Follow us on social

 Robert Menendez

The top five foreign influence fails of 2024

From bribes to handbags, the US saw unprecedented levels of overt and covert ops that the media barely noticed

Analysis | Washington Politics

2024 was a big year for foreign influence in the U.S., in all the worst ways.

Hundreds of millions of dollars poured into the nation’s top lobbying and public relations firms from foreign powers in 2024. The final numbers aren’t in yet, but we’re already seeing 8-figure spending from America’s allies (like Japan and Australia), adversaries (like China), and whatever Turkey and Saudi Arabia are these days.

Though my colleagues and I at the Quincy Institute continued to write story after story about all this foreign lobbying, most mainstream media outlets paid little heed to this perfectly legal system that allows foreign powers to mold U.S. foreign policy as they see fit.

Illicit foreign influence operations, however, really had a banner year (congratulations corruption, you did it!) and garnered immense media attention. There was rampant evidence of attempted foreign meddling in the 2024 elections and at least a dozen people were either convicted, indicted, or reached prosecution agreements related to violating the U.S.’s preeminent law for regulating foreign influence in America, the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).

In the biggest stories of all, several prominent political figures faced accusations of covertly doing the bidding of foreign governments. Plus, we’re still waiting to see if former Fugees star Pras Michél, who was convicted in 2023 of engaging in an illicit foreign influence campaign on behalf of Chinese interests, will face the maximum 22-year sentence or if it will get reduced to something shorter and perhaps he’ll just be “Gone till November.”

Needless to say, there was heavy competition to make it into the top 5 foreign influence fails of 2024, but here they are:

5. A think-tanker got some expensive handbags and the Justice Department was NOT having it.

In July, DOJ indicted long-time think tanker and Korean Peninsula expert, Sue Mi Terry, for acting as an unregistered foreign agent for South Korea. Terry’s alleged transgressions included doing favors for South Korean spies in exchange for $37,000 in a think tank “gift” account she controlled and some pretty swanky handbags from Bottega Veneta and Louis Vuitton that cost around $3,000 each.

Greg Craig — who served as White House counsel during the Obama administration, is a prominent FARA critic, and was also previously accused of violating FARA — raised objections to Terry’s indictment, referring to the handbags as “trinkets,” without explaining exactly how much foreign corruption he would be okay with. But, if he’s willing to excuse gold bars, piles of cash, and luxury cars from foreign governments, some of our other top 5 contenders might be off the hook too. Stay tuned!

The lesson: buy your own $3,000 “trinkets.”

4. The Israeli government ran big, illicit foreign influence campaigns in the U.S … and nobody cared.

The New York Times and The Guardian reported this summer that Israel attempted to covertly silence critics and influence key members of the U.S. Congress on issues related to the war in Gaza. What was the U.S. government's response to these $10 million+ illicit influence ops? Nothing. Well, next to nothing.

A couple members of Congress raised concerns, most notably, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), who sarcastically wondered what prominent pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC thought of the whole ordeal (“Not something allies should do, right? Right, ⁦@AIPAC? ⁦@AIPAC?”) Despite Pocan’s protests, the Israeli government got exactly what it wanted from the U.S. — namely $17.9 billion in military aid. So, the fail here isn’t Israel’s, it’s that the DOJ hasn’t announced any investigation into Israel’s illicit influence ops and, in fact, no Biden administration official has even bothered to wave a finger at Israel for this brazen attempt to meddle in America.

The lesson: Apparently, it’s perfectly fine for America’s friends to meddle in its democracy.

3. A sitting member of Congress was indicted for allegedly taking bribes from Azerbaijan.

“Bribery, unlawful foreign influence, and money laundering,” are words probably no elected official wants mentioned in the same sentence as their name, but those were exactly the charges levied by the DOJ against the sitting Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) on May 3, 2024. Cuellar allegedly accepted bribes from a state-owned Azerbaijani oil company and a Mexican bank to push U.S. foreign policy in their favor. Cuellar — referred to as “boss” by his Azerbaijani handler — is still in Congress and just won re-election.

The lesson: if you’re a member of Congress and you’re going to take bribes from a foreign government, well, don’t. But, if you must, maybe don’t make it so obvious by co-chairing the congressional caucus that focuses on the bribing government.

