Follow us on social

google cta
2018-09-28t125954z_1628816840_rc1effa19800_rtrmadp_3_un-assembly

Top UAE officials named in illegal US influence operation

The Emiratis continue their illicit campaigns undermining American democracy without consequence.

Analysis | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

In July, the head of Donald Trump’s inaugural committee and a top campaign fundraiser, Tom Barrack, was indicted for “unlawful efforts to advance the interests of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in the United States at the direction of senior UAE officials.” The indictment made clear that this included work by Barrack and his co-defendants to directly influence foreign policy positions of the Trump administration in the UAE’s favor.

What was not clear from the indictment was who were the senior UAE officials directing this illicit influence operation. That changed on Tuesday when Bloomberg revealed that those “UAE officials” are actually the very pinnacle of the UAE government, including the UAE’s Ambassador to the United States, Yousef al Otaiba, and even the UAE’s de facto leader, Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed Bin Zayed, or MBZ.

While its extraordinary to learn that the head of a foreign autocracy was directing an illicit influence operation, this is far from the first time the UAE has been caught illegally meddling in America.

Just two weeks ago, three former U.S. intelligence operatives admitted to working as cyber spies for the UAE, hacking into U.S. computer networks, and giving the UAE unauthorized access to “tens of millions of smartphones and mobile devices,” in the United States, according to the Justice Department. The cyber spies’ operation, known as Project Raven, also targeted journalists and human rights activists in the Middle East, some of whom were later tortured by UAE security forces.

While MBZ was directing Barrack and his co-defendants’ influence operation, he was also personally guiding another operation to gain influence in Washington. At MBZ’s direction George Nader — an adviser to MBZ and Donald Trump, who is now in prison on child pornography charges — ran what the DOJ called a “conduit campaign” to conceal the true source of more than $3.5 million in illegal campaign donations. The campaign was initially focused on gaining access and influence within the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. But, after Trump’s victory in the 2016 election, the UAE’s focus quickly shifted to Trump, beginning with a $1 million illegal donation to his inauguration.

In addition to this illicit campaign contribution scheme, Nader also orchestrated a covert campaign, to vilify the UAE’s rival Qatar in Washington. After receiving $2.5 million from Nader, Trump fundraiser Elliott Broidy bankrolled two anti-Qatar conferences hosted by D.C. think tanks. This was just a small part of an immense push by the UAE to gain sway in Washington policy circles. In fact, no dictatorship gives more money to D.C. think tanks than the UAE — and that’s just the money that can be tracked. The UAE often covertly funds think tanks, like the Broidy/Nader Qatar campaign and a “secret” $20 million contribution to the Middle East Institute.

What has all this money bought? Silence. As my colleague and I previously documented in Responsible Statecraft, in the weeks after the Tom Barrack indictment was released, the think tanks that receive funding from the UAE said nothing about a foreign power running an illicit operation to influence major U.S. foreign policy decisions. Similarly, no Biden administration official has condemned the UAE for any of these transgressions.

This silence is a threat to U.S. national security, as it invites more interference in American democracy.

The United States, and especially President Biden, must send a clear message to the UAE that meddling in American democracy is unacceptable. This should start now as President Biden’s national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, is scheduled to visit the UAE this week. Sullivan must, at the very least, let the Emirati government know it cannot continue to undermine U.S. policy and politics without consequences. Those consequences can and should include canceling a proposed $23 billion arms sale to the UAE, that includes advanced weaponry like armed drones and F-35 fighter aircraft. As arms sales experts have repeatedly warned, the UAE has a history of letting U.S. weapons fall into the hands of al-Qaida and Iranian linked militants in Yemen.

If Washington continues to do nothing and does not hold foreign autocrats — even those that are allegedly our “friends” — accountable for meddling in American democracy it will only inspire more malign influence operations.


United Arab Emirates Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan (L) listens alongside United Arab Emirates Ambassador to the U.S. Yousef Al Otaiba to U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (not pictured) speak while attending a Gulf Cooperation Council summit on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, U.S. September 28, 2018. REUTERS/Darren Ornitz
google cta
Analysis | Washington Politics
A House of Dynamite
Top image credit: RELEASE DATE: October 24, 2025 TITLE: A House of Dynamite STUDIO: Netflix DIRECTOR: Kathryn Bigelow PLOT: When a single, unattributed missile is launched at the United States, a race begins to determine who is responsible and how to respond. STARRING: A House of Dynamite. Gabriel Basso as Deputy National Security Advisor Jake Baerington. ZUMA Press Wire via Reuters Connect

You have 19 minutes to decide whether to kill tens of millions

Media

WARNING: This article contains spoilers.

What if you were the president of the United States and you had just minutes to decide how to respond to an impending nuclear attack?

keep readingShow less
Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi
Top photo credit: Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi 首相官邸 (Cabinet Public Affairs Office)

Takaichi 101: How to torpedo relations with China in a month

Asia-Pacific

On November 7, Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi stated that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could undoubtedly be “a situation that threatens Japan’s survival,” thereby implying that Tokyo could respond by dispatching Self-Defense Forces.

This statement triggered the worst crisis in Sino-Japanese relations in over a decade because it reflected a transformation in Japan’s security policy discourse, defense posture, and U.S.-Japan defense cooperation in recent years. Understanding this transformation requires dissecting the context as well as content of Takaichi’s parliamentary remarks.

keep readingShow less
Starmer, Macron, Merz G7
Top photo credit: Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and António Costa, President of the European Council at the G7 world leaders summit in Kananaskis, June 15, 2025. Picture by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street

The Europeans pushing the NATO poison pill

Europe

The recent flurry of diplomatic activity surrounding Ukraine has revealed a stark transatlantic divide. While high level American and Ukrainian officials have been negotiating the U.S. peace plan in Geneva, European powers have been scrambling to influence a process from which they risk being sidelined.

While Europe has to be eventually involved in a settlement of the biggest war on its territory after World War II, so far it’s been acting more like a spoiler than a constructive player.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.