Follow us on social

Us-capitol-scaled

Bipartisan 'Fighting Foreign Influence Act' targets think tank funding

Today's move follows incidents of high profile corruption and influence peddling involving well-connected Americans.

Analysis | North America

Just four days after the resignation of Brookings president John Allen, following the disclosure of a federal investigation into whether he secretly lobbied for Qatar, new legislation has been introduced in the House of Representatives addressing the dangers of foreign influences seeking to corrupt U.S. elections, government officials, and think tanks.

The legislation, “Fighting Foreign Influence Act,” sponsored by Rep. Jared Golden (D-ME), would require tax exempt organizations, including think tanks, to disclose large contributions from foreign governments or foreign political parties, impose a lifetime ban on former U.S. military officers, presidents, vice presidents, senior executive branch officials, and members of Congress from lobbying for foreign principals, and require political campaigns to verify that online donations can be tied to a valid U.S. address.

“Non-profit organizations and partisan think tanks play an outsized role in shaping public opinion and influencing policy decisions in the United States,” said Rep. Lance Gooden (R-TX), in a press release. “We must understand where these groups get their funding, who influences their agenda, and if adversarial nations are using non-profit groups to undermine the United States. The Fighting Foreign Influence Act would ensure there is finally transparency and accountability in the non-profit sector.”

“Americans distrust government no matter which party is in power,” said Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.), who cosponsored the bill. “By cracking down on foreign gifts, donations, and lobbying, we can begin the hard work of earning back the people’s trust. I am proud to join Democrats and Republicans to help introduce the Fighting Foreign Influence Act.”

“Current disclosure requirements for online donations make it easy for bad actors to violate federal contribution limits, or worse, for foreign money to influence U.S. elections. As technology advances, we must continue to stay ahead of the curve in thwarting those who wish to inappropriately influence our political processes,” said Congressman Paul Gosar (R-Wyo.). “Full disclosure of online contributions will ensure that the American people know the sources of campaign money and will greatly assist with maintaining a system of free and fair elections.”

The bipartisan effort to push foreign influence and funding out of the U.S. political process occurs alongside a heightened Justice Department interest in enforcing the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA), a statute requiring agents of foreign principals to register with the Justice Department and regulate activities undertaken at the behest of their foreign clients.

Last week, a leaked search warrant revealed an FBI investigation into Brookings president John Allen, alleging he secretly lobbied for Qatar, a country which had also contributed over $30 million to Brookings over 14 years. Qatar was Brookings’ largest foreign government funder until the relationship ended last year. Allen denies the allegations and Brookings is not known to be under investigation.

And last month, the Justice Department sued billionaire real estate developer and Republican mega donor Steve Wynn to compel him to register as an agent of China under FARA. The government claims Wynn used his relationship with President Donald Trump to advance Chinese government interests. The Justice Department alleged that Wynn was operating casinos in the Chinese Special Administrative Region of Macau and sought to protect his business interests. Wynn has denied acting as an agent of the Chinese government.

The new bill’s sponsors cited a 2020 study by Ben Freeman, then-director of the Center for International Policy’s Foreign Influence Transparency Initiative, that revealed how at least $174 million flowed from foreign governments to U.S. think tanks between 2014 and 2018.

Freeman, who is now a research fellow at the Quincy Institute, and I authored a paper last year, “Restoring Trust in the Think Tank Sector,” laying out tangible steps that think tanks should adopt in order to earn back public trust. Steps included: disclosing sources of funding; complying with FARA, and proactively disclosing potential conflicts of interest between sources of funding and research products.


(shutterstock/trekandshoot)
Analysis | North America
general Michael Kurilla Israel
Top photo credit: General Michael “Erik” Kurilla, commander of U.S. Central Command, visited Israel in July 2022 to meet with Israeli Defense Force (IDF) leadership, to include the IDF Chief of Staff, Lt General Aviv Kohavi. (U.S. Central Command public affairs)

Is Israel's favorite US general helping to push us into war?

Middle East

Did the Israelis strike Iran when it did because Michael Kurilla is still commander of U.S. Central Command and a “window” for a prospective joint operation with the U.S. might be closing?

Some are speculating that because Kurilla is expected to retire from the military this summer that the Israelis saw their chance. The Army general, 59, has been widely reported to be on one side of a split in the Pentagon over whether the U.S. should support and even be part of Israeli strikes against Iran’s nuclear program.

keep readingShow less
Baqubah, Iraq
Top image credit: Baqubah, Iraq, March 30, 2007 (Stacy L. Pearsall USAF photo)

Welcome to Iraq War 2.0

Middle East

Like all things in the Middle East, the U.S.–Israeli war on Iran can seem complicated. It’s not. The unprovoked Israeli attack on Iran is the 2003 Iraq War 2.0, except it has the potential to be far, far more catastrophic than the absolute catastrophe that was Iraq.

Like President George W. Bush’s 2003 war on Iraq, the war on Iran is an unprovoked, illegal, offensive, unilateral war of aggression, potentially aimed at regime change, and sold to the public based on lies about nonexistent weapons of mass destruction.

keep readingShow less
Soldiers Mali Africa
Top photo credit: Soldiers in Ansongo, Mali (Fred Marie/Shutterstock)

Wagner mercenaries declare 'mission accomplished' in Mali

Africa

On June 6, a Wagner-affiliated Telegram channel announced the Russian private military company’s (PMC) withdrawal from Mali, declaring “mission accomplished.”

After continuing operations in Mali nearly two years after the deaths of its founders, Yevgeny Prigozhin and Dmitry Utkin, the Russian state has finally subsumed Wagner’s structures under the Russian Ministry of Defense-subordinate, Africa Corps.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.