Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1873415833

Young veteran: Can we end the Korean War now, please?

I served along the DMZ in South Korea 65 years after the start of that conflict, and still have friends stationed there today.

Analysis | Asia-Pacific

As an Army infantry veteran and a member of the Korean War Veterans Association (KWVA) and Korean Defense Veterans Association (KDVA), I applaud the Biden administration’s consideration of an end-of-war declaration for the Korean War. I served along the demilitarized zone in South Korea from 2014-2015 at the United Nations Command Security Battalion-Joint Security Area and have friends who are still stationed there. To those of us who have served in Korea, the prospect of renewed conflict is real. Policymakers should do everything in their power to make sure that we close that chapter of conflict responsibly. 

Ask any service member that has served at the DMZ and they will tell you how tense it is on the ground. Having stood face-to-face with North Korean soldiers myself, every move is watched by both sides. Walking through the T2 building at the Joint Security Area that bisects the border, I was constantly reminded that things could flare up at a moment’s notice. A single movement by a guard or a civilian on tour could be misconstrued as threatening and spiral out of control. Sometimes, unpredictable crises would ensue, as in November 2017 when a worm-infested North Korean defector ran across the border into South Korea. Finally, disaster could be slow-moving. With nearly a million landmines covering the DMZ, a landmine explosion could trigger a more significant conflict if one side perceives it to be the opening stage of an attack.

Given such a high degree of uncertainty, diplomatic efforts to formally end the 1950-1953 Korean War are something that every veteran and military family should support.  An Armistice Agreement stopped the fighting, but a true peace treaty has never been signed.

The KWVA appreciated the talks between former President Trump and Kim Jung Un, even though they did not lead to transformation in bilateral relations as pledged in Singapore. Tim Whitmore, an air medic stationed in South Korea in 1954 and the current National Director of KWVA, stated in 2018 that, “I personally pray for a strong and lasting peace with a reunited Korea.” And Tom Stevens, the previous president of KWVA, stated in 2018 that, “The Korean War Veterans Association, Inc. is hopeful that the recent talks between President Trump and Kim Jung Un are only the first step which ultimately results in peace on the Korean Peninsula.”

The KDVA also held peace talks in July of this year alongside the Korea-U.S. Alliance Foundation, in which one of the speakers, Markus Garlauskus, himself a KDVA member and a nonresident senior fellow at Atlantic Council, stated, “the question of denuclearization of the Korean peninsula, and the total end to North Korea’s nuclear capabilities, is not a question that can be resolved through force of arms at an acceptable cost.”

Indeed, ending hostilities necessitates a political solution that addresses the underlying causes of instability. The cost of another Korean War on the Peninsula would be catastrophic. A conventional war would put the 28,500 U.S. service members stationed in South Korea in harm’s way. According to the Congressional Research Service report from 2017, “an escalation of a military conflict on the peninsula could affect upwards of 25 million people on either side of the border, including at least 100,000 U.S. citizens, even if the DPRK uses only its conventional munitions.” Those conventional munitions are capable of firing 10,000 rounds per minute at Seoul according to the same report. That level of devastation should be wholly unacceptable to the Biden Administration. 

Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman General Mark Milley recently stated, "Our intent in North Korea, or China, or Russia, we want to maintain a military capability and a diplomatic level of effort to deter war.” The key is to invest in diplomacy and to give policymakers space to make hard choices when necessary.  

Veterans of the Korean War, especially service members who have served on the Peninsula, want to see a formal end to this original “forever war.” But an end-of-war declaration is only the beginning of a long process of peacebuilding. The United States and North Korea, as well as the North and South, whose civil war continues on to this day, will need to build trust and political support for a peace declaration, peace treaty, and an eventual peace regime to institutionalize peace on the Korean Peninsula. Without it, more men and women will be sent in harm’s way, unsure if we will return home.


US soldier at a Memorial to the Military Armistice Agreement at Panmunjom in the Joint Security Area or JSA on the border with North Korea in 2015. (Eleanor Scriven/Shutterstock)
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
Iran Oman
Top image credit: Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is welcomed by an unidentified Omani official upon his arrival in Muscat, Oman, May 11, 2025. Iranian Foreign Ministry/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS

Iran talks: At least they're still negotiating

Middle East

The fourth round of nuclear talks between Iran and the United States concluded Sunday in Muscat, Oman after a one-week delay. Many observers saw the postponement as a result of the Trump administration’s contradictory approach and lack of a clear endgame.

Just two days before the talks, U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff gave an interview to Breitbart, seeming to suggest “zero enrichment” as the administration’s red line and calling for the dismantlement of Iran’s core nuclear facilities. This maximalist stance stood in contrast with more measured comments by President Trump, who recently said the United States had "not yet decided" whether Iran could retain a civilian nuclear program. Vice President J.D. Vance struck a similarly ambiguous tone at a recent conference in Europe.

keep readingShow less
West Bank
Top image credit: Israeli forces arrest a Palestinian activist during a demonstration near Bethlehem, West Bank, November 14, 2012. Editorial credit: Ryan Rodrick Beiler / Shutterstock.com

'Terrorism'? Israel has weaponized the charge for decades

Middle East

What do human rights activists in Jerusalem, humanitarian aid workers in Gaza, and college students in New York all have in common according to Israel and its influence network? They all purportedly have links to terrorism. Although such accusations are often baseless, they are frequently used to besmirch and undercut those who are unwilling to do Israel’s bidding.

Although this is a tactic very much on display today, it is one I first came across while serving with the U.S. Security Coordinator (USSC) in the West Bank, when a similar pattern of accusations and complaints from Israel, as documented in a report that has not been previously disclosed, threatened to wreck what was, back then in 2008, already a tenuous peace process in the West Bank.

keep readingShow less
Donald Trump
Top image credti: White House

The hidden costs of Trump's 'madman' approach to tariffs

Global Crises

Is the trade war launched by Donald Trump the act of a madman or a mad genius?

To the extent Trump’s tariffs are a “negotiating strategy,” as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has claimed, are critics missing that they are simply part of the “art of the deal” that will enable America to gain coercive leverage over other states? According to the madman theory of international politics, it is possible Trump’s gambit has a strategic logic. However, there is a crucial flaw with this strategy that will likely cause it to fail.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.