Follow us on social

'Always at War' strives to answer the question: why?

'Always at War' strives to answer the question: why?

Quincy Institute makes its podcast debut with a show that probes the hidden matrix of interlocking interests that fuels American militarism

Reporting | QiOSK

The United States is a country at war. As I write, the U.S. is bombing Yemen, supplying weapons to Israel as it annihilates Gaza, conducting counter-terrorism operations in dozens of countries, and fighting a proxy war against Russia in Ukraine. Meanwhile, President Trump suggests he would go to war with Iran “very willingly” if nuclear diplomacy collapses.

As we stare down another potential forever war in the greater Middle East, a crucial question is raised: Why is the U.S. always at war?

The answer lies in a complex web of financial incentives and political calculations. This hidden matrix of interlocking interests that perpetuates America's war machine is precisely what the Quincy Institute's new YouTube show, "Always at War," investigates.

For Americans born after 1990, war isn't an anomaly — it's been the backdrop of their entire lives. And these conflicts haven’t just wrought destruction abroad — they’ve reshaped American society. In the wake of our endless wars, Americans’ civil liberties eroded, our police have militarized, and resources that could have been used to address domestic needs were diverted to the Pentagon, which looks set to spend nearly $1 trillion annually.

The money we allocate to defense is simply staggering: the U.S. government has spent $8 trillion on post-9/11conflicts as defense CEOs earn $25 million yearly and weapons manufacturers see 82% returns, amid recent conflicts.

But equally important are the political incentives that reward hawkishness and punish restraint.

When 80% of retired four-star generals join defense companies within five years and over 50 members of Congress own stocks in these same companies, we can plainly see the financial incentives that fuel American militarism. And there's also a powerful ecosystem of think tanks, media outlets, and political operatives that secure career advancements for those championing military solutions as they marginalize voices of those advocating for restraint.

“Always at War” aims to make this deliberately confusing system comprehensible.

The debut episodes feature the Quincy Institute’s William Hartung discussing America's nuclear weapons programs, especially its costly "Sentinel Program," and historian and Quincy Institute co-founder Andrew Bacevich, who draws parallels between the Vietnam War and today's ruinous interventions.

By revealing who benefits — both financially and politically — when America chooses war over peace, "Always at War" seeks to help viewers understand why the United States seems perpetually unable to stop participating in violent conflicts. Understanding these forces is the first step toward building a foreign policy based on restraint, diplomacy, and genuine national interest rather than profit and political advantage.

Watch now:


YouTube
Reporting | QiOSK
Afghan deportations Iran
Afghan nationals, who were deported from Iran, wait to board a bus upon their arrival at the Islam Qala border crossing in Herat province, Afghanistan, July 22, 2025. REUTERS/Sayed Hassib
signal-2025-08-28-165306_002

Millions of Afghans forced to return to a hellscape the world forgot

Middle East

It’s been a dark summer for Afghans. When Israel launched the 12-day war with Iran on June 13, Tehran used it as a pretext to scapegoat some of its most vulnerable residents.

In its latest wave of deportations, an estimated 700,000 Afghans have returned to Afghanistan since Iran began expulsions that month. Then on July 31, Pakistan launched the third phase of its “Illegal Foreigners Repatriation Plan,” announced in 2023, arresting and detaining Afghans across the country.

keep readingShow less
Thomas Barrack
Top image credit: U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and U.S. special envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack speaks after meeting with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (not pictured) at the presidential palace in Baabda, Lebanon August 26, 2025. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir

Tom Barrack has an offer that Lebanon simply can't refuse

Middle East

A tale of two envoys recently unfolded in Beirut, encapsulating the crossroads at which Lebanon now stands. Tanned and sporting a pink tie, the U.S. Envoy Tom Barrack arrived with Deputy Special Presidential Envoy to the Middle East, Morgan Ortagus in mid-August. Their meetings with top Lebanese officials underscored Washington’s insistence that lasting stability in Lebanon depends on consolidating state authority, and disarming Hezbollah.

Days earlier, Ali Larijani, the head of Iran’s National Security Council, had departed, leaving a message equally blunt but diametrically opposed: Hezbollah’s arms are a red line and are necessary tools for its “resistance” to Israel. These visits represent the opposing magnetic poles pulling at the country.

Lebanon is reeling from a confluence of catastrophes. A devastating scuffle with Israel last year decapitated Hezbollah’s leadership and ravaged its strongholds. Compounding this military blow was a strategic amputation: the swift collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria, which severed the critical land bridge that for decades funneled Iranian arms and support to Iran’s most prized regional proxy. Into this vortex has stepped Barrack, a 40-year friend of Donald Trump and a businessman by trade, embodying a U.S. strategy that is quintessentially Trumpian in its DNA.

keep readingShow less
Afghanistan withdrawal
Lloyd Austin, Kenneth McKenzie, and Mark Milley in 2021. (MSNBC screengrab)

Turns out leaving Afghanistan did not unleash terror on US or region

Military Industrial Complex

It will be four years since the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan on Aug. 30, 2021, ending a nearly 20-year occupation that could serve as a poster child for mission creep.

What began in October 2001 as a narrow intervention to destroy al-Qaeda, the terrorist group that perpetrated the 9/11 attacks, and topple the Taliban government for refusing to hand over al-Qaeda’s leader, Osama bin Laden, morphed into an open-ended nation-building operation that killed 2,334 U.S. military personnel and wounded over 20,000 more.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.