Follow us on social

Can France take on China by itself?

Can France take on China by itself?

Emmanuel Macron's recent visit to Washington highlights the French president's desire to take a more assertive role in the Indo-Pacific.

Analysis | Asia-Pacific

Like the United States, France has stressed the need to counter China’s militarization in the South and East China Seas and more widely Beijing’s influence in the Indo-Pacific. 

President Emmanuel Macron’s first meeting with President Joe Biden this week saw the French premiere pledging to uphold the “unwavering” U.S.-French alliance. This included the two presidents reportedly pledging to continue coordination “regarding China’s challenge to the rules-based international order,” suggesting they will shelve past differences amid mutual concern over Beijing’s rise.

This came on the heels of November’s G20 summit in Bali, where Macron expressed Paris’s aspirations to relaunch its strategy in the region. 

But there are differences in the way Washington and Paris want to handle things, as the latter has sought to empower the European Union to counterbalance the apparent regional dominance between China and the United States.

French interests in the region

Referring to the Indo-Pacific during an election rally in April 2022, Macron said: "Who better than Europe to interfere with the duopoly that is being established between the United States and China? The aim of France is not to submit to the great divisions that paralyze, but to know how to exchange with each region, each power, and continue to build new alliances." 

Indeed, the region is important for France, as it currently has seven overseas territories including Mayotte, La Réunion, New Caledonia, and French Polynesia. Around 1.5 million French people live in these territories, which occupy a vast maritime space from the Indian Ocean to French Polynesia in the Pacific. Paris has expanded its clout there, with nearly 8,000 troops stationed in the territories, along with several vessels and aircraft including patrol vessels, maritime surveillance aircraft, tactical transport aircraft, and helicopters. French strategy also aims to legitimize and give credibility to France’s status as a “resident power” in the Indo-Pacific. 

France has also focused on development within its overseas territories and the region’s countries, while also investing in science and research and implementing cultural and language education through organizations like the Instituts Francais (French Institute) and AEFE (Agency for French Education Abroad). And along with its strategy aiming to expand its economic, military, and diplomatic stake in the Indo-Pacific, France also wants to facilitate a free and open Asia-Pacific in order to implement green regional economic governance.

France’s role as a permanent member of the Security Council also requires it to place a high priority on regional stability like freedom of navigation and trade.

Rallying against China

While seeking to deepen its soft power, Paris has also echoed Washington’s warnings about China’s role there. Yet divergences with the United States have seemingly undermined France’s ambitions in the region. Last year, French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian called the trilateral security alliance AUKUS between Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom a “stab in the back.” Not only did Australia renege on a 2016 deal to acquire French submarines, but the deal aimed at countering China also dwarfed France’s aims to act as a security guarantor in the region.

As a result, along with leveraging its overseas territories, France has also sought cooperation with regional powers who also oppose China’s rise. It has stepped up collaboration with India to grant access to each other's military facilities, while both have agreed to conduct maritime security operations and annual joint naval drills. This cooperation has been enhanced by India’s ​​purchase of 36 French Rafale fighter jets. Paris has also sought cooperation agreements with Tokyo. In January, both governments struck agreements to increase naval patrols, with both France and Japan reiterating concerns over China’s expanding presence in the East and South China Seas.

France has also expressed its desire for “increased European Union involvement in the region, as an actor for sustainable development and stability.” And gaining the EU’s support would also be necessary for its ambitions in the Indo-Pacific. Indeed, leveraging the EU has been beneficial for France, as it has traditionally perceived “more Europe” as meaning “more France.”

Although the EU was traditionally largely divided on how to approach China and the Indo-Pacific the bloc’s regional policy has rapidly evolved. No longer seeing it as purely a negotiating partner, the EU recognized China as an “economic competitor” and a “systemic rival” in its 2019 strategy towards Beijing.

On the Indo-Pacific more generally, France has inspired other countries to follow its lead, as Germany and the Netherlands later adopted their own strategies and have largely succeeded in getting the bloc on board, including member states like Italy, Sweden, Portugal, Croatia, and the Czech Republic. The EU published its Indo-Pacific strategy in September 2021, which was largely defined by the need for regional cooperation due to the “interdependence of the economies and the common global challenges.” A key aim for Brussels would be to “strengthen its strategic reach and its supply chains.”

