Follow us on social

google cta
Shutterstock_1681947994-scaled

A global ceasefire amid COVID-19: Necessary but not sufficient

Lockdowns are not only aggravating conflict around the world, but they're also making it more difficult for local peacebuilders to make key connections to mitigate it.

Analysis | Washington Politics
google cta
google cta

United Nations Secretary General António Guterres called for a global ceasefire on March 23 so the world to focus on the COVID-19 pandemic. While only a handful of countries have picked up the call, hundreds of nongovernmental organizations and local civil society groups are working to make it a reality.

Ceasefires bring hope to end catastrophic violence and humanitarian crises around the world. A recent consultation on how COVID-19 has been affecting peacebuilding with more than 400 local experts from over 60 countries found that the pandemic and the response to it are exacerbating violence and conflict. Ongoing armed violence contributes to further spread of the virus.

Ceasefires provide a vital pause in conflicts that could help mitigate both violence and the spread of the virus. It also brings an opportunity to begin a peace process to address the root causes of conflict and put an end to the violence. A global ceasefire will not be easy to achieve, but it is not out of the question. It will take a holistic approach with the international community, national governments, and local communities.

The report of the consultation published by Peace Direct, Conducive Space for Peace, and Humanity United shows there are opportunities for ceasefires to succeed and to build sustainable peace.

Local peacebuilders are on the front lines to end violence in their communities and to spread awareness of COVID-19. They understand the complexities of the conflict taking place in their communities and can respond to the pandemic with conflict sensitivity to not exacerbate underlying root causes for violence. But many of them do not have the resources they need to succeed.

Shifting funding away from peacebuilding to focus only on COVID-19 puts many vulnerable communities at risk. Many countries and armed militias are taking advantage of the war time rhetoric used by the United States and other countries to counter the spread of the pandemic to extend power and close civic spaces like freedom of speech, press, and assembly. Moreover, stay-at-home measures have closed many businesses and government agencies, which have  resulted in an increase in criminality and violence that exacerbate underlying causes of conflict. These measures have already seen a drastic rise in domestic violence.

Boaz Mukaramoja, a peacebuilder from Kenya, explains, “Now the government offices are partially functional, the courts are closed down and the local administration is also partially working. So, this is aggravating the conflict because we are seeing a rise in theft cases in the rural areas. It is also difficult for peace builders to make any interventions because the government order of working from home.”

The World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention agree that COVID-19 will disproportionately affect poorer populations and nations, which underscores the importance of foreign aid from wealthier countries. But providing COVID-19 aid must be approached with sensitivity to the underlying conflicts in many parts of the world. The solution is supporting local actors who have comprehensive knowledge of conflict dynamics.

There is a growing trend of supporting local people to address the problems their community faces. Now more than ever is a time to invest into local people to enhance the skills and resources available to them to spread awareness about COVID-19 and to continue preventing violence to build sustainable peace which will continue long after the pandemic has been contained.

It is necessary for international, national, and local actors to work together in these unprecedented times to succeed in achieving a global ceasefire, but also to take the next steps to a more permanent resolution — and this process is not unprecedented. Indeed, national actors — like the Sudanese Professionals Association — and peacebuilders worked together in Sudan to oust Omar al-Bashir from power. The United States and the international community provided diplomatic pressure on the Transitional Military Council and aided the national actors and local peacebuilders to come to an agreement that will give power to the people of Sudan.

COVID-19 awareness is vital for national actors to curb the spread until a cure is found. National actors can provide the space necessary for local peacebuilders to operate. They can also work to prevent the spread of false or misleading information about the virus. International actors can support local peacebuilders with the resources they need to enhance their abilities and increase the chances for success.

When it comes to combatting COVID-19, peace works better. It will take a holistic approach of international, national, and local actors to contain COVID-19 and end violent conflict around the world. The ceasefire is necessary to curb the pandemic, but also provides the perfect time for people to unite and end violence altogether.


Medics check for signs of coronavirus infection from those coming to the southern city of Taiz in Yemen, March 24, 2020 (Photo credit: anasalhajj / Shutterstock.com)
google cta
Analysis | Washington Politics
Why Israeli counterterrorism tactics are showing up in Minnesota
Top photo credit: Federal police tackle and detain a person as demonstrators protest outside the Whipple federal building in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on January 16, 2026. (Photo by Steven Garcia/NurPhoto)

Why Israeli counterterrorism tactics are showing up in Minnesota

Military Industrial Complex

In the past few weeks, thousands of federal law enforcement officials have descended on Minneapolis. Videos show immigration officers jumping out of unmarked vans, tackling and pepper-spraying protesters, and breaking windows in order to drag people from their cars.

Prominent figures in the Trump administration have defended this approach despite fierce local backlash. When federal agents killed a protester named Alex Pretti on Saturday, for example, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem quickly accused him of “domestic terrorism.”

keep readingShow less
nuclear weapons
Top image credit: rawf8 via shutterstock.com

What will happen when there are no guardrails on nuclear weapons?

Global Crises

The New START Treaty — the last arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia — is set