Follow us on social

google cta
Kazakhstan: Dozens killed as government unleashes military crackdown

Kazakhstan: Dozens killed as government unleashes military crackdown

Thousands have been detained as Russia blames the unrest on an assortment of foreign actors.

Analysis | Reporting | Middle East
google cta
google cta

The government in Kazakhstan has deployed the military to end the public unrest that authorities say has claimed the lives of at least 18 law enforcement officers and dozens of protesters.

Officials in charge of administering the state of emergency imposed on the country’s commercial capital, Almaty, claimed on January 6 that two of the officers had been beheaded. Interior Ministry officials said 2,000 people have been detained in Almaty alone. 

The authorities have said those grisly developments are a full vindication of overnight remarks by President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, who pinned the turbulence on what he termed foreign-aided terrorist and criminal groups. 

“This is evidence of the terroristic and extremist nature of these bandit gangs,” security officials said in a statement released through state television.

Kazakh officials have refrained from publicly stating the suspected provenance of the alleged militants. 

What the government is terming an anti-terrorism operation, conducted under the banner “In the Name of Peace,” saw military forces fanning throughout Almaty on January 6 and engaging in running battles.  

The emergent official rhetoric marks a sharp departure from how the government was characterizing the initial wave of protests that began in the west of the country following a sudden spike in the price of car fuel at the start of the year. The initial reaction of officials with was to offer concessions by restoring subsidies for liquified petroleum gas, or LPG. 

But that attitude shifted when the focus of demonstrators broadened to encompass a more general criticism of the government. 

Rallies in cities like Aktau, Aktobe and Atyrau drew crowds numbering in the thousands – large turnouts for Kazakhstan, where unauthorized rallies are typically thwarted by police before they can begin.

The unusual show of nationwide dissent then turned into something darker and more violent on January 5. The circumstances of what occurred in Almaty on that day are not clear and may never be fully understood, since the government will likely be reluctant to backtrack on its terrorism plot claims. What began as a peaceful rally turned violent, seemingly after riot police sought to disperse the thousands of people in attendance.  

Almaty has since that time been ravaged by looting and exchanges of fire between government troops and unknown gunmen. The situation became so parlous that Tokayev was moved to plead for assistance from the Moscow-led Collective Security Treaty Organization. 

Members of the CSTO quickly approved a peacekeeping operation. Already on January 6, troops began arriving in Kazakhstan from Russia, Belarus, Tajikistan and Armenia. The largest contingent, numbering 3,000 troops, is coming from Russia. It is unclear how these troops will be deployed. Lawmakers in Kyrgyzstan, the other member of the alliance, have yet to give their definitive approval to deploying troops. 

Russia has willingly endorsed the evaluation of events in Kazakhstan as the work of unspecified outside parties.

“We consider these latest events in our ally nation a foreign-inspired attempt to use violence and trained, organized armed bands to undermine the security and territorial integrity of the state,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement

If Kazakh officials are being circumspect about whom exactly they blame for the violence in Almaty, Russian lawmakers have been bolder. Russian Senator Konstantin Kosachev, chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, said protesters in Kazakhstan included militants drawn from the ranks of armed gangs operating in “the Middle East, primarily in Afghanistan.” Ruslan Balbek, an MP in the State Duma, meanwhile, said he detected the involvement of the Islamic State group.

Public order updates from the Kazakh authorities have come to sound less like police bulletins and more like dispatches from the front line. Toward the evening of January 6, news agency KazTag cited unidentified sources as saying that groups of armed people had seized a television tower on a hill overlooking Almaty. Eyewitnesses reported hearing sustained gunfire on the central Republic Square. That is the square that saw some of the most intense scenes on January 5 as large mobs stormed the city hall and set fires that burned intensely for more than a day. State television cited officials as saying armed gangs had surrounded two hospitals in Almaty and were preventing arriving patients and medical personnel from entering.

Internet connections were once again down in Kazakhstan throughout January 6 and phone signals barely worked, making it all but impossible to verify government claims or to obtain fresh and reliable information. Almost all television stations were taken off the air. 

Some local media were able nevertheless to report on continued instances of unrest in Almaty.

Looting of shopping malls and supermarkets was ongoing throughout the night. The Union of Trading Centers has said it estimates the damage caused by marauders may reach 25 billion tenge ($57.5 million). Large supermarkets and banks have put down their shutters to prevent looters from gaining access, leaving residents with small grocery stores as the only means to buy food. Journalists have reported seeing long lines at those shops, as well as at gas stations. Mosques across the country will not be holding Friday prayers until the nationwide state of emergency declared by President Tokayev on January 5 has been lifted.

Sporadic and unverifiable reports have trickled in from cities all over Kazakhstan, a country the size of western Europe. News website Orda.kz said a few hundred people were still camped out in front of the regional administration building in the city of Aktobe, but that their numbers had diminished compared to recent days. Russian news agency RIA Novosti reported that around 500 people were occupying the main square in Atyrau, another city in the west. RFE/RL’s Kazakh service, Radio Azattyk, said crowds in Aktau were still rallying, now with demands for Tokayev to withdraw his invitation to the CSTO. 

In the capital, Nur-Sultan, the speaker of the Senate, Maulen Ashimbayev, appealed to the public to unite around Tokayev. 

“It is important for Kazakhstanis to unite around the president and to protect our independence and statehood. We must not succumb to provocations. Any criminal actions must be strictly suppressed,” Ashimbayev said in a statement disseminated by his office.

This article has been republished with permission from Eurasianet.


Troops are seen at the main square where hundreds of people were protesting against the government, after authorities' decision to lift price caps on liquefied petroleum gas, in Almaty, Kazakhstan January 6, 2022. REUTERS/Mariya Gordeyeva|Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, President of Kazakhstan and Russian President Vladimir Putin (Photos: Vladimir Tretyakov and Sasa Dzambic Photography via shutterstock.com)
google cta
Analysis | Reporting | Middle East
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports
Top image credit: A large oil tanker transits the Strait of Hormuz. (Shutterstock/ Clare Louise Jackson)

Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports

QiOSK

Hours after the U.S. and Israel launched a campaign of airstrikes across Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is warning vessels in the Persian Gulf via radio that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a report from Reuters.

The news suggests that Iran is ready to pull out all the stops in its response to the U.S.-Israeli barrage, which President Donald Trump says is aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. A full shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz would cause an international crisis given that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the narrow channel. Financial analysts estimate that even one day of a full blockade could cause global oil prices to double from $66 per barrel to more than $120.

keep readingShow less
What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means
Top image credit: FILE PHOTO: Afghan Taliban fighters patrol near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in Spin Boldak, Kandahar Province, following exchanges of fire between Pakistani and Afghan forces in Afghanistan, October 15, 2025. REUTERS/Stringer

What Pakistan's 'open war' on Taliban in Afghanistan really means

QiOSK

Pakistan’s airstrikes on Kabul and Kandahar over the last 24 hours are nothing new. Islamabad has carried out strikes inside Afghanistan several times since the Taliban’s return to power. Pakistan claimed that the Afghan Taliban used drones to conduct strikes in Pakistan.

What distinguishes this latest episode is the rhetorical escalation, with Pakistani officials openly referring to the action as “open war.” While the language grabbed international headlines, it is best understood as part of a managed escalation designed to signal resolve without crossing red lines that would make de-escalation impossible.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.