An autonomous EU

The EU’s multifaceted partnership with the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) states, which was upgraded to strategic in 2020, shows the bloc has aimed to deepen its bilateral relations. The EU has aimed at closer ties with Japan, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Vietnam, as well as India, Australia, Indonesia, and New Zealand. Yet since the EU’s engagement is relatively new, and beyond cooperation like the Japanese-EU digital partnership in May 2022, Brussels’ involvement in the region is still a work in progress.

Yet unlike France and the United States, the EU has aimed to prioritize cooperation, including with China. According to Brussels’ Indo-Pacific strategy, the only instance in which contentions may occur is “where fundamental disagreements exist, such as on human rights.” Moreover, the bloc’s member states have still been divided on how to approach China. For instance, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s visit to Beijing in October largely aimed to increase bilateral trade relations, given the German leader previously forcibly approved Chinese shipping giant Cosco’s investment in the port of Hamburg and arrived in Beijing with delegates from large German companies such as Volkswagen, Siemens, and BASF. 

Moreover, it has at times proven necessary for France and the EU to cooperate with Washington in the region. The EU, United States, and Japan agreed to renew their Trilateral trade partnership in November 2021 and this was pushed further on September 15, 2022 when ministers agreed to upgrade cooperation on matters such as trade standards and countering forced labor.

As shown by its strategy towards China, and with member states like Germany attempting to prioritize economic cooperation with Beijing, the EU is less willing than the United States to outmanoeuvre Beijing in the Indo-Pacific. Thus, the EU is likely to play a complementary and even balanced role against China alongside the United States. 

Although a leader in Brussels’ engagement with the Indo-Pacific, Paris may struggle to rally a unified EU completely in its favor, and Macron’s meeting with Biden this week indicates he may aim to rely on U.S. ties rather than trying to counter America’s regional presence. Macron may instead aim to balance between Washington and Brussels, appealing to the former’s tough stance on China while also having to concede to the EU’s more pragmatic position. 


The French president Emmanuel Macron welcoming Chinese President Xi Jinping during his state visit in France at the Elysee Palace in 2018 (Frederic Legrand/Shutterstock)|
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
free speech
Top photo credit: Cans Creative/Shutterstock

Criticizing Israel? This definition of antisemitism will take care of that.

Middle East

In 2016, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) published what the organization called their “working definition” of antisemitism.

According to its lead writer, “It was created primarily so that European data collectors (of antisemitic incidents) could know what to include and exclude. That way antisemitism could be monitored better over time and across borders.”

keep readingShow less
Russian President Vladimir Putin
Top photo credit: Russian President Vladimir Putin Alexandros Michailidis/Shutterstock

Trouble in Russian economy means Putin really needs Alaska talks too

Europe

Russia’s economy is at a critical juncture. It is not an understatement to say that Moscow needs these Alaska peace talks with the Trump administration on Friday to end the Ukraine war as much as Kyiv does.

Mixed indicators in June signal that the overall economy seems relatively stable for the near term, but recession may be on the horizon. It may be trying to hide it, but Moscow can no longer obscure the true costs of the war, which are in part to blame for current conditions.

keep readingShow less
Nairobi protests Kenya
Top photo credit: Pro-government counter-protesters and riot police officers disperse people protesting over the death of Kenyan blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody, in downtown Nairobi, Kenya June 17, 2025. REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya

Why is Washington's relationship with Kenya suddenly in tatters?

Africa

For a fleeting moment last year, Nairobi was Washington’s darling. In a rarity for an African leader, President William Ruto was honored at the White House, and Kenya was designated a Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA), the first in sub-Saharan Africa.

It was the capstone of a transactional bargain: Kenya would serve as America’s anchor state in a turbulent region, providing peacekeepers for Haiti and a stable partner against a backdrop of coups and Chinese and Russian encroachment in Africa. In return, Nairobi would receive security assistance, and a powerful friend in Washington.

Just over a year later, that bargain lies in tatters. The first invoice for its failure has arrived in the form of an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) submitted recently by Sen. James Risch, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,calling for a formal review of Kenya’s prized MNNA status.

The rationale, according to the amendment, is a devastating catalogue of Nairobi's recent transgressions: its dubious ties with "nonstate armed groups and violent extremist organizations, including the Rapid Support Forces and al-Shabaab," its role as a "financial safe haven" for sanctioned entities, its deepening security and economic entanglement with China, and its use of "United States security assistance" for "abductions, torture, renditions, and violence against civilians."

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.