Follow us on social

google cta
2022-07-15t161833z_263984144_rc2gcv9a9tiq_rtrmadp_3_usa-saudi

'Acceptable' versus 'unacceptable' foreign meddling in US affairs

It all seems to depend on whether the offending nation is an ally or adversary. China and Russia, watch out.

Analysis | Reporting | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

Foreign meddling in the U.S. is all the rage. In just the past two weeks the Justice Department has issued multiple indictments and won a conviction related to the foreign influence campaigns of America’s adversaries. 

While these are deeply troubling allegations of meddling in America by, in these cases, Russian and Chinese agents, America's authoritarian "friends" — including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the U.A.E. — have also been orchestrating illicit influence operations in the U.S. But, unlike Russia and China, they’ve faced little punishment for meddling in America.

On Wednesday, former Fugees rapper, Prakazrel “Pras” Michel, was convicted of orchestrating an elaborate influence operation on behalf of Malaysian financier Jho Low and attempting to extradite a Chinese government critic. 

On April 17, 40 Chinese officials were charged with running a transnational repression scheme targeting Chinese dissidents in the U.S. and two Chinese operatives were arrested for allegedly acting as agents of the Chinese government and running a secret police station in New York City — just one of more than a hundred secret police stations the Chinese government allegedly operates in foreign countries. The very next day, on April 18, Russia was in the Justice Department’s crosshairs when four U.S. citizens and three Russian intelligence officers were accused of conducting an illicit foreign influence operation in the United States since 2015 that sought to “divide Americans and interfere in elections in the United States.”

The allegations in these indictments are deeply troubling and, unfortunately, are just the latest installments in ongoing campaigns by the Russian and Chinese governments to interfere in U.S. politics and elections. While the illicit influence campaigns of America’s adversaries have, rightly, drawn the ire of Congress, America’s “friends” — including authoritarian governments in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE — have repeatedly been caught engaging in similar acts yet, unlike America’s adversaries, they’re meddling in America with near impunity. In some cases, former members of Congress and high ranking members of the military are even working for them.

On Wednesday the Senate held a hearing on the revolving door from the Department of Defense to defense contractors and foreign governments. In anticipation of the hearing, Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) released data on DoD’s granting of waivers for former high-ranking U.S. military personnel seeking work with foreign governments.

As Responsible Statecraft reported, more than half of all these waivers were for work with just one country — the United Arab Emirates. While the Pentagon was granting these high-ranking officials — which included eight former generals and Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis  — approval to work with the UAE, the Emiratis were hard at work repeatedly meddling in American politics and elections. 

In fact, UAE meddling in America has risen to the level of a national security challenge. Last fall, members of Congress were briefed on a report compiled by the National Intelligence Council that documented the UAE’s myriad efforts to meddle in U.S. politics and steer U.S. foreign policy in its favor. All while DoD was unflinchingly sending the UAE our top military minds and former members of Congress, like Ileane Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), Lamar Smith (R-Tex), and Congressional staff were becoming lobbyists in the UAE’s massive legal influence operation

Not to be outdone by their friends in the UAE, the governments of Saudi Arabia and Egypt have also been meddling in America, and going to extraordinary lengths to suppress dissidents on U.S. soil. On April 17, the same day the mainstream media was laser focused on revelations of Chinese influence in America, the non-profit Freedom Initiative released a report documenting appalling Saudi and Egyptian transnational repression efforts in the U.S., “including threats of physical harm, surveilling activists and communities, hacking into phones of dissidents, and online harassment,” as well as dissidents' family members being taken hostage in Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

This follows repeated attempts by the Saudi government to interfere in U.S. elections, hiring agents at Twitter to spy on dissidents, and the Saudi embassy’s complicity in helping Saudi citizens accused of crimes in the U.S. — including murder, rape, and possession of child pornography — flee the country.

Like the UAE, Saudi Arabia has also been offering huge paychecks to former top defense officials and members of Congress willing to do the Kingdom’s bidding. Last week the Washington Post reported that retired General Keith Alexander, who also previously led the National Security Agency, received a $700,000 contract to advise Saudi Arabia on cybersecurity. 

DoD records released to Sens. Warren and Grassley, reveal that Alexander was just one of eleven former U.S. military generals that were approved to work for Saudi Arabia. Former members of Congress and their staff have also been a key part of Saudi Arabia’s legal influence operations. Most notably, former Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.) has been a registered Saudi lobbyist since 2014 and is one of the top fundraisers in the Republican Party, as my colleague Eli Clifton chronicled in Responsible Statecraft.

All told, the tools different foreign governments use to meddle in America are similar, but the U.S. responses to them are not. While Chinese provocations have helped to push the U.S. towards a war-footing with China, UAE, Saudi, and Egyptian misdeeds have been rewarded with weapons of war. In fact, they’re some of the very top recipients of U.S. foreign military sales.

This unwillingness to hold America's supposed "friends" accountable for illegal meddling leaves the U.S. vulnerable to influence attacks from all authoritarian actors, whether friend or foe. To truly defend democracy in the U.S. we must punish any malign foreign actor that seeks to meddle in America.


Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman fist bumps U.S. President Joe Biden upon his arrival at Al Salman Palace, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, July 15, 2022. Bandar Algaloud/Courtesy of Saudi Royal Court/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS PICTURE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY
google cta
Analysis | Reporting | Washington Politics
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
Alternative vs. legacy media
Top photo credit: Gemini AI

Ding dong the legacy media and its slavish war reporting is dead

Media

In a major development that must be frustrating to an establishment trying to sell their policies to an increasingly skeptical public, the rising popularity of independent media has made it impossible to create broad consensus for corporate-compliant narratives, and to casually denigrate, or even censor, those who disagree.

It’s been a long road.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.