Follow us on social

2022-07-16t115330z_1677024153_rc2tcv9xjs4g_rtrmadp_3_usa-saudi

Saudi Arabia's bid for control of the PGA isn't just about golf

As Congress begins hearings into the LIV merger, it must also reckon with Riyadh's larger effort to silence American critics with cash.

Analysis | Middle East

On July 11, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will hold a hearing on the proposed merger of PGA Tours with the Saudi government-owned LIV Golf. As committee chair Senator Blumenthal explained, the hearing will seek to “uncover what went into the PGA Tour’s deal with the Saudi Public Investment Fund and what the Saudi takeover means for the future of this cherished American institution and our national interest.”

The hearing itself is an important acknowledgement that the national security implications of this merger go well beyond the business of sports. What’s at stake isn’t merely the future of golfing, or even concerns raised by foreign ownership of a national sporting institution, but the drip, drip, drip acquisition of our country’s political, social, cultural, and economic assets by a ruthless dictatorship, headed by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, or MBS.

We still don’t know exactly how the new golfing entity created by the merger will be governed, what its ownership structure will look like, or for how much the board is selling off PGA Tours. We do know that Saudi government’s $650 billion Public Investment Fund (PIF), chaired by MBS and effectively serving as his personal kitty, is doing the buying, and that the new entity will be chaired by MBS’s right-hand man and PIF governor, Yasir al-Rumayyan. Dodging public scrutiny, al-Rumayyan, the chairman-to-be of the new entity, has declined a request to appear at the hearing, citing “scheduling conflicts.”

It was only due to leaks during the LIV-PGA-PIV litigation that we learned of Saudi’s 93 percent ownership of LIV Golf and responsibility for all of the franchise’s liabilities. This includes LIV Golf’s undisclosed millions in payments to Donald Trump’s golf resorts, raising serious national security implications of their own, effectively allowing the dictator of a foreign country to launder payments to a former American president — and now again presidential candidate.

While in power, Trump very dutifully promoted close ties with Saudi Arabia, vetoed efforts to block arms sales to the country, and most significantly, protected MBS while in power, boasting about “saving his ass” from accountability for Jamal Khashoggi’s murder. To no one’s surprise, the Department of Justice is now investigating Trump’s ties to the Saudi fund and LIV as part of its prosecution of Trump’s theft of classified documents, which reportedly include classified information valuable to Saudi Arabia.

The Saudi government’s total acquisition of U.S. golf is just the tip of the iceberg in its unprecedented investments, including significant ownership stakes, over the past few years in American economic, cultural and social assets, including technology, banking, defense, sports, entertainment, gaming, news, film, and arts. These investments will naturally expand Saudi influence and control in the American economy.

This isn’t just about an expanded capacity to “sportswash” or “artswash,” distracting Americans from the Saudi government’s atrocious human rights record. These stakes give the Saudi government much more direct leverage, with power to block any repeat American protest and withdrawal from engagement with Saudi Arabia, such as what happened in the wake of Khashoggi’s murder. When new abuses emerge, as they inevitably will under the country’s reckless, sociopathic dictator, many American businesses, celebrities, sports stars, and institutions will be forced to remain silent, just as Saudi citizens are, bowing to their paymaster.

More dangerous still is Saudi Arabia’s outright purchase of power in our political system. While the defense industry has long been renowned for influence in government via its revolving door employment of former officials, it’s no match for Saudi Arabia’s spending power, with eye-popping PIF payouts to former Trump administration officials, including $2 billion to Trump’s son-in-law and former senior adviser Jared Kushner, and $1 billion to former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.

Defense industries also can’t match the salaries and business deals that Saudi Arabia is paying to hundreds of former U.S. military officials, including 15 former U.S. generals and admirals serving as “consultants” since 2015. This is hardly a Republicans-only problem: which Biden administration official is willing to pledge that they won’t ever take a paycheck from Saudi Arabia when they leave office?