2. Mayor introduces trash cans … and unprecedented foreign bribery scandal to New York City.

In the summer of 2024, New York City Mayor Eric Adams nearly broke the internet when he introduced the next step in the Big Apple’s “Trash Revolution” — a trash can. The mayor was eviscerated by internet trolls for seemingly discovering trash cans in 2024. But Adams' year would get much, much worse just two months later, when the Justice Department indicted him for illicit ties to the government of Turkey and Turkish companies. The indictment includes allegations of wire fraud, bribery, and receiving illegal campaign contributions from foreign nationals. Adams now holds the ignominious title of being the only NYC mayor to be charged with a crime while in office. And, Adams' legal woes may not be over, as he is also allegedly under investigation for illicit ties to five other countries: China, Israel, Qatar, South Korea, and Uzbekistan.

The lesson: trash cans are pretty awesome! For the low cost of $1.6 million, McKinsey agrees.

1. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman is convicted of foreign bribery.

Gold bars, piles of cash, a Mercedes — the conviction this summer of Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) truly had it all. “This case has always been about shocking levels of corruption…This wasn’t politics as usual; this was politics for profit,” U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said following Menendez’s conviction.

That conviction ended up being something of a slam-dunk for the U.S. attorneys due in no small part to Menendez himself seemingly bumbling through the whole corruption scheme (he literally googled, “kilo of gold price,” after receiving a gold bar as a bribe). And, Menendez wasn’t just any senator — he was the most powerful person in the Senate when it comes to U.S. foreign policy, as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which oversees war powers, treaties, troop deployments, military aid, and many other foreign policy issues.

Lesson: if you accept a gold bar as a bribe — again, please don’t accept bribes — but if you must, DO NOT immediately google the value of a gold bar. It’s not a good look…and it can land you in jail.


Top image credit: U.S. Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ), arrives at Federal Court, for his bribery trial in connection with an alleged corrupt relationship with three New Jersey businessmen, in New York City, U.S., May 16, 2024. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly
Analysis | Washington Politics
Lockheed Martin NASA
Top photo credit: Lockheed Martin Space Systems in Littleton, Colo. Photo Credit: (NASA/Joel Kowsky)

The Pentagon spent $4 trillion over 5 years. Contractors got 54% of it.

Military Industrial Complex

Advocates of ever-higher Pentagon spending frequently argue that we must throw more money at the department to “support the troops.” But recent budget proposals and a new research paper issued by the Quincy Institute and the Costs of War Project at Brown University suggest otherwise.

The paper, which I co-authored with Stephen Semler, found that 54% of the Pentagon’s $4.4 trillion in discretionary spending from 2020 to 2024 went to military contractors. The top five alone — Lockheed Martin ($313 billion), RTX (formerly Raytheon, $145 billion), Boeing ($115 billion), General Dynamics ($116 billion), and Northrop Grumman ($81 billion) – received $771 billion in Pentagon contracts over that five year period.

keep readingShow less
China Malaysia
Top photo credit: Pearly Tan and Thinaah Muralitharan of Malaysia compete in the Women's Doubles Round Robin match against Nami Matsuyama and Chiharu Shida of Japan on day five of the BWF Sudirman Cup Finals 2025 at Fenghuang Gymnasium on May 1, 2025 in Xiamen, Fujian Province of China. (Photo by Zheng Hongliang/VCG )

How China is 'eating our lunch' with soft power

Asia-Pacific

In June 2025, while U.S. and Philippine forces conducted joint military drills in the Sulu Sea and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reaffirmed America’s commitment to the Indo-Pacific at Singapore’s Shangri-La Dialogue, another story deserving of attention played out less visibly.

A Chinese-financed rail project broke ground in Malaysia with diplomatic fanfare and local celebration. As Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim noted, the ceremony “marks an important milestone” in bilateral cooperation. The contrast was sharp: Washington sent ships and speeches; Beijing sent people and money.

keep readingShow less
President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev and President of Russia Vladimir Putin
Top photo credit: President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev and President of Russia Vladimir Putin appear on screen. (shutterstock/miss.cabul)

Westerners foolishly rush to defend Azerbaijan against Russia

Europe

The escalating tensions between Russia and Azerbaijan — marked by tit-for-tat arrests, accusations of ethnic violence, and economic sparring — have tempted some Western observers to view the conflict as an opportunity to further isolate Moscow.

However, this is not a simple narrative of Azerbaijan resisting Russian dominance. It is a complex struggle over energy routes, regional influence, and the future of the South Caucasus, where Western alignment with Baku risks undermining critical priorities, including potential U.S.-Russia engagement on Ukraine and arms control.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.