Follow us on social

Screenshot-2023-04-27-at-5.09.34-pm

Gaetz effort to withdraw US troops from Somalia fails

Effort by House Republican to shift longstanding counterterrorism policy was thwarted despite assistance from progressives like Rep. Ilhan Omar.

Analysis | Africa

An effort to end military operations and to bring any US special forces home from Somalia has failed in a 102-321 today on the House floor.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) introduced the concurrent resolution pursuant to the War Powers Resolution that would require the president to withdraw all troops (with the exception of those securing the U.S. embassy) within a year of passage. He argued that U.S. troops in that country — there on and off for the last 30 years — are no longer necessary.

His bill received bipartisan support — 52 Republicans, 50 Democrats — but it was ultimately not enough.

“The United States has had a military presence in Somalia since 1992, but it's been a costly and mostly fruitless endeavor. Somalia is entrenched in violence and political instability that has persisted for decades, and there seems to be no end in sight," he said in a statement issued after the vote.

"America has a responsibility to protect its citizens and defend its interests, but Somalia is not a vital national security concern. Instead of pouring more resources into a never-ending conflict, our country should prioritize its own needs and focus on issues that directly impact our neighbors," according to the statement. "It is time to bring our troops home and let Somalia find its own path to stability.”

Biden authorized a return of some 500 U.S. forces to Somalia last year after his predecessor, Donald Trump, ordered 700 of them out during his term. Biden insists they are needed to combat the radical Islamist al-Shabaab group. 

Gaetz’s bill drew votes from members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, including Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who is Somali-American, and the CPC's chairwoman, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, (D-Wash.) Omar spoke in favor of the measure on the floor. She said a “real debate” on U.S. policy in Somalia and Africa in general, is “long overdue.”

“It is important we support the question before us,” she said, noting that the 365-day period of withdrawal was “responsible.”

“I, and many Somali Americans support this resolution and I urge my colleagues to do the same,” she added.

Somalia has been besieged by militant violence, political corruption and instability for more than three decades. U.S. military and CIA involvement has been extensive, but experts say such outside assistance and involvement has not helped. In fact, many believe it has made things worse.

The vote coincides with the publication today of a report on U.S. counterterrorism programs in Somalia by the Costs of War project at Brown University's Watson Institute.

The report found that the United States has spent more than $2.5 billion on counterterrorism assistance in Somalia since 2007, an amount which the project called "just the tip of the iceberg" because that figure doesn't include spending on U.S. military and intelligence operations in Somalia that have yet to be disclosed by the relevant agencies. 

Remarkably, the study also found that Washington spends more on counterterrorism in Somalia each year "than the Federal Somali Government earns in tax revenue, flooding Somalia with funding for militarized counterterrorism and thereby diverting resources away from real conflict resolution solutions."

The results, however, have been disappointing, to say the least. "Sixteen years after Al-Shabaab's emergence," it concluded, "the group is still on the rise."

"U.S. efforts are not merely exacerbating Somalia's insecurity, but actively impeding stability and conflict resolution," it went on. "The U.S. portrays itself as an external actor with a supportive role in helping Somalia in conflict resolution efforts. But U.S. policy makes conflict inevitable."

This was not Gaetz’s first attempt to get U.S. troops out of an active conflict zone. The House voted last month on his resolution to withdraw the approximately 900 troops who remain in Syria. That vote failed by similar numbers, 103  to 321, with Democrats and Republicans also breaking in largely the same way as today's vote.

Reps. Ilhan Omar and Matt Gaetz (Twitter)
Analysis | Africa
Why American war and election news coverage is so rotten
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. | Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. speaking wit… | Flickr

Why American war and election news coverage is so rotten

Media


Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.”

keep readingShow less
Peter Thiel: 'I defer to Israel'

Peter Thiel attends the annual Allen and Co. Sun Valley Media Conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, U.S., July 6, 2022. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Peter Thiel: 'I defer to Israel'

QiOSK

The trouble with doing business with Israel — or any foreign government — is you can't really say anything when they do terrible things with technology that you may or may not have sold to them, or hope to sell to them, or hope to sell in your own country.

Such was the case with Peter Thiel, co-founder of Palantir Technologies, in this recently surfaced video, talking to the Cambridge Union back in May. See him stumble and stutter and buy time when asked what he thought about the use of Artificial Intelligence by the Israeli military in a targeting program called "Lavender" — which we now know has been responsible for the deaths of an untold number of innocent Palestinians since Oct 7. (See investigation here).

keep readingShow less
Are budget boosters actually breaking the military?

Committee chairman Jack Reed (D-RI), left, looks on as co-chair Roger Wicker (R-MS) shakes hands with U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin before a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on President Biden's proposed budget request for the Department of Defense on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., April 9, 2024. REUTERS/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades

Are budget boosters actually breaking the military?

Military Industrial Complex

Now that both political parties have seemingly settled upon their respective candidates for the 2024 presidential election, we have an opportune moment to ask a rather fundamental question about our nation’s defense spending: how much is enough?

Back in May, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, penned an op-ed in the New York Times insisting the answer was not enough at all. Wicker claimed that the nation wasn’t prepared for war — or peace, for that matter — that our ships and fighter-jet fleets were “dangerously small” and our military infrastructure “outdated.” So weak our defense establishment and so dangerous the world right now, Wicker pressed, the nation ought to “spend an additional $55 billion on the military in the 2025 fiscal year.”

keep readingShow less

Israel-Gaza Crisis

Latest

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.