Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1182946162-scaled

Trump's point man on Syria joins Biden-linked consulting firm

The former official helped steer US policy in Syria away from fighting ISIS and toward countering Iran and Russia.

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The Trump administration’s point man on Syrian affairs is now working part-time for a consulting firm with links to the Biden administration.

Ambassador James Jeffrey had been the face of some of the Trump administration’s most controversial Middle East policies as the State Department’s special envoy to Syria. He’s been working “in a 1099 capacity” at WestExec Advisors since January 2021, a spokesperson for the firm confirmed by email.

WestExec was founded by several Obama administration alumni, a number of whom now serve in high-level Biden administration roles. Its co-founder, Antony Blinken, is now Secretary of State, while former WestExec principal Avril Haines serves as Director of National Intelligence.

Jeffrey, a former career diplomat with decades of service under both Democratic and Republican administrations, came out of retirement to take over the Trump administration’s Syria policy in 2018.

During Jeffrey’s tenure, U.S. policy shifted from fighting the Islamic State to counteracting Russian and Iranian influence in the region. After urging Syrian Kurdish-led forces to dismantle their fortifications along the border in exchange for U.S. protection, the Trump administration gave a tacit green light for Turkey to invade in October 2019.

“I feel bad for your career because that is no way to end an honorable career, defending the indefensible,” Rep. Gerry Connolly (D–Va.) told Jeffrey during a hearing that month.

Jeffrey also made controversial statements shortly after retiring from the Trump administration. He claimed to have played “shell games” to keep the true number of U.S. forces in Syria hidden from the president — which former national security adviser John Bolton also bragged about — and referred to an offshoot of al-Qaida as an “asset” to U.S. regional strategy.

But it appears that Jeffrey is back in Washington’s good graces. He’s now working at WestExec, a firm that is well-connected — too-well connected, according to critics — to powerful Democratic circles.

In addition to his part-time consulting position, Jeffrey serves as chairman of the Middle East program at the prestigious Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. And he’s had numerous media hits over the past few months.

“Look around the Middle East among America’s friends and partners in Ankara, Cairo, Jerusalem, Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, Doha, Kuwait City, Amman. Tell me anybody who’s happy to see the Trump administration go,” Jeffrey told the Times of Israel in December. “All of the front-line countries around the world were happy with what Trump actually did.”


Dear RS readers: It has been an extraordinary year and our editing team has been working overtime to make sure that we are covering the current conflicts with quality, fresh analysis that doesn’t cleave to the mainstream orthodoxy or take official Washington and the commentariat at face value. Our staff reporters, experts, and outside writers offer top-notch, independent work, daily. Please consider making a tax-exempt, year-end contribution to Responsible Statecraftso that we can continue this quality coverage — which you will find nowhere else — into 2026. Happy Holidays!

New York, NY - September 18, 2018: US Ambassador James Jeffrey Special Representative for Syria presides at Security Council meeting on situation in Middle East Syria at United Nations Headquarters (photo: lev radin via shutterstock.com)
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
What use is a mine ban treaty if signers at war change their minds?
Top image credit: Voodison328 via shutterstock.com

What use is a mine ban treaty if signers at war change their minds?

Global Crises

Earlier this month in Geneva, delegates to the Antipersonnel Mine Ban Treaty’s 22nd Meeting of States Parties confronted the most severe crisis in the convention’s nearly three-decade history. That crisis was driven by an unprecedented convergence of coordinated withdrawals by five European states and Ukraine’s attempt to “suspend” its treaty obligations amid an ongoing armed conflict.

What unfolded was not only a test of the resilience of one of the world’s most successful humanitarian disarmament treaties, but also a critical moment for the broader system of international norms designed to protect civilians during and after war. Against a background of heightened tensions resulting from the war in Ukraine and unusual divisions among the traditional convention champions, the countries involved made decisions that will have long-term implications.

keep readingShow less
The 8 best foreign policy books of 2025
Top image credit: Dabari CGI/Shutterstock

The 8 best foreign policy books of 2025

Media

I spent the last few weeks asking experts about the foreign policy books that stood out in 2025. My goal was to create a wide-ranging list, featuring volumes that shed light on the most important issues facing American policymakers today, from military spending to the war in Gaza and the competition with China. Here are the eight books that made the cut.

keep readingShow less
Why Russians haven't risen up to stop the Ukraine war
Top image credit: People walking on Red square in Moscow in winter. (Oleg Elkov/Shutterstock)

Why Russians haven't risen up to stop the Ukraine war

Europe

After its emergence from the Soviet collapse, the new Russia grappled with the complex issue of developing a national identity that could embrace the radical contradictions of Russia’s past and foster integration with the West while maintaining Russian distinctiveness.

The Ukraine War has significantly changed public attitudes toward this question, and led to a consolidation of most of the Russian population behind a set of national ideas. This has contributed to the resilience that Russia has shown in the war, and helped to frustrate Western hopes that economic pressure and heavy casualties would undermine support for the war and for President Vladimir Putin. To judge by the evidence to date, there is very little hope of these Western goals being achieved in the future.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.