Follow us on social

google cta
2022-07-15t161833z_263984144_rc2gcv9a9tiq_rtrmadp_3_usa-saudi

'Acceptable' versus 'unacceptable' foreign meddling in US affairs

It all seems to depend on whether the offending nation is an ally or adversary. China and Russia, watch out.

Analysis | Reporting | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

Foreign meddling in the U.S. is all the rage. In just the past two weeks the Justice Department has issued multiple indictments and won a conviction related to the foreign influence campaigns of America’s adversaries. 

While these are deeply troubling allegations of meddling in America by, in these cases, Russian and Chinese agents, America's authoritarian "friends" — including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the U.A.E. — have also been orchestrating illicit influence operations in the U.S. But, unlike Russia and China, they’ve faced little punishment for meddling in America.

On Wednesday, former Fugees rapper, Prakazrel “Pras” Michel, was convicted of orchestrating an elaborate influence operation on behalf of Malaysian financier Jho Low and attempting to extradite a Chinese government critic. 

On April 17, 40 Chinese officials were charged with running a transnational repression scheme targeting Chinese dissidents in the U.S. and two Chinese operatives were arrested for allegedly acting as agents of the Chinese government and running a secret police station in New York City — just one of more than a hundred secret police stations the Chinese government allegedly operates in foreign countries. The very next day, on April 18, Russia was in the Justice Department’s crosshairs when four U.S. citizens and three Russian intelligence officers were accused of conducting an illicit foreign influence operation in the United States since 2015 that sought to “divide Americans and interfere in elections in the United States.”

The allegations in these indictments are deeply troubling and, unfortunately, are just the latest installments in ongoing campaigns by the Russian and Chinese governments to interfere in U.S. politics and elections. While the illicit influence campaigns of America’s adversaries have, rightly, drawn the ire of Congress, America’s “friends” — including authoritarian governments in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE — have repeatedly been caught engaging in similar acts yet, unlike America’s adversaries, they’re meddling in America with near impunity. In some cases, former members of Congress and high ranking members of the military are even working for them.

On Wednesday the Senate held a hearing on the revolving door from the Department of Defense to defense contractors and foreign governments. In anticipation of the hearing, Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released data on DoD’s granting of waivers for former high-ranking U.S. military personnel seeking work with foreign governments.

As Responsible Statecraft reported, more than half of all these waivers were for work with just one country — the United Arab Emirates. While the Pentagon was granting these high-ranking officials — which included eight former generals and Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis  — approval to work with the UAE, the Emiratis were hard at work repeatedly meddling in American politics and elections. 

In fact, UAE meddling in America has risen to the level of a national security challenge. Last fall, members of Congress were briefed on a report compiled by the National Intelligence Council that documented the UAE’s myriad efforts to meddle in U.S. politics and steer U.S. foreign policy in its favor. All while DoD was unflinchingly sending the UAE our top military minds and former members of Congress, like Ileane Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), Lamar Smith (R-Tex), and Congressional staff were becoming lobbyists in the UAE’s massive legal influence operation

Not to be outdone by their friends in the UAE, the governments of Saudi Arabia and Egypt have also been meddling in America, and going to extraordinary lengths to suppress dissidents on U.S. soil. On April 17, the same day the mainstream media was laser focused on revelations of Chinese influence in America, the non-profit Freedom Initiative released a report documenting appalling Saudi and Egyptian transnational repression efforts in the U.S., “including threats of physical harm, surveilling activists and communities, hacking into phones of dissidents, and online harassment,” as well as dissidents' family members being taken hostage in Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

This follows repeated attempts by the Saudi government to interfere in U.S. elections, hiring agents at Twitter to spy on dissidents, and the Saudi embassy’s complicity in helping Saudi citizens accused of crimes in the U.S. — including murder, rape, and possession of child pornography — flee the country.

Like the UAE, Saudi Arabia has also been offering huge paychecks to former top defense officials and members of Congress willing to do the Kingdom’s bidding. Last week the Washington Post reported that retired General Keith Alexander, who also previously led the National Security Agency, received a $700,000 contract to advise Saudi Arabia on cybersecurity. 

DoD records released to Sens. Warren and Grassley, reveal that Alexander was just one of eleven former U.S. military generals that were approved to work for Saudi Arabia. Former members of Congress and their staff have also been a key part of Saudi Arabia’s legal influence operations. Most notably, former Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.) has been a registered Saudi lobbyist since 2014 and is one of the top fundraisers in the Republican Party, as my colleague Eli Clifton chronicled in Responsible Statecraft.

All told, the tools different foreign governments use to meddle in America are similar, but the U.S. responses to them are not. While Chinese provocations have helped to push the U.S. towards a war-footing with China, UAE, Saudi, and Egyptian misdeeds have been rewarded with weapons of war. In fact, they’re some of the very top recipients of U.S. foreign military sales.

This unwillingness to hold America's supposed "friends" accountable for illegal meddling leaves the U.S. vulnerable to influence attacks from all authoritarian actors, whether friend or foe. To truly defend democracy in the U.S. we must punish any malign foreign actor that seeks to meddle in America.


Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman fist bumps U.S. President Joe Biden upon his arrival at Al Salman Palace, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, July 15, 2022. Bandar Algaloud/Courtesy of Saudi Royal Court/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS PICTURE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY
google cta
Analysis | Reporting | Washington Politics
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
china trump
President Donald Trump announces the creation of a critical minerals reserve during an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC on Monday, February 2, 2026. Trump announced the creation of “Project Vault,” a rare earth stockpile to lower reliance on China for rare earths and other resources. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA

Trump vs. his China hawks

Asia-Pacific

In the year since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, China hawks have started to panic. Leading lights on U.S. policy toward Beijing now warn that Trump is “barreling toward a bad bargain” with the Chinese Communist Party. Matthew Pottinger, a key architect of Trump’s China policy in his first term, argues that the president has put Beijing in a “sweet spot” through his “baffling” policy decisions.

Even some congressional Republicans have criticized Trump’s approach, particularly following his decision in December to allow the sale of powerful Nvidia AI chips to China. “The CCP will use these highly advanced chips to strengthen its military capabilities and totalitarian surveillance,” argued Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who chairs the influential Select Committee on Competition with China.

keep readingShow less
Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?
Top image credit: bluestork/shutterstock.com

Is America still considered part of the 'Americas'?

Latin America

On January 7, the White House announced its plans to withdraw from 66 international bodies whose work it had deemed inconsistent with U.S. national interests.

While many of these organizations were international in nature, three of them were specific to the Americas — the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research, the Pan American Institute of Geography and History, and the U.N.’s Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. The decision came on the heels of the Dominican Republic postponing the X Summit of the Americas last year following disagreements over who would be invited and ensuing boycotts.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.