Follow us on social

google cta
2019-10-31t000000z_118279231_rc143f0c97e0_rtrmadp_3_usa-trump-impeachment-1-scaled

Why Is The #Resistance Lionizing The National Security State?

Analysis | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

Remember the Patriot Act? It still exists, and law enforcement is still widely abusing it. A key part of this authority was set to expire at the end of the year, providing an opportunity to curtail or abolish it. Yet despite the 2018 “blue wave” election that came with a promise to stop the worst of Trump’s abuses, the Democratic-led House of Representatives just quietly voted to extend it, with no reforms.

Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised. As an experiment, do a quick Twitter search to find users who proudly label themselves as part of the #Resistance but also invoke another hashtag: #ILoveTheFBI. You’ll find quite a few examples. It’s a bizarre phenomenon of the Trump era—with an unpopular president whose unhinged rants frequently include screeds against “the Deep State,” confidence in the national security apparatus is soaring by contrast. But while blind allegiance to these institutions might find some success in scoring points against Trump, it only enables Trumpism more broadly.

On one level, this trend is understandable, particularly among newly-activated voters reeling from the 2016 election and grasping for a return to perceived normalcy. Donald Trump frequently peddles conspiracy theories and attacks, including claims that he was a victim of illegal surveillance, that there’s a partisan conspiracy against him at the FBI, that investigations into his misdeeds are “witch hunts,” something about “unmasking,” warrants, and Carter Page...the list is seemingly endless.

This is all counterfactual and quite silly, of course. But the opposing response has been worrisome, too. Figures like former FBI directors James Comey and Robert Mueller have been elevated to hero status (including, inexplicably, a children’s book featuring Mueller in a Chippendale outfit). Former CIA directors John Brennan and Michael Hayden fill the airwaves of ostensibly “liberal” cable news programming. Bill Maher led an applause tribute to the FBI and CIA on his show. Celebrities implore fans to “cherish” the CIA. At various points, military leaders in the administration like John Kelly or Jim Mattis have been relied upon as the “adults in the room” to save us from the worst of Trump’s impulses.

But here’s the problem: the creeping authoritarianism, lawlessness, and human rights disasters exemplified so clearly by Trump have long existed in the U.S. government, mostly in the shadowy crevices of the national security state that’s now being lionized. The FBI and CIA will not save us from Trump. They helped give us Trump.

It’s a form of privilege to think that things were okay in the pre-Trump era, or at least okay enough that we should return there as soon as possible as a first step to fixing this mess. But merely turning back the clock isn’t going to cut it. As abuses in the name of national security disproportionately impact racial and religious minorities, communities under attack at home and around the world have long been well aware of the dangers that come when we fail to critique or limit the power of the security state.

It wasn’t so long ago that federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies colluded to operate a covert torture program that was illegal, brutal, and—not that it matters—completely ineffective. They lied to the administration, Congress, and the American people and are still fighting to keep the totality of their crimes under cover (by the way, don’t miss the new film The Report to get caught up on and really angry about this recent history). That’s part and parcel, though: for decades the CIA has worked to overthrow and assassinate abroad, while the FBI has terrorized dissidents, activists, and communities of color here at home.

Before taking up residence as an MSNBC contributor reliably issuing anti-Trump zingers, John Brennan played a supportive role in torture and targeted killings. Michael Hayden led a secretive, illegal mass surveillance network. John Kelly managed the indefinite detention camp at Guantanamo and Mattis oversaw civilian massacres in Iraq. Robert Mueller’s testimony helped get us into the Iraq War and his FBI leadership oversaw rounding up and detaining Muslim men on bogus charges post-9/11.

The point is that, while of course there are civil servants working in good faith within the system who are totally undeserving of Trump’s erratic attacks, we must be clear-eyed about our own history if we’re to have a better future. The answer to Trumpism isn’t unchecked faith in the security state, it’s transformational reform that centers the rule of law and accountability to the people.

If ever there was a time to rein in the power of the national security state, it’s now, when the self-described resistance holds some power under a dangerous president embattled in an impeachment scandal. It’s time for our elected representatives to lead the way not in protecting the norms, but in creating new norms that truly make our communities secure.


Former CIA director John Brennan, former CIA deputy director John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director Michael Morell and former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe, speak during a forum on election security titled, “2020 Vision: Intelligence and the U.S. Presidential Election” at the National Press Club in Washington, U.S., October 30, 2019. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY
google cta
Analysis | Washington Politics
G7 Summit
Top photo credit: May 21, 2023, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan: (From R to L) Comoros' President Azali Assoumani, World Trade Organization (WTO) Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan. (Credit Image: © POOL via ZUMA Press Wire)

Middle Powers are setting the table so they won't be 'on the menu'

Asia-Pacific

The global order was already fragmenting before Donald Trump returned to the White House. But the upended “rules” of global economic and foreign policies have now reached a point of no return.

What has changed is not direction, but speed. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s remarks in Davos last month — “Middle powers must act together, because if we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu” — captured the consequences of not acting quickly. And Carney is not alone in those fears.

keep readingShow less
Vice President JD Vance Azerbaijan Armenia
U.S. Vice President JD Vance gets out of a car before boarding Air Force Two upon departure for Azerbaijan, at Zvartnots International Airport in Yerevan, Armenia, February 10, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

VP Vance’s timely TRIPP to the South Caucasus

Washington Politics

Vice President JD Vance’s regional tour to Armenia and Azerbaijan this week — the highest level visit by an American official to the South Caucasus since Vice President Joe Biden went to Georgia in 2009 — demonstrates that Washington is not ignoring Yerevan and Baku and is taking an active role in their normalization process.

Vance’s stop in Armenia included an announcement that Yerevan has procured $11 million in U.S. defense systems — a first — in particular Shield AI’s V-BAT, an ISR unmanned aircraft system. It was also announced that the second stage of a groundbreaking AI supercomputer project led by Firebird, a U.S.-based AI cloud and infrastructure company, would commence after having secured American licensing for the sale and delivery of an additional 41,000 NVIDIA GB300 graphics processing units.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.