Follow us on social

google cta
2048px-shrine_of_john_the_baptist_great_umayyid_mosque_damascus

US-funded media spreads bizarre conspiracy theory about Shi'a Muslims

The charges against the al-Khoe’i Foundation were so wild that the State Department had to step in and disavow the story.

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The U.S. government’s Arabic-language news channel amplified a conspiracy theory about a Shi’a Muslim foundation so bizarre that even the U.S. State Department disavowed it on Saturday.

The U.S.-funded outlet Alhurra ran a brief web story on Friday about how Iran may be “spreading terrorism” in Europe through the al-Khoe’i Foundation, a London-based Shi’a Muslim institution. Alhurra’s only source was a dubious report by the Israeli think tank Alma, and it did not include a response from al-Khoe’i Foundation.

The U.S. State Department rebuffed the article on Saturday.

“Al-Khoe’i Foundation is a well-regarded international charitable and educational organization that has been doing good work since its establishment in 1989,” the department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs clarified in a Twitter statement.

The foundation was created in 1989 by the Iraqi cleric Ayatollah Abul-Qasim al-Khoe’i, then living in exile. It now represents the Shi’a Muslim community at United Nations consultations, and runs mosques around the world, including the largest Shi’a mosque in New York.

Both al-Khoe’i and his successor, Ayatollah Ali Sistani, have opposed the Iranian model of Shi’a theocracy. Al-Khoe’i’s son, Abdul-Majid al-Khoe’i, was assassinated in 2003 by followers of the anti-American populist Muqtada al-Sadr.

The United States has long tried to court Sistani as an ally in Iraq, as he is well-respected and regarded as a political moderate. Sistani even hosted Pope Francis during the Pontiff’s visit to Iraq earlier this year.

Alma’s report provides no evidence that al-Khoe’i Foundation is actually connected to terrorism, and frequently conflates the Iranian regime’s ideology with Shi’a Islam as a religion. For example, the report complains that al-Khoe’i Foundation “promotes the principles of Shia [sic] around the world,” and is “spreading the Shia [sic] in Europe.”

The report’s main piece of evidence connecting al-Khoe’i Foundation to Iran is spurious: the foundation’s Paris mosque is listed in the Ahlul Bayt Digital Islamic Library, a Michigan-based academic institute whose name sounds similar to an Iranian religious institution called the Ahlul Bayt World Assembly.

However, the two are different organizations, and “Ahlul Bayt” is a common Islamic religious term referring to the family of the Prophet Muhammad.

Al-Khoe’i Foundation later clarified to Alhurra that it has no connection to the Ahlul Bayt World Assembly or the Iranian government.

Alma’s report also claims that al-Khoe’i Foundation helps finance the Houthi rebellion in Yemen. Its evidence is an article claiming that “Iranian Shi’a institutions” in Britain are supporting the Houthis under the guise of humanitarian aid. The article only cites anonymous sources, and first appeared on a website founded by a former Egyptian official to defend Arab regimes like Egypt, the Emirates, and Saudi Arabia.

Alhurra’s decision to promote these claims sent the U.S. government scrambling to control the damage.

The State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs issued its statement on Saturday, and Alhurra corrected the story with comments from al-Khoe’i Foundation.

“The writer is either completely unaware of what he writes…or has some motive,” said Sheikh Isma’il al-Khaliq, head preacher at the foundation’s Paris mosque. “Al-Khoe’i Foundation’s approach is to spread Islamic cultural and educational thought, found in the approach of the Prophet and Ahlul Bayt.”

Al-Khaliq added that the foundation’s methods are “cultural and intellectual work, not political work.”

But the damage was already done, as Alhurra’s original story was reprinted on a variety of Arabic-language news websites. And the State Department’s statement prompted the Jerusalem Post to run its own story repeating Alma’s claims.

The U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees Alhurra, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Shrine of John the Baptist, Great Umayyid Mosque, Damascus (James Gordon/Creative Commons)
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.