Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1369418663-scaled

China’s evolving relationship with the Middle East

The Belt and Road Initiative is the key link to China’s growing investment in the region--but what does it mean?

Analysis | Asia-Pacific

China’s relationship with the Middle East has been fraught with contradictions since the end of World War II. Initially the Middle East was of peripheral importance to China. Now the region ranks higher in Beijing’s strategic calculations. Beijing’s role there has the potential to produce a strategic shift in the region’s political, economic, and military orientation.

The path from 1949 to the present has been tortuous. China’s core national interests in the Persian Gulf have been fourfold: not having any single power dominating; preventing the emergence of anti-Chinese governments; opposing any formal support for Taiwan independence; and gaining the support of Gulf countries for China’s foreign policy.

China established diplomatic relations with Baghdad in 1958, a month after the Iraq revolution, giving China for the first time a foothold in the Gulf region. Nevertheless, it took China 32 more years to gain diplomatic relations with all eight Gulf countries.

After the 1967 war, the Arab countries pinned their hopes to the Soviet Union, and Sino-Iraqi relations cooled. China’s emphasis briefly switched to support for revolutionary movements in the Gulf. However, by 1971 Beijing had shifted its focus to opposing Soviet expansionism and cultivating better relations with Washington.

For the next two decades, China’s approach to the Gulf was bedeviled by Arab-Persian antagonism, exacerbated by the Iran’s Islamic Revolution in 1979 and the Iran-Iraq war from 1980-1988. When Saudi Arabia established diplomatic relations with Beijing in 1990, China for the first time had diplomatic ties with all eight Gulf countries.

Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in August 1990 posed a severe challenge to China’s Gulf policy, highlighting the contradiction between China’s interests with the United States and Iran. Deng Xiaoping’s concept of maintaining a low profile kept China’s focus on the Asia-Pacific region. In the Middle East, China sought compromises with the United States on issues of primary importance to Washington, limiting China’s relationship with Iran.

The end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union made the Middle East far more important for China. The newly independent states of Central Asia became targets for the expansion of Iranian, Turkish, and Saudi influence. The northwestern region of China now bordered on newly independent countries that were the object of competition among regional countries and great powers like the United States. Beijing began treating the region as a “strategic extension” (战略延伸) of China’s neighboring area. However, the Gulf Cooperation Council countries were hesitant to develop closer relations with Beijing, fearing that China’s domestic political system might suffer the same fate as the Soviet Union.

The 9/11 attacks confronted China with a new set of problems in the Gulf, where its strategic focus shifted to Saudi Arabia and Iran. Beginning in 2005, Saudi King Abdullah displayed interest in improving relations with China. Beijing welcomed this but viewed Saudi Arabia as dependent on U.S. security guarantees, something Beijing could not provide. This limited how far China was prepared to go with the Saudis. Strategically, Beijing considered the rise of Iran the most profound event in the Middle East in the beginning of the 21st century, but Beijing’s Iranian policy was constrained by the antagonism between Tehran and Washington.

China is now faced with numerous frustrations in dealing with the Gulf. The region had again been upgraded in China’s strategy to a “greater neighboring area” (大周边). However, Saudi Arabia and Iran were competing for leadership in the region, with many irreconcilable differences. These contradictions led some Chinese analysts to conclude that Beijing’s approach to the Gulf was not serving China’s core national interests.

Over the last decade, other vitally important factors came into play, including Xi Jinping’s determination to assert Chinese leadership on a global stage; the launching in 2013 of China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative: the crisis between Russia and NATO in 2014 over Ukraine, which forced Russia to acquiesce in China’s expanding role in Central Asia and the Middle East, and the deterioration in U.S.-China relations that reduced Chinese incentives to avoid actions detrimental to U.S. interests.

Xi Jinping signaled his intention to give greater attention to the Middle East in a speech to the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum in 2014, using the Belt and Road Initiative as the vehicle for expanded collaboration. In preparation for Xi’s visit to Tehran in 2016, China issued an Arab Policy Paper setting out China’s vision for the region. At the conclusion of the visit, China and Iran issued a Joint Statement establishing a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership.

China now has comprehensive strategic partnerships with Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, the UAE and Algeria, signifying relationships of particular importance to Beijing. It also has a comprehensive innovation partnership with Israel, a strategic cooperation relationship with Turkey, and strategic partnerships with Iraq, Morocco, Sudan, Djibouti, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman, and Qatar.

