Follow us on social

google cta
Iranian-Americans in the age of Trump, the Travel Ban, and the Threat of War

Iranian-Americans in the age of Trump, the Travel Ban, and the Threat of War

It's difficult to grapple with the fact that the very same people who claim to fight for democracy and freedom in Iran, are at the same time eroding the foundations of democracy in the United States.

Analysis | Middle East
google cta
google cta

I was born and raised in the United States to Iranian parents and, like many children of immigrants, grew up with a sense of alienation from my fellow Americans. Though raised in the most populace location of the Iranian diaspora in Southern California, my hyphenated identity seemed to be in conflict with itself as Iran was consistently vilified in U.S. media and politics. But rather than attempt to hide my identity, I became determined to move beyond the surface politics to understand more about Iran and, ultimately, to try to bridge the divide between my country of heritage and the country I called home.

To that end, I entered graduate school to study the history and culture of Iran, which also provided me the opportunity to travel there and do field research. An eye-opening experience, I realized that we are more alike than we are different, and any enmity that may exist between the two countries, was a consequence of their governments, not their people.

In recent weeks, the subject of Iran has again dominated much of our news and media attention. From the assassination of Qassem Soleimani, to Iran’s retaliation and 176 lost lives in a downed civilian plane, the world held its breath and braced for a possible war. As Iranian-Americans were detained at borders for inappropriate questioning about political views — in an increasingly xenophobic and hostile environment — we were inundated with images and stories of the Iranian-American community, often asked the same question, "how do you feel about the current situation?"

No one person or organization can represent the views of an entire community. Iranian-Americans are not a monolith, they are a diverse group with different socioeconomic, religious, and political backgrounds. However, some broad inclinations can be derived from field research in the diaspora, as well as polling that shows the majority do not support a war with Iran, President Trump’s Iran policy, or the travel ban. This should come as no shock, because in fact these are the views of the majority of all Americans.

Despite the prevalence of antiwar sentiments among this diaspora, there are some rather loud voices that have attempted to co-opt the community and speak for all, while defaming anyone with an opposing political view as an agent of the Islamic Republic. Anyone from community advocates and elected officials, to academics, human rights workers, and journalists have suffered such vitriol. Though the strategy is not shocking in the Trump era, it is disconcerting in a period of rising threats to our democracy. It has been jarring to have a president threatening to bomb 52 Iranian cultural sites, while others call for the deportation of U.S. citizens with conflicting political attitudes and the repression of American civil advocacy groups. When Iranian-American civil liberties are endangered with discriminatory practices by Customs and Border Patrol and bank account closures, I assumed fellow Iranian-Americans — despite differences in opinion on the best policies towards Iran — would stand in principle for rule of law and against the unexplained and often humiliating deportations of Iranian students.

It is a point of irony, that the very people who claim to fight for democracy and freedom in Iran, would erode the foundations of democracy in the United States. In a democratic political system, both individuals and groups are given a platform to share their views and support them with analysis and sources. The public is then free to make its own assessments, vote, and support or oppose legislation as they see fit. This is an oversimplification of course, but it gets to the crux of the matter at hand. We are allowed to have opposing views and express them without threats of physical harm, imprisonment, deportation, or slander. This is the most basic component of a democracy.

But to understand this confusion and this divide we must examine the differences of these groups. The Iranian-American diaspora is not as divided as it seems, the issue is that we are having two different discussions. There is an important distinction between a member of the diaspora, which is anyone of Iranian heritage, and a member of a dissident group, which by their own admission seek the overthrow of a foreign government and have already hand-picked its successor from outside Iran. Although the diaspora cares deeply for events in Iran because of our families and friends that reside there, our focus and attention is on the politics of our country, the United States. For dissident groups, the lens through which they see events and discuss them is Iran, not the U.S. Thus, as we yell passed each other, a simple truth is lost, we are not having the same conversation.

I grew up listening to debates about Iran and how best to ensure the freedom that Iranians have struggled to achieve for over a century. While some have held onto vestiges of the past, such as the monarchy that was overthrown in Iran’s 1979 revolution, the majority of Iranian-Americans hold firmly that they wish for a democratic and secular Iran, but to be established by Iranians themselves. Additionally, we wish to be treated as equal citizens in the United States, which this current administration has demoralized with the Muslim Ban and sanction laws that harm Americans as well.

It is time to recognize that the “Iranian” hyphen is not an identity in opposition to our American self, but that this diversity actually defines our American identity. As Americans we expect equal treatment under the law, and as Americans we will hold our government accountable to the will of the people. For some Iranian immigrants, especially those exiled or who fled Iran, America may have been a placeholder, a temporary spot to wait out the eventual collapse of the Islamic Republic. However, for most Iranian-Americans, especially those born after the revolution, America is our home. We want democracy and freedom for Iran, not because of Iranian exceptionalism, but because those are the values we aspire for at home, and therefore believe all people deserve.

Though diverse, the Iranian-American diaspora is not as divided as it seems because America is not as divided as it seems. Over and over Americans have called for diplomatic solutions, an end to endless wars, and have worked tirelessly to realize the full breadth of equality and freedoms we have espoused for centuries. Remember that despite the divisive rhetoric of the Trump era, he still lost the popular vote by nearly 3 million. It may be fair to say that disruptive voices are loud and aggressive precisely because they are aware of their own weakness. But the strength of our collective voices does not come from numbers, it comes from the conviction that these words are still revolutionary, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

google cta
Analysis | Middle East
What use is a mine ban treaty if signers at war change their minds?
Top image credit: Voodison328 via shutterstock.com

What use is a mine ban treaty if signers at war change their minds?

Global Crises

Earlier this month in Geneva, delegates to the Antipersonnel Mine Ban Treaty’s 22nd Meeting of States Parties confronted the most severe crisis in the convention’s nearly three-decade history. That crisis was driven by an unprecedented convergence of coordinated withdrawals by five European states and Ukraine’s attempt to “suspend” its treaty obligations amid an ongoing armed conflict.

What unfolded was not only a test of the resilience of one of the world’s most successful humanitarian disarmament treaties, but also a critical moment for the broader system of international norms designed to protect civilians during and after war. Against a background of heightened tensions resulting from the war in Ukraine and unusual divisions among the traditional convention champions, the countries involved made decisions that will have long-term implications.

keep readingShow less
The 8 best foreign policy books of 2025
Top image credit: Dabari CGI/Shutterstock

The 8 best foreign policy books of 2025

Media

I spent the last few weeks asking experts about the foreign policy books that stood out in 2025. My goal was to create a wide-ranging list, featuring volumes that shed light on the most important issues facing American policymakers today, from military spending to the war in Gaza and the competition with China. Here are the eight books that made the cut.

keep readingShow less
Why Russians haven't risen up to stop the Ukraine war
Top image credit: People walking on Red square in Moscow in winter. (Oleg Elkov/Shutterstock)

Why Russians haven't risen up to stop the Ukraine war

Europe

After its emergence from the Soviet collapse, the new Russia grappled with the complex issue of developing a national identity that could embrace the radical contradictions of Russia’s past and foster integration with the West while maintaining Russian distinctiveness.

The Ukraine War has significantly changed public attitudes toward this question, and led to a consolidation of most of the Russian population behind a set of national ideas. This has contributed to the resilience that Russia has shown in the war, and helped to frustrate Western hopes that economic pressure and heavy casualties would undermine support for the war and for President Vladimir Putin. To judge by the evidence to date, there is very little hope of these Western goals being achieved in the future.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.