Follow us on social

google cta
Diplomacy Watch: Non-aligned countries flex their muscles

Diplomacy Watch: Non-aligned countries flex their muscles

Russia and the West talk sports and diplomatic etiquette as the Global South steps up to the plate at the G20.

Europe
google cta
google cta

After a visit to Russia and Ukraine last week, Indonesian President Joko Widodo returned home to host the G20 foreign ministers meeting, which will bring many of the Ukraine war’s biggest stakeholders into the same room for the first time since the war began in February.

Expectations are low going into the event. In the Washington Post, a “senior State Department official” signaled the Biden administration’s discontent over Widodo’s decision to invite Russia, and many predict that talks, held yesterday and today, will feature more chest-thumping than substantive discussions. But the presence of neutral countries like India, Brazil, China, and Indonesia reminds observers of one thing: The United States and its Western allies are not the only countries who will decide how this conflict ends.

With that in mind, welcome to this week’s edition of Diplomacy Watch, your weekly round-up of diplomatic efforts aimed at ending Russia’s war in Ukraine (or at least pushing things in that direction).

— Widodo’s back-to-back visits to Kyiv and Moscow showed the world that there is “a role for states outside the wealthy world in helping to resolve a crisis that has punished emerging markets,” according to columnist Clara Ferreira Marques of Bloomberg. Widodo left with two small victories, earning a promise from Russia to open a Black Sea shipping route for Ukrainian grain and persuading Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky to attend the G20 summit in November, which could create an opportunity for talks (or at least time in the same room) with Russian officials.

— Secretary of State Antony Blinken will sit down with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi at the G20 meeting, according to Al Jazeera. The pair is expected to discuss Russia’s war in Ukraine, which China has neither condemned nor endorsed. 

— A new documentary shows a phone call between French President Emmanuel Macron and Russian President Vladimir Putin just days before Russia invaded Ukraine. According to Politico, Macron appeared confident that he had forestalled the attack and persuaded Putin to meet with President Joe Biden. The footage drew a sharp rebuke from Lavrov, who said Wednesday that “diplomatic etiquette does not provide for one-sided leaks of [such] recordings.”

— A group of Western sports officials issued a statement Tuesday in which they reaffirmed their previous commitments to limit Russian and Belarusian participation in international sporting events. The officials also called on sport organizations to “consider suspending the broadcasting of sports competitions into Russia and Belarus.”

— In other sports-related news, NBC News reported that Russia may try to trade basketball star Britney Griner for Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout, who is serving a 25-year sentence after falling for an elaborate sting operation in which he agreed to sell arms to “Colombian rebels” who were really American agents. Griner, who the United States considers a hostage, pleaded guilty to charges of possession of cannabis oil yesterday in a Russian court, which could land her in prison for up to 10 years. Bout’s lawyer and Russian media have confirmed the talks, but U.S. officials have yet to comment on the issue.

U.S. State Department news:

Spokesperson Ned Price defended Blinken’s decision to attend the G20 meeting despite Lavrov’s presence. “The G20 is [...] an important forum to discuss many of the issues that are at the forefront today, many of the issues that are at the forefront precisely because of Russia’s brutal war against Ukraine,” Price said on Tuesday in a press briefing. “We believe we can fulfill those twin imperatives, seeing the success of this G20 summit without offering any semblance of business as usual with Russia.” Notably, Price added that he would “certainly not expect any meeting between Secretary Blinken and Foreign Minister Lavrov.”


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

google cta
Europe
Does Israel really still need a 'qualitative military edge' ?
An Israeli Air Force F-35I Lightning II “Adir” approaches a U.S. Air Force 908th Expeditionary Refueling Squadron KC-10 Extender to refuel during “Enduring Lightning II” exercise over southern Israel Aug. 2, 2020. While forging a resolute partnership, the allies train to maintain a ready posture to deter against regional aggressors. (U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Patrick OReilly)

Does Israel really still need a 'qualitative military edge' ?

Middle East

On November 17, 2025, President Donald Trump announced that he would approve the sale to Saudi Arabia of the most advanced US manned strike fighter aircraft, the F-35. The news came one day before the visit to the White House of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has sought to purchase 48 such aircraft in a multibillion-dollar deal that has the potential to shift the military status quo in the Middle East. Currently, Israel is the only other state in the region to possess the F-35.

During the White House meeting, Trump suggested that Saudi Arabia’s F-35s should be equipped with the same technology as those procured by Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly sought assurances from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who sought to walk back Trump’s comment and reiterated a “commitment that the United States will continue to preserve Israel’s qualitative military edge in everything related to supplying weapons and military systems to countries in the Middle East.”

keep readingShow less
Think a $35B gas deal will thaw Egypt toward Israel? Not so fast.
Top image credit: Miss.Cabul via shutterstock.com

Think a $35B gas deal will thaw Egypt toward Israel? Not so fast.

Middle East

The Trump administration’s hopes of convening a summit between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi either in Cairo or Washington as early as the end of this month or early next are unlikely to materialize.

The centerpiece of the proposed summit is the lucrative expansion of natural gas exports worth an estimated $35 billion. This mega-deal will pump an additional 4 billion cubic meters annually into Egypt through 2040.

keep readingShow less
Trump
Top image credit: President Donald Trump addresses the nation, Wednesday, December 17, 2025, from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump national security logic: rare earths and fossil fuels

Washington Politics

The new National Security Strategy of the United States seeks “strategic stability” with Russia. It declares that China is merely a competitor, that the Middle East is not central to American security, that Latin America is “our hemisphere,” and that Europe faces “civilizational erasure.”

India, the world's largest country by population, barely rates a mention — one might say, as Neville Chamberlain did of Czechoslovakia in 1938, it’s “a faraway country... of which we know nothing.” Well, so much the better for India, which can take care of itself.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.