Follow us on social


Iran may exit the nuclear accord if the US succeeds in extending UN arms embargo

Rouhani knows very well that if his government continues to unilaterally implement the nuclear deal, he will come under more attacks from his political opponents and hardliners.

Analysis | Middle East

As the U.N. arms embargo on Iran nears its October 2020 expiration date, the United States has intensified its campaign to extend the ban — which was implemented as part of the landmark 2015 nuclear deal between Iran, the United States, the U.K., France, Germany, Russia, and China.

Donald Trump’s administration has proposed a draft resolution to the U.N. Security Council that would prevent Iran from supplying, selling, or transferring weapons and related materials unless the Security Council committee monitoring U.N. sanctions approves such transfers. The draft resolution also calls on all U.N. member states to inspect cargo transiting through their territory to check for illegal arms to imports or exports from Iran, and grants them authority to seize and destroy such arms.

Iran has strongly condemned the U.S. move and has said that since Washington has pulled out of the nuclear deal, or Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, it has no right to invoke the agreement’s sanctions snapback mechanism. Tehran’s U.N. ambassador Majid Takht-Ravanchi has written a series of tweets stating that “U.S. cannot be a JCPOA ‘Participant,’ since Donald Trump ceased U.S. participation,” and that “The U.S., which is in violation of the resolution — has no right to initiate anything under 2231,” referring to the U.N. resolution that codified the agreement.

Despite Iran’s strong opposition, the United States continues to work on extending the arms embargo. For their part, Iranian officials have warned that such a move would provoke a backlash from Tehran.

In a letter to the leaders of the remaining JCPOA signatories on May 6, 2020, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani warned against attempts to extend the arms embargo on Tehran, calling the move “a big mistake” and “a historic failure” with potentially dire consequences.

The Iranian president has also said that he had told Russia, China, Britain, France, and Germany how Iran will react if the embargo is extended. But what will be Iran's reaction?

Is the end of the JCPOA near?

The possible approval of the U.S. draft resolution to extend Iran's arms embargo could put an end to Iran’s policy of “strategic patience” and might be the final nail in the coffin of the JCPOA.

At the end of his administration, Rouhani has not been able to enjoy the benefits of its greatest foreign policy achievement, the JCPOA. Now, in the year before he hands over the presidency, his government is struggling with various political, economic, and foreign policy problems, and the situation is getting worse across the board.

In the meantime, he needs to leave behind a legacy: in various speeches, Rouhani has repeatedly referred to the lifting of Iran's soon to be expiring arms sanctions as one of his government's most important achievements. Now that the JCPOA has yielded nothing for him and his government, the lifting of such bans after 13 years could have a lasting effect on his legacy after eight years in office.

A look at history can help us predict Iran's future strategy. In the final years of the reformist President Seyyed Mohammad Khatami's administration, when the U.S. acts of sabotage succeeded in breaking apart the agreements between Iran and the U.K., France, and Germany, Hassan Rouhani, who headed Iran's nuclear negotiating team at the time, announced the end of Iran’s voluntary suspension of uranium enrichment before the end of the Khatami’s government. Nevertheless, U.S. obstacles made the Iran-Europe agreementsthe Saadabad Declaration of 2003, the Brussels Agreement of 2004, and the Paris Agreement of 2004 — ineffective.

Rouhani, now as president, knows very well that if his government continues to unilaterally implement the nuclear deal, he will come under more attacks from his political opponents and hardliners.

When Rouhani was criticized by his opponents in the run-up to the 2013 presidential election over the failure of the 2003 and 2004 nuclear talks, he would respond by saying that Iran unilaterally had withdrawn from the agreements and resumed uranium enrichment.

I asked a senior Iranian diplomat, who spoke to me on condition of anonymity, if Tehran would leave the JCPOA in the case that the U.N. arms embargo is extended.

“We hope this does not happen, but as we have explained in more detail, both publicly and privately, to the remaining signatories to the JCPOA, this will certainly have serious consequences,” he said. “Not only withdrawal from the JCPOA, but also no other political actions will be out of Iran’s agenda.”

In sum, Rouhani should be expected not to grant the privilege of JCPOA exit to the next Iranian government, and will likely pull out Iran from the agreement himself if the extension of the U.N. arms embargo proceeds and renders it a fruitless accord.

lev radin /
Analysis | Middle East
The moderate wins in Iran. So what does it mean for the US?

Iran's President-elect Masoud Pezeshkian gestures during a gathering with his supporters at the shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, in south of Tehran, Iran July 6, 2024. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS

The moderate wins in Iran. So what does it mean for the US?

Middle East

Political moderation has won a victory in Iran.

Cardiac surgeon and former health minister Masoud Pezeshkian defeated stalwart conservative Saeed Jalili in a presidential runoff election, by a margin of 16.3 million votes to 13.5 million votes.

keep readingShow less
Biden: Like the nation, I am indispensable too

ABC News interview with President Biden Friday July 5 (Screenshot/ABC)

Biden: Like the nation, I am indispensable too

Washington Politics

The president insisted that his campaign would continue and that he was the best candidate for the job in an interview with ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos on Friday.

Rejecting calls for him to step aside, Biden defended his determination to remain in the race by using one of his favorite foreign policy talking points, the conceit that America is the indispensable or essential nation. Building on the idea expressed by then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright a quarter century ago, the president said, “You know, not only am I campaigning, but I'm running the world. Not — and that's not hy — sounds like hyperbole, but we are the essential nation of the world. Madeleine Albright was right.”

keep readingShow less
Diplomacy Watch: A peace summit without Russia
Diplomacy Watch: What’s the point of Swiss peace summit?

Diplomacy Watch: Ukraine, West prepare for an uncertain future


As November’s election approaches, the Ukrainian government and NATO member countries are planning for the possibility that European and American leadership may be less enthusiastic about supporting Kyiv’s war effort.

Meanwhile, Trump’s team-in-waiting is preparing for how it might deal with the thorny issues of rethinking the NATO alliance and managing the war in Ukraine.

keep readingShow less

Israel-Gaza Crisis