Follow us on social

Diplomacy Watch: Non-aligned countries flex their muscles

Diplomacy Watch: Non-aligned countries flex their muscles

Russia and the West talk sports and diplomatic etiquette as the Global South steps up to the plate at the G20.

Europe

After a visit to Russia and Ukraine last week, Indonesian President Joko Widodo returned home to host the G20 foreign ministers meeting, which will bring many of the Ukraine war’s biggest stakeholders into the same room for the first time since the war began in February.

Expectations are low going into the event. In the Washington Post, a “senior State Department official” signaled the Biden administration’s discontent over Widodo’s decision to invite Russia, and many predict that talks, held yesterday and today, will feature more chest-thumping than substantive discussions. But the presence of neutral countries like India, Brazil, China, and Indonesia reminds observers of one thing: The United States and its Western allies are not the only countries who will decide how this conflict ends.

With that in mind, welcome to this week’s edition of Diplomacy Watch, your weekly round-up of diplomatic efforts aimed at ending Russia’s war in Ukraine (or at least pushing things in that direction).

— Widodo’s back-to-back visits to Kyiv and Moscow showed the world that there is “a role for states outside the wealthy world in helping to resolve a crisis that has punished emerging markets,” according to columnist Clara Ferreira Marques of Bloomberg. Widodo left with two small victories, earning a promise from Russia to open a Black Sea shipping route for Ukrainian grain and persuading Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky to attend the G20 summit in November, which could create an opportunity for talks (or at least time in the same room) with Russian officials.

— Secretary of State Antony Blinken will sit down with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi at the G20 meeting, according to Al Jazeera. The pair is expected to discuss Russia’s war in Ukraine, which China has neither condemned nor endorsed. 

— A new documentary shows a phone call between French President Emmanuel Macron and Russian President Vladimir Putin just days before Russia invaded Ukraine. According to Politico, Macron appeared confident that he had forestalled the attack and persuaded Putin to meet with President Joe Biden. The footage drew a sharp rebuke from Lavrov, who said Wednesday that “diplomatic etiquette does not provide for one-sided leaks of [such] recordings.”

— A group of Western sports officials issued a statement Tuesday in which they reaffirmed their previous commitments to limit Russian and Belarusian participation in international sporting events. The officials also called on sport organizations to “consider suspending the broadcasting of sports competitions into Russia and Belarus.”

— In other sports-related news, NBC Newsreported that Russia may try to trade basketball star Britney Griner for Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout, who is serving a 25-year sentence after falling for an elaborate sting operation in which he agreed to sell arms to “Colombian rebels” who were really American agents. Griner, who the United States considers a hostage, pleaded guilty to charges of possession of cannabis oil yesterday in a Russian court, which could land her in prison for up to 10 years. Bout’s lawyer and Russian media have confirmed the talks, but U.S. officials have yet to comment on the issue.

U.S. State Department news:

Spokesperson Ned Price defended Blinken’s decision to attend the G20 meeting despite Lavrov’s presence. “The G20 is [...] an important forum to discuss many of the issues that are at the forefront today, many of the issues that are at the forefront precisely because of Russia’s brutal war against Ukraine,” Price said on Tuesday in a press briefing. “We believe we can fulfill those twin imperatives, seeing the success of this G20 summit without offering any semblance of business as usual with Russia.” Notably, Price added that he would “certainly not expect any meeting between Secretary Blinken and Foreign Minister Lavrov.”


Europe
Iran nuclear
Top image credit: Inspired by maps via shutterstock.com

How the US could use Iran's uranium enrichment to its own advantage

Middle East

Since mid-April, Iran and the United States held numerous rounds of nuclear negotiations that have made measured progress — until Washington abruptly stated that Iran had no right to enrich uranium. Moreover, 200 members of the U.S. Congress sent president Trump a letter opposing any deal that would allow Iran to retain uranium enrichment capability.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei called U.S. demands “excessive and outrageous” and “nonsense.” Since the beginning of the Iranian nuclear crisis in 2003, Tehran has drawn a clear red line: the peaceful right to enrich uranium under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is non-negotiable.

keep readingShow less
american military missiles
Top photo credit: Fogcatcher/Shutterstock

5 ways the military industrial complex is a killer

Latest 3

Congress is on track to finish work on the fiscal year 2025 Pentagon budget this week, and odds are that it will add $150 billion to its funding for the next few years beyond what the department even asked for. Meanwhile, President Trump has announced a goal of over $1 trillion for the Pentagon for fiscal year 2026.

With these immense sums flying out the door, it’s a good time to take a critical look at the Pentagon budget, from the rationales given to justify near record levels of spending to the impact of that spending in the real world. Here are five things you should know about the Pentagon budget and the military-industrial complex that keeps the churn going.

keep readingShow less
Sudan
Top image credit: A Sudanese army soldier stands next to a destroyed combat vehicle as Sudan's army retakes ground and some displaced residents return to ravaged capital in the state of Khartoum Sudan March 26, 2025. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig

Will Sudan attack the UAE?

Africa

Recent weeks events have dramatically cast the Sudanese civil war back into the international spotlight, drawing renewed scrutiny to the role of external actors, particularly the United Arab Emirates.

This shift has been driven by Sudan's accusations at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against the UAE concerning violations of the Genocide Convention, alongside drone strikes on Port Sudan that Khartoum vociferously attributes to direct Emirati participation. Concurrently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly reaffirmed the UAE's deep entanglement in the conflict at a Senate hearing last week.

From Washington, another significant and sudden development also surfaced last week: the imposition of U.S. sanctions on the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) for alleged chemical weapons use. This dramatic accusation was met by an immediate denial from Sudan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which vehemently dismissed the claims as "unfounded" and criticized the U.S. for bypassing the proper international mechanisms, specifically the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, despite Sudan's active membership on its Executive Council.

Despite the gravity of such an accusation, corroboration for the use of chemical agents in Sudan’s war remains conspicuously absent from public debate or reporting, save for a January 2025 New York Times article citing unnamed U.S. officials. That report itself contained a curious disclaimer: "Officials briefed on the intelligence said the information did not come from the United Arab Emirates, an American ally that is also a staunch supporter of the R.S.F."

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.