Follow us on social

Trump's refugee ban is endangering US Afghan allies

Trump's refugee ban is endangering US Afghan allies

The legal situation is unclear but veterans say the freeze on resettlement ops has already caused life threatening delays

Analysis | Reporting | Middle East

Afghans who worked for the U.S. military are still fleeing the Taliban and trying to reach the United States- President Trump's ban on refugees has put their lives, literally, in limbo.

They got a hopeful sign Tuesday when a federal judge blocked President Trump’s executive order suspending the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), a federal program that processes and resettles people fleeing dangerous humanitarian crises abroad.

But a lawyer for the Justice Department has already asked U.S. District Judge Jamal Whitehead to refrain from enforcing his block while the administration considers appealing the case. Whitehead said he will decide on that later, when he issues a formal written order.

Meanwhile, in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, more than 1,600 former U.S. military allies are waiting for their sanctuary.

Despite the pleas of military veteran groups, Trump’s executive order did not explicitly offer protections for the Afghan Special Immigrant Visa (SIV), a resettlement program created by Congress for Afghan citizens who aided the U.S. mission in Afghanistan — including former military interpreters, contractors, and prosecutors who put Taliban members in prison. Now stranded, these SIV applicants (many of them already vetted for resettlement by the U.S. government) risk violent retribution from the Taliban.

Created in 2006, the Afghan SIV program initially allowed for just 50 visas to be granted per year. That number was increased to around 4,000 in 2009 and then to 26,500 in 2021 after the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan. The latest round of SIV authorizations is set to expire at the end of 2025 and will require reauthorization from Congress.

Trump’s refugee pause hasn’t stopped the processing of SIV applications, but it has cut off crucial pathways for applicants to reach the United States once approved.

Though SIV is technically a separate program from the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, its applicants rely on many of the same offices and funding pools that have since been frozen by Trump’s executive order. These include the U.N.’s International Office of Migration and the State Department’s Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts, both of which arrange relocation flights for SIV applicants.

Recent cuts have also forced the closure of resettlement agencies in Qatar and Pakistan, where many Afghans are vetted before coming to the United States. In Pakistan, local authorities are now ramping up efforts to deport refugees back to Afghanistan, which for many would be a death sentence.

Trump made President Biden’s Afghanistan withdrawal a central part of his foreign policy argument during his re-election campaign, calling Biden’s exit, “the most astonishing display of gross incompetence by a nation’s leader, perhaps at any time.” Republicans in Congress excoriated Biden for failing to ensure the safety of former military partners during the Afghanistan withdrawal process.

Now military veterans fear that Trump is now doing the same by failing to honor the SIV program.

“The word spreads and it damages our reputation overseas,” said retired Air Force Lieutenant General John Bradley, whose Lamia Afghan Foundation helps to resettle Afghan refugees.

President Trump has not made any public statements about the status of SIV since issuing his executive order, but pro-Afghan advocates hope that they can elevate the issue by raising bipartisan support. According to the bipartisan veterans PAC With Honor, 84% of Americans say they support resettling Afghan veterans in the U.S.

“Lots of members of congress understand that these people helped our military,” said General Bradley.

Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee expressed concern last week that former U.S. allies in Afghanistan are being impacted by the refugee pause.

“During its chaotic and deadly withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Biden administration abandoned tens of thousands of our Afghan allies who fought and bled alongside our military,” McCaul said in a Feb. 20 press release on Trump’s cuts to the State Department.

“I urge Secretary Rubio to prioritize honoring the promises we made to those Afghan allies as he works to make State a more effective and efficient department.”

Earlier this month, a group of Democratic senators led by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) called on the administration to clarify the status of SIV applicants currently in limbo.

“We write with urgent concerns about potential impacts of the Administration’s recent immigration and foreign aid orders on Afghans who supported the U.S. mission in Afghanistan,” said the senators in a letter to key Trump cabinet officials on Feb. 20. “Standing by those who stood with us is a matter of national interest and national honor.”


Top photo: U.S. Army Lt. Col. Timothy McGuire and his interpreter, right, speak with a recent Afghan National Army graduate, left, during a visit in Seghana, Afghanistan (U.S Army photo by Pfc. Michael Zuk)
Analysis | Reporting | Middle East
Daniel Davis
Top photo credit: Ret. Lt. Col. Daniel Davis (FOX Business screenshot)

Mr. Trump, you would've been lucky to have Dan Davis on your team

QiOSK

Earlier today the Jewish Insider magazine ran a story saying that the White House tapped retired Lt. Col. Danny Davis for Deputy Director of National Intelligence, working under the newly confirmed DNI Tulsi Gabbard. It was a hit piece by a pro-Israel platform that primarily focused on Davis's critical views — published only in articles and on his popular podcast — on Gaza and Iran.

Within hours, he was informed there would be no job, Responsible Statecraft has confirmed. "Investigative journalist" Laura Loomer celebrated. We are sure neoconservative radio jock Mark Levin, who helped spread the Insider story to his 4.9 million followers on Wednesday, celebrated. We should not. President Trump should not.

keep readingShow less
Adam Smith
Top image credit: https://www.youtube.com/@QuincyInst

Top House Dem: Party's embrace of hawks 'is a problem'

QiOSK

A senior Democratic lawmaker on Wednesday said it was ‘a problem’ that many in his party have been trying to out-hawk Republicans on foreign policy and that Democrats need to be more aggressive in advocating for diplomacy approaches abroad, particularly with respect to China.

During a discussion hosted by the Quincy Institute — RS’s publisher — with House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash), QI executive vice president Trita Parsi wondered why — pointing to Vice President Kamala Harris campaigning for president with Liz Cheney and Sen. Elissa Slotkin’s (D-Mich.) recent embrace of Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy — the Democratic Party has shifted away from promoting diplomacy, opposing “stupid wars,” and celebrating multilateralism.

keep readingShow less
Zelensky Putin
Top photo credit: Volodymyr Zelensky (Shutterstock/Pararazza) and Vladimir Putin (Shutterstock/miss.cabul)

No, a ceasefire is not a ‘bad deal’ for Russia

Europe

The Trump administration has so far played its cards in the Ukraine peace process with great skill. Pressure on Kyiv has led the Ukrainian government to abandon its impossible demands and join the U.S. in calling for an unconditional temporary ceasefire.

This call, together with the resumption of U.S. military and intelligence aid to Ukraine, is now putting great pressure on the Russian government to abandon its own impossible demands and seek a genuine and early compromise. A sign of the intensity of this pressure is the anguish it is causing to Russian hardliners, who are demanding that Putin firmly reject the proposal. We must hope that he will not listen to them.

keep readingShow less

Trump transition

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.