Follow us on social

Us-capitol-scaled

Bipartisan 'Fighting Foreign Influence Act' targets think tank funding

Today's move follows incidents of high profile corruption and influence peddling involving well-connected Americans.

Analysis | North America

Just four days after the resignation of Brookings president John Allen, following the disclosure of a federal investigation into whether he secretly lobbied for Qatar, new legislation has been introduced in the House of Representatives addressing the dangers of foreign influences seeking to corrupt U.S. elections, government officials, and think tanks.

The legislation, “Fighting Foreign Influence Act,” sponsored by Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME), would require tax exempt organizations, including think tanks, to disclose large contributions from foreign governments or foreign political parties, impose a lifetime ban on former U.S. military officers, presidents, vice presidents, senior executive branch officials, and members of Congress from lobbying for foreign principals, and require political campaigns to verify that online donations can be tied to a valid U.S. address.

“Non-profit organizations and partisan think tanks play an outsized role in shaping public opinion and influencing policy decisions in the United States,” said Rep. Lance Gooden (R-TX), in a press release. “We must understand where these groups get their funding, who influences their agenda, and if adversarial nations are using non-profit groups to undermine the United States. The Fighting Foreign Influence Act would ensure there is finally transparency and accountability in the non-profit sector.”

“Americans distrust government no matter which party is in power,” said Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.), who cosponsored the bill. “By cracking down on foreign gifts, donations, and lobbying, we can begin the hard work of earning back the people’s trust. I am proud to join Democrats and Republicans to help introduce the Fighting Foreign Influence Act.”

“Current disclosure requirements for online donations make it easy for bad actors to violate federal contribution limits, or worse, for foreign money to influence U.S. elections. As technology advances, we must continue to stay ahead of the curve in thwarting those who wish to inappropriately influence our political processes,” said Congressman Paul Gosar (R-Wyo.). “Full disclosure of online contributions will ensure that the American people know the sources of campaign money and will greatly assist with maintaining a system of free and fair elections.”

The bipartisan effort to push foreign influence and funding out of the U.S. political process occurs alongside a heightened Justice Department interest in enforcing the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA), a statute requiring agents of foreign principals to register with the Justice Department and regulate activities undertaken at the behest of their foreign clients.

Last week, a leaked search warrant revealed an FBI investigation into Brookings president John Allen, alleging he secretly lobbied for Qatar, a country which had also contributed over $30 million to Brookings over 14 years. Qatar was Brookings’ largest foreign government funder until the relationship ended last year. Allen denies the allegations and Brookings is not known to be under investigation.

And last month, the Justice Department sued billionaire real estate developer and Republican mega donor Steve Wynn to compel him to register as an agent of China under FARA. The government claims Wynn used his relationship with President Donald Trump to advance Chinese government interests. The Justice Department alleged that Wynn was operating casinos in the Chinese Special Administrative Region of Macau and sought to protect his business interests. Wynn has denied acting as an agent of the Chinese government.

The new bill’s sponsors cited a 2020 study by Ben Freeman, then-director of the Center for International Policy’s Foreign Influence Transparency Initiative, that revealed how at least $174 million flowed from foreign governments to U.S. think tanks between 2014 and 2018.

Freeman, who is now a research fellow at the Quincy Institute, and I authored a paper last year, “Restoring Trust in the Think Tank Sector,” laying out tangible steps that think tanks should adopt in order to earn back public trust. Steps included: disclosing sources of funding; complying with FARA, and proactively disclosing potential conflicts of interest between sources of funding and research products.


(shutterstock/trekandshoot)
Analysis | North America
Warfare movie A24
Top photo credit: (official trailer for Warfare/A24)
'Warfare': Rare Iraq film that doesn't preach but packs truth

'Warfare': Rare Iraq War film that doesn't preach but packs punch

Media

Unlike Alex Garland’s Civil War, his Warfare, co-directed with war vet Ray Mendoza, is not just another attempt at a realistic portrayal of war, in all its blood and gore. Warfare, based on a true story, is really a parable about the overweening ambition and crushing failure of empire, a microcosm of America’s disastrous adventure in Iraq.

A Navy Seal mission reconnoiters a neighborhood in Ramadi. “I like this house,” says the team commander, reflecting the overconfidence of the empire at its unipolar moment. But it soon becomes clear that the mission has underestimated the enemy, that the whole neighborhood has, in fact, been tracking the Seals’ movements. Surprised and scared, the mission requests to be extricated. But extrication becomes a bloody, hellish experience despite the Seals’ technological edge in weapons, IT, and logistics, and it barely succeeds.

keep readingShow less
vietnam war memorial washington DC
Top photo credit: Washington, DC, May 24, 2024: A visitor reads the names of the fallen soldiers at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial at the National Mall ahead of Memorial Day. (A_Kiphayet/Shutterstock)

Veterans: What we would say to Trump on this Memorial Day

Military Industrial Complex

This Memorial Day comes a month after the 50th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon, which was largely used to recall the collapse of the entire American project in Vietnam. In short, the failure of the war is now viewed as both a rebuke of the American Exceptionalism myth and the rigid Cold War mentality that had Washington in a vice grip for much of the 20th Century.

“The leaders who mismanaged this debacle were never held accountable and remained leading players in the establishment for the rest of their lives,” noted author and professor Stephen Walt in a RS symposium on the war. “The country learned little from this bitter experience, and repeated these same errors in Iraq, Afghanistan, and several other places.”

keep readingShow less
Ukraine war
Top image credit: HC FOTOSTUDIO via shutterstock.com

Should a Russia-Ukraine peace leave territorial control for later?

Europe

Since the beginning of President Donald Trump’s second term, there have been ongoing diplomatic efforts to broker a peace settlement in the three-year-long war between Russia and Ukraine. So far, however, negotiations have failed to bridge the stark divide between the two sides.

Two of the key contentious issues have been post-war security guarantees for Ukraine and the political status of Ukrainian territory claimed or annexed by Russia. Specifically, regarding territorial sovereignty, Ukraine and Russia have rejected the United States' proposal to “freeze” the war along the current line of conflict as a de facto new border. Ukraine has refused to renounce its claims of sovereignty over territories occupied by Russia (including Crimea, which was annexed in 2014). Russia, in turn, has demanded Ukraine’s recognition of Russia’s territorial claim over the entirety of the four Ukrainian regions, which Russia annexed in 2022.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.