Follow us on social

2022-07-16t115330z_1677024153_rc2tcv9xjs4g_rtrmadp_3_usa-saudi

Saudi Arabia's bid for control of the PGA isn't just about golf

As Congress begins hearings into the LIV merger, it must also reckon with Riyadh's larger effort to silence American critics with cash.

Analysis | Middle East

On July 11, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will hold a hearing on the proposed merger of PGA Tours with the Saudi government-owned LIV Golf. As committee chair Senator Blumenthal explained, the hearing will seek to “uncover what went into the PGA Tour’s deal with the Saudi Public Investment Fund and what the Saudi takeover means for the future of this cherished American institution and our national interest.”

The hearing itself is an important acknowledgement that the national security implications of this merger go well beyond the business of sports. What’s at stake isn’t merely the future of golfing, or even concerns raised by foreign ownership of a national sporting institution, but the drip, drip, drip acquisition of our country’s political, social, cultural, and economic assets by a ruthless dictatorship, headed by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, or MBS.

We still don’t know exactly how the new golfing entity created by the merger will be governed, what its ownership structure will look like, or for how much the board is selling off PGA Tours. We do know that Saudi government’s $650 billion Public Investment Fund (PIF), chaired by MBS and effectively serving as his personal kitty, is doing the buying, and that the new entity will be chaired by MBS’s right-hand man and PIF governor, Yasir al-Rumayyan. Dodging public scrutiny, al-Rumayyan, the chairman-to-be of the new entity, has declined a request to appear at the hearing, citing “scheduling conflicts.”

It was only due to leaks during the LIV-PGA-PIV litigation that we learned of Saudi’s 93 percent ownership of LIV Golf and responsibility for all of the franchise’s liabilities. This includes LIV Golf’s undisclosed millions in payments to Donald Trump’s golf resorts, raising serious national security implications of their own, effectively allowing the dictator of a foreign country to launder payments to a former American president — and now again presidential candidate.

While in power, Trump very dutifully promoted close ties with Saudi Arabia, vetoed efforts to block arms sales to the country, and most significantly, protected MBS while in power, boasting about “saving his ass” from accountability for Jamal Khashoggi’s murder. To no one’s surprise, the Department of Justice is now investigating Trump’s ties to the Saudi fund and LIV as part of its prosecution of Trump’s theft of classified documents, which reportedly include classified information valuable to Saudi Arabia.

The Saudi government’s total acquisition of U.S. golf is just the tip of the iceberg in its unprecedented investments, including significant ownership stakes, over the past few years in American economic, cultural and social assets, including technology, banking, defense, sports, entertainment, gaming, news, film, and arts. These investments will naturally expand Saudi influence and control in the American economy.

This isn’t just about an expanded capacity to “sportswash” or “artswash,” distracting Americans from the Saudi government’s atrocious human rights record. These stakes give the Saudi government much more direct leverage, with power to block any repeat American protest and withdrawal from engagement with Saudi Arabia, such as what happened in the wake of Khashoggi’s murder. When new abuses emerge, as they inevitably will under the country’s reckless, sociopathic dictator, many American businesses, celebrities, sports stars, and institutions will be forced to remain silent, just as Saudi citizens are, bowing to their paymaster.

More dangerous still is Saudi Arabia’s outright purchase of power in our political system. While the defense industry has long been renowned for influence in government via its revolving door employment of former officials, it’s no match for Saudi Arabia’s spending power, with eye-popping PIF payouts to former Trump administration officials, including $2 billion to Trump’s son-in-law and former senior adviser Jared Kushner, and $1 billion to former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.

Defense industries also can’t match the salaries and business deals that Saudi Arabia is paying to hundreds of former U.S. military officials, including 15 former U.S. generals and admirals serving as “consultants” since 2015. This is hardly a Republicans-only problem: which Biden administration official is willing to pledge that they won’t ever take a paycheck from Saudi Arabia when they leave office?

The Senate hearing would do well to expand its investigation for a more holistic scrutiny of the national security implications of all these Saudi acquisitions and the impact they will have on the independence and freedom of American businesses, institutions and government officials to make decisions and take actions that serve our own interests and values.

The message that Saudi Arabia — and other wealthy dictatorships in the Gulf, like the UAE and Bahrain — is sending us, the message too many Americans have been only too eager to accept, is that our economy is for sale, our institutions are for sale, and our government is for sale. The ultimate win for a dictator like MBS is to show the world that he can buy our democracy. It’s up to our government to take the actions and pass the laws we need to save it.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman attends an Arab summit, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, July 16, 2022. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
Analysis | Middle East
The Ukraine War at two years: By the numbers


KYIV, UKRAINE - July 12, 2023: Destroyed and burned Russian military tanks and parts of equipment are exhibited at the Mykhailivska square in Kyiv city centre. (Oleksandr Popenko/Shutterstock)

The Ukraine War at two years: By the numbers

Europe

Two years ago on Feb. 24, 2022, the world watched as Russian tanks rolled into the outskirts of Kyiv and missiles struck the capital city.

Contrary to initial predictions, Kyiv never fell, but the country today remains embroiled in conflict. The front line holds in the southeastern region of the country, with contested areas largely focused on the Russian-speaking Donbas and port cities around the Black Sea.

keep readingShow less
Navalny's death shouldn't close off talks with Putin

A woman lays flowers at the monument to the victims of political repressions following the death of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, in Moscow, Russia February 16, 2024. REUTERS/Stringer

Navalny's death shouldn't close off talks with Putin

Analysis

President Biden was entirely correct in the first part of his judgment on the death of Alexei Navalny: “Putin is responsible, whether he ordered it, or he is responsible for the circumstances he put that man in.” Even if Navalny eventually died of “natural causes,” his previous poisoning, and the circumstances of his imprisonment, must obviously be considered as critical factors in his death.

For his tremendous courage in returning to Russia after his medical treatment in the West — knowing well the dangers that he faced — the memory of Navalny should be held in great honor. He joins the immense list of Russians who have died for their beliefs at the hands of the state. Public expressions of anger and disgust at the manner of his death are justified and correct.

keep readingShow less
Big US investors prop up the nuclear weapons industry

ProStockStudio via shutterstock.com

Big US investors prop up the nuclear weapons industry

Military Industrial Complex

Nuclear weapons aren’t just a threat to human survival, they’re a multi-billion-dollar business supported by some of the biggest institutional investors in the U.S. according to new data released today by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) and PAX, the largest peace organization in the Netherlands.

For the third year in a row, globally, the number of investors in nuclear weapons producers has fallen but the overall amount invested in these companies has increased, largely thanks to some of the biggest investment banks and funds in the U.S.

keep readingShow less

Israel-Gaza Crisis

Latest