The Senate hearing would do well to expand its investigation for a more holistic scrutiny of the national security implications of all these Saudi acquisitions and the impact they will have on the independence and freedom of American businesses, institutions and government officials to make decisions and take actions that serve our own interests and values.

The message that Saudi Arabia — and other wealthy dictatorships in the Gulf, like the UAE and Bahrain — is sending us, the message too many Americans have been only too eager to accept, is that our economy is for sale, our institutions are for sale, and our government is for sale. The ultimate win for a dictator like MBS is to show the world that he can buy our democracy. It’s up to our government to take the actions and pass the laws we need to save it.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman attends an Arab summit, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, July 16, 2022. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
Analysis | Middle East
3216117-scaled
A U.S. Special Forces Soldier demonstrates a kneeling firing position before a live fire range, March 6, 2017 at Camp Zagre, Burkina Faso. Burkina Faso Soldiers also practiced firing in seated position, standing position, and practiced turning and firing. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Britany Slessman 3rd Special Forces Group (Airborne) Multimedia Illustrator/released)
A U.S. Special Forces Soldier demonstrates a kneeling firing position before a live fire range, March 6, 2017 at Camp Zagre, Burkina Faso. Burkina Faso Soldiers also practiced firing in seated position, standing position, and practiced turning and firing. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Britany Slessman 3rd Special Forces Group (Airborne) Multimedia Illustrator/released)

Time to terminate US counter-terrorism programs in Africa

Africa

Every so often I am reminded of how counter-productive US engagement in the world has become. Of how, after miserable failure after failure, this country’s foreign policy makers keep trying to run the globe and fail again. From the strategic defeats in Iraq and Afghanistan to the feckless effort to sway the excessive Israeli military operation in Gaza, the US has squandered its power, exceeded its capabilities, and just plain failed.

My reminder was a recent New York Times piece lamenting the failure of US efforts to keep terrorists out of the Islamic areas of West Africa.

keep readingShow less
What South Africa's new unity gov't means for US relations

South African president Cyril Ramaphosa and deputy president Paul Mashatile attend a special African National Congress (ANC) National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting in Cape Town, South Africa June 13, 2024. REUTERS/Nic Bothma

What South Africa's new unity gov't means for US relations

Africa

On May 29, South Africans went to the polls in one of this year’s most anticipated elections. In an outcome that shook the country’s political system, the ruling African National Congress (ANC), which has governed South Africa since Nelson Mandela became the country’s president following the fall of apartheid, lost its parliamentary majority for the first time since taking power in 1994.

As a result, the ANC has been forced to form a coalition with rival parties. It has forged a political alliance with the center-right, pro-business Democratic Alliance (DA) party, the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), the right-wing Patriotic Alliance (PA), and a small party called GOOD, which holds a single seat in parliament. Collectively, this coalition, which could still grow as the ANC continues to negotiate with other parties to expand its unity government, accounts for 68% of the seats in the country’s national parliament, which convenes in Cape Town. Leaning on its newly formed coalition, the ANC successfully reelected Cyril Ramaphosa as the country’s president on June 14.

keep readingShow less
How the 'war on terror' made the US Institute for Peace a sideshow

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken speaks at the launch of the U.S.-Afghan Consultative Mechanism with Special Envoy for Afghan Women, Girls, and Human Rights Rina Amiri, at the U.S. Institute of Peace, in Washington, U.S., July 28, 2022. Andrew Harnik/Pool via REUTERS

How the 'war on terror' made the US Institute for Peace a sideshow

Global Crises

This year the United States Institute of Peace is 40 years old, and most Americans and U.S. government officials have little to no awareness that Congress funds an institute of peace or understand what it does.

This lack of awareness about USIP and its anniversary this year reflects a larger problem in U.S. foreign policy: the U.S. government’s strained relationship with peacemaking.

keep readingShow less

Israel-Gaza Crisis

Latest