpopular with most Americans.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.