Follow us on social

P20180805sc-0480_1

Five years after Trump's JCPOA exit, Iran closer to bomb than ever

With President Biden seemingly now disinterested in this issue, perhaps it's time for Tehran's Arab neighbors to take over negotiations.

Analysis | Middle East

Today, May 8, is the five-year anniversary of Donald Trump's withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal. It is difficult to overstate how disastrous his exit from the agreement— and Joe Biden’s failure to re-enter it — has been for U.S. national security.

From Iran’s progress towards a nuclear weapons option and its support for Russia against Ukraine to the loss of U.S. leverage over Iran and credibility with the global community, this decision will go down in history as one of the biggest strategic screw-ups in American history.

Since Trump’s withdrawal in May, 2018, Iran has amassed enough enriched fissile material for several bombs. While its breakout time — the amount of time that Iran would need to assemble all the components necessary for one bomb — was more than one year  during the JCPOA, it is now less than 10 days. Neither U.S.-led sanctions nor Israeli assassinations have dented Iran’s nuclear advances. It’s clear now that only the JCPOA has been successful in boxing in Iran’s nuclear program. 

Meanwhile, having been betrayed by the United States, Iran has moved closer to China and Russia at a time when the U.S.’s own tensions with those powers are at a crisis point. Had the United States stayed in the agreement, Iran would very likely not be aiding Russia’s war in Ukraine today.

Moreover, Washington’s leverage with Tehran has dissipated. The United States has proven incapable of offering credible and enduring sanctions relief, while U.S. tensions with Russia and China have created new opportunities for Iran to circumvent U.S. sanctions.

In addition, in 2015, the U.S. was the gatekeeper to the international community. Washington decided which country was part of it and which was a pariah. But in today’s multipolar world, given that the United States has lost this role, Iran no longer needs Washington to shed its pariah status.

Tehran too deserves much blame for the dying state of the JCPOA. Western and Iranian diplomats have told me that Iran now wants to return to the package it rejected back in August 2022, while the U.S. and EU partners believe that Iran’s fast-growing nuclear program necessitates revisions to that text. But the prospects of reviving the negotiations are fast slipping away as the Biden administration has deprioritized this issue. Without some form of a deal, the risk of war is creeping closer.

Preventing war currently relies solely on the discipline of all actors involved — including the Israelis — from not taking dramatic escalatory steps. This is not a strategy that makes America safer.

As war inches closer, potentially triggered by Israel, other regional states are getting frustrated with Biden’s lack of interest and strategy. The president is neither handling this issue nor allowing Arab states in the region to find their own solution with Iran.

One possible way forward would be for a nuclear deal to be struck between Iran and its Arab neighbors. Georgetown University’s Ali Vaez and Vali Nasr of the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies did an excelling job of spelling out this option for Foreign Affairs this week. It is worth a shot. Indeed, if Biden won’t prioritize this issue or does not want to pay the political cost of striking a deal with the regime in Tehran, he should at least not stand in the way of regional states seeking to find their own solution.

If they succeed, restrictions will be imposed on Iran’s nuclear program that will help prevent an Iranian bomb. If they fail, America will be in no worse position than it is in today.


President Donald J. Trump signs an Executive Order in Bedminster, New Jersey, entitled “Reimposing Certain Sanctions with Respect to Iran.” (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)
Analysis | Middle East
US Marines
Top image credit: U.S. Marines with Force Reconnaissance Platoon, Maritime Raid Force, 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to clear a room during a limited scale raid exercise at Sam Hill Airfield, Queensland, Australia, June 21, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Alora Finigan)

Cartels are bad but they're not 'terrorists.' This is mission creep.

Military Industrial Complex

There is a dangerous pattern on display by the Trump administration. The president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to hold the threat and use of military force as their go-to method of solving America’s problems and asserting state power.

The president’s reported authorization for the Pentagon to use U.S. military warfighting capacity to combat drug cartels — a domain that should remain within the realm of law enforcement — represents a significant escalation. This presents a concerning evolution and has serious implications for civil liberties — especially given the administration’s parallel moves with the deployment of troops to the southern border, the use of federal forces to quell protests in California, and the recent deployment of armed National Guard to the streets of our nation’s capital.

keep readingShow less
Howard Lutnick
Top photo credit: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on CNBC, 8/26/25 (CNBC screengrab)

Is nationalizing the defense industry such a bad idea?

Military Industrial Complex

The U.S. arms industry is highly consolidated, specialized, and dependent on government contracts. Indeed, the largest U.S. military contractors are already effectively extensions of the state — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is right to point that out.

His suggestion in a recent media appearance to partially nationalize the likes of Lockheed Martin is hardly novel. The economist John Kenneth Galbraith argued for the nationalization of the largest military contractors in 1969. More recently, various academics and policy analysts have advocated for partial or full nationalization of military firms in publications including The Nation, The American Conservative, The Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), and The Seattle Journal for Social Justice.

keep readingShow less
Modi Trump
Top image credit: White House, February 2025

Trump's India problem could become a Global South crisis

Asia-Pacific

As President Trump’s second term kicked off, all signs pointed to a continued upswing in U.S.-India relations. At a White House press conference in February, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke of his vision to “Make India Great Again” and how the United States under Trump would play a central role. “When it’s MAGA plus MIGA, it becomes a mega partnership for prosperity,” Modi said.

During Trump’s first term, the two populist leaders hosted rallies for each other in their respective countries and cultivated close personal ties. Aside from the Trump-Modi bromance, U.S.-Indian relations have been on a positive trajectory for over two decades, driven in part by mutual suspicion of China. But six months into his second term, Trump has taken several actions that have led to a dramatic downturn in U.S.-India relations, with India-China relations suddenly on the rise.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.