Follow us on social

2048px-shrine_of_john_the_baptist_great_umayyid_mosque_damascus

US-funded media spreads bizarre conspiracy theory about Shi'a Muslims

The charges against the al-Khoe’i Foundation were so wild that the State Department had to step in and disavow the story.

Analysis | QiOSK

The U.S. government’s Arabic-language news channel amplified a conspiracy theory about a Shi’a Muslim foundation so bizarre that even the U.S. State Department disavowed it on Saturday.

The U.S.-funded outlet Alhurra ran a brief web story on Friday about how Iran may be “spreading terrorism” in Europe through the al-Khoe’i Foundation, a London-based Shi’a Muslim institution. Alhurra’s only source was a dubious report by the Israeli think tank Alma, and it did not include a response from al-Khoe’i Foundation.

The U.S. State Department rebuffed the article on Saturday.

“Al-Khoe’i Foundation is a well-regarded international charitable and educational organization that has been doing good work since its establishment in 1989,” the department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs clarified in a Twitter statement.

The foundation was created in 1989 by the Iraqi cleric Ayatollah Abul-Qasim al-Khoe’i, then living in exile. It now represents the Shi’a Muslim community at United Nations consultations, and runs mosques around the world, including the largest Shi’a mosque in New York.

Both al-Khoe’i and his successor, Ayatollah Ali Sistani, have opposed the Iranian model of Shi’a theocracy. Al-Khoe’i’s son, Abdul-Majid al-Khoe’i, was assassinated in 2003 by followers of the anti-American populist Muqtada al-Sadr.

The United States has long tried to court Sistani as an ally in Iraq, as he is well-respected and regarded as a political moderate. Sistani even hosted Pope Francis during the Pontiff’s visit to Iraq earlier this year.

Alma’s report provides no evidence that al-Khoe’i Foundation is actually connected to terrorism, and frequently conflates the Iranian regime’s ideology with Shi’a Islam as a religion. For example, the report complains that al-Khoe’i Foundation “promotes the principles of Shia [sic] around the world,” and is “spreading the Shia [sic] in Europe.”

The report’s main piece of evidence connecting al-Khoe’i Foundation to Iran is spurious: the foundation’s Paris mosque is listed in the Ahlul Bayt Digital Islamic Library, a Michigan-based academic institute whose name sounds similar to an Iranian religious institution called the Ahlul Bayt World Assembly.

However, the two are different organizations, and “Ahlul Bayt” is a common Islamic religious term referring to the family of the Prophet Muhammad.

Al-Khoe’i Foundation later clarified to Alhurra that it has no connection to the Ahlul Bayt World Assembly or the Iranian government.

Alma’s report also claims that al-Khoe’i Foundation helps finance the Houthi rebellion in Yemen. Its evidence is an article claiming that “Iranian Shi’a institutions” in Britain are supporting the Houthis under the guise of humanitarian aid. The article only cites anonymous sources, and first appeared on a website founded by a former Egyptian official to defend Arab regimes like Egypt, the Emirates, and Saudi Arabia.

Alhurra’s decision to promote these claims sent the U.S. government scrambling to control the damage.

The State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs issued its statement on Saturday, and Alhurra corrected the story with comments from al-Khoe’i Foundation.

“The writer is either completely unaware of what he writes…or has some motive,” said Sheikh Isma’il al-Khaliq, head preacher at the foundation’s Paris mosque. “Al-Khoe’i Foundation’s approach is to spread Islamic cultural and educational thought, found in the approach of the Prophet and Ahlul Bayt.”

Al-Khaliq added that the foundation’s methods are “cultural and intellectual work, not political work.”

But the damage was already done, as Alhurra’s original story was reprinted on a variety of Arabic-language news websites. And the State Department’s statement prompted the Jerusalem Post to run its own story repeating Alma’s claims.

The U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees Alhurra, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Shrine of John the Baptist, Great Umayyid Mosque, Damascus (James Gordon/Creative Commons)
Analysis | QiOSK
Afghanistan withdrawal
Lloyd Austin, Kenneth McKenzie, and Mark Milley in 2021. (MSNBC screengrab)

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on US or region

Military Industrial Complex

It will be four years since the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan on Aug. 30, 2021, ending a nearly 20-year occupation that could serve as a poster child for mission creep.

What began in October 2001 as a narrow intervention to destroy al-Qaeda, the terrorist group that perpetrated the 9/11 attacks, and topple the Taliban government for refusing to hand over al-Qaeda’s leader, Osama bin Laden, morphed into an open-ended nation-building operation that killed 2,334 U.S. military personnel and wounded over 20,000 more.

keep readingShow less
Francois Bayrou Emmanuel Macron
Top image credit: France's Prime Minister Francois Bayrou arrives to hear France's President Emmanuel Macron deliver a speech to army leaders at l'Hotel de Brienne in Paris on July 13, 2025, on the eve of the annual Bastille Day Parade in the French capital. LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS

Europe facing revolts, promising more guns with no money

Europe

If you wanted to create a classic recipe for political crisis, you could well choose a mixture of a stagnant economy, a huge and growing public debt, a perceived need radically to increase military spending, an immigration crisis, a deeply unpopular president, a government without a majority in parliament, and growing radical parties on the right and left.

In other words, France today. And France’s crisis is only one part of the growing crisis of Western Europe as a whole, with serious implications for the future of transatlantic relations.

keep readingShow less
Starmer Macron Merz
Top image credit: France's President Emmanuel Macron, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrive at Kyiv railway station on May 10, 2025, ahead of a gathering of European leaders in the Ukrainian capital. LUDOVIC MARIN/Pool via REUTERS

Europe's snapback gamble risks killing diplomacy with Iran

Middle East

Europe appears set to move from threats to action. According to reports, the E3 — Britain, France, and Germany — will likely trigger the United Nations “snapback” process this week. Created under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA), this mechanism allows any participant to restore pre-2015 U.N. sanctions if Iran is judged to be in violation of its commitments.

The mechanism contains a twist that makes it so potent. Normally, the Security Council operates on the assumption that sanctions need affirmative consensus to pass. But under snapback, the logic is reversed. Once invoked, a 30-day clock begins. Sanctions automatically return unless the Security Council votes to keep them suspended, meaning any permanent member can force their reimposition with a single veto.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.