Iran continues to loom large in China’s Gulf policy. Beijing opposed U.S. withdrawal from the Iran nuclear agreement, as well as Washington’s decision unilaterally to reimpose sanctions on Iran that had been lifted in 2016. Nevertheless, its companies and financial institutions have been wary of taking actions in Iran that would run afoul of U.S. sanctions, and it has not invested heavily in the country.

China has been opportunistic in selling arms into the Middle East. These sales are increasing but are still minimal in comparison with other arms suppliers. Beijing has the potential to be a wild card, however, through its willingness to sell drones, ballistic missiles, and other advanced military technologies to selective countries.

China has also been cautious about taking on security responsibilities in the region. China backed the Russian-proposed collective security concept for the Gulf, but for the moment this is more rhetorical than practical. Its naval support facility in Djibouti remains its sole overseas base. China has avoided taking sides on contentious issues in the region and values its status as a potential mediator in disputes.

The flagship of China’s regional involvement is still its Belt and Road Initiative through which it has poured tens of billions of dollars in investments into countries throughout the Middle East. For the moment these investments are centered on economic and infrastructure projects, but China’s projects in transportation and communication links, as well as ports and refineries, will serve Beijing’s longer-range strategic interests. The United States has nothing comparable.

China’s role in the Middle East and the Gulf is a work in progress. The region’s importance to China as an energy supplier is now well-established in China’s thinking, and China has become an important factor in the strategic calculations of regional countries. These trends are significant because they point toward the possibility of a comprehensive geopolitical shift in the Middle East in which China could be an important component.

This article is a condensation of remarks by the author to the Iran Forum on September 30, 2020.


Photo: Matias Lynch / Shutterstock.com
Analysis | Asia-Pacific
iraqi protests iran israel
Top photo credit: Iraqi Shi'ite Muslims hold a cutout of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they attend a protest against Israeli strikes on Iran, in Baghdad, Iraq, June 16, 2025. REUTERS/Ahmed Saad

Iraq on razor's edge between Iran and US interests in new war

Middle East

As Israeli jets and Iranian rockets streak across the Middle Eastern skies, Iraq finds itself caught squarely in the crossfire.

With regional titans clashing above its head, Iraq’s fragile and hard-won stability, painstakingly rebuilt over decades of conflict, now hangs precariously in the balance. Washington’s own tacit acknowledgement of Iraq’s vulnerable position was laid bare by its decision to partially evacuate embassy personnel in Iraq and allow military dependents to leave the region.

This withdrawal, prompted by intelligence indicating Israeli preparations for long-range strikes, highlighted that Iraq’s airspace would be an unwitting corridor for Israeli and Iranian operations.

Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ al-Sudani is now caught in a complicated bind, attempting to uphold Iraq’s security partnership with the United States while simultaneously facing intense domestic pressure from powerful, Iran-aligned Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) factions. These groups, emboldened by the Israel-Iran clash, have intensified their calls for American troop withdrawal and threaten renewed attacks against U.S. personnel, viewing them as legitimate targets and enablers of Israeli aggression.

keep readingShow less
George Bush mission accomplished
This file photo shows Bush delivering a speech to crew aboard the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, as the carrier steamed toward San Diego, California on May 1, 2003. via REUTERS

Déjà coup: Iran war activates regime change dead-enders

Washington Politics

By now you’ve likely seen the viral video of an Iranian television reporter fleeing off-screen as Israel bombed the TV station where she was recording live. As the Quincy Institute’s Adam Weinstein quickly pointed out, Israel's attack on the broadcasting facility is directly out of the regime change playbook, “meant to shake public confidence in the Iranian government's ability to protect itself” and by implication, Iran’s citizenry.

Indeed, in the United States there is a steady drumbeat of media figures and legislators who have been loudly championing Israel’s apparent desire to overthrow the regime of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

keep readingShow less
Ukraine NATO
Top photo credit: August 2024 -- Led by the United Kingdom and involving trainers from 12 other countries, Operation Interflex gives Ukrainian recruits a five-week crash course in everything from infantry tactics to combat first aid, preparing them to defend their homeland. . (NATO/Flickr)

How NATO military doctrine failed Ukraine on the battlefield

Europe

The war in Ukraine has raged for over three years. As ceasefire talks loom, major European NATO members including Germany, UK, France and Denmark are planning to protect any future armistice by sending their troops as peacekeepers in a “Coalition of the Willing.”

Their goal is to deter the Russians from restarting the war. Unfortunately, deterrence comes from combat capability. Without it there is no deterrence at all. That capability is in question. NATO equipment and doctrine was developed for the Cold War and tested in the mountains of Afghanistan. It has not been tested in conventional war and needs to absorb lessons from the Ukraine war to offer a military option to the European elites, independent of the United States.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.