Follow us on social

google cta
Crowds at US-backed aid distribution center in Gaza

US contractors lose control amid meltdown at new aid center in Gaza

Security team fired shots to disperse crowd — or not — depending on conflicting reports

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

UPDATE 5/28: The Washington Post is reporting today that some 47 people were injured, most of them from gunshots, in the mayhem that ensued at a new food distribution site in Gaza yesterday. A United Nations spokesperson said the gunshots appeared to come from Israeli military but an investigation for full verification is ongoing.



U.S. private contractors charged with securing controversial new Israeli aid-distribution centers in Gaza reportedly lost control of the crowds and fired live ammunition to disperse throngs of civilians described as “desperate to get food to feed their families," according to Al Jazeera.

Al Jazeera reported Tuesday that IDF forces were then sent in “to try and evacuate these contractors.” Al Jazeera also reported that military helicopters and tanks fired into the vicinity “to try and also get the crowds to disperse.” An AP journalist based in the area also reported sounds of Israeli tankfire and gunfire.

Meanwhile, a security source told CNN that U.S. contractors did not fire shots.

At the time of this writing, it is unclear whether the incident as a whole resulted in injuries or fatalities, though Middle East Eye has reported it caused a “deadly stampede.”

In response, the controversial U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which facilitates the new distribution sites, claimed that the volume of crowds overwhelmed its team and forced it to pull back so that people could “take aid safely and dissipate.” It alleged that “Gazans experienced several hour delays in accessing the site due to blockades imposed by Hamas.”

According to Haaretz, aid distribution by the Gaza-Humanitarian Foundation has resumed on site following the incident, though a source told CNN that aid distribution would resume there tomorrow. Haaretz also reported that the Israeli army denies reports suggesting that IDF helicopters opened fire at the aid hubs, insisting that troops on scene fired warning shots.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation began operating its aid-distribution centers in Gaza yesterday, despite objections from the U.N. and other aid groups that the Foundation was assisting Israel’s efforts to use food as a weapon of war. After breaking a temporary ceasefire in Gaza, Israel had blocked foodstuffs, fuel, and other goods for almost three months, until finally allowing a small amount of aid to enter the Gaza Strip last week.

The New York Times reported over the weekend that the aid scheme has been in the works since shortly after the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks and has been assisted by ex-CIA officer Phillip R. Reilly, who has had a long career dating back to training the contras in Nicaragua in the 1980s. The Foundation is registered in both Switzerland and the U.S. Retired Marine Jake Wood was appointed CEO in charge of fundraising until he resigned Monday, saying “It is clear that it is not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence, which I will not abandon.”

After the clash with the crowds Tuesday, the Government Media Office in Gaza put out a statement saying, "today’s events are clear evidence of the occupation’s failure to manage the humanitarian crisis it has deliberately created…Establishing ghettos for distributing limited aid is a deliberate policy aimed at sustaining starvation and dismantling society.”

Drop Site news, meanwhile, said that the aid-distribution centers in Gaza may be used to detain Palestinians. They reported that an elderly man has gone missing after failing to provide information on a relative during questioning at the Muraj Crossing. As of this writing, that report has not yet been confirmed.

The U.S. State Department did not respond to request for comment in time for publication.

Editor's note: This article is being updated according to ongoing developments.


Top Image Credit: Middle East Eye: Chaos over aid in Gaza. Remembering the forgotten Uyghurs (Screenshot -- YouTube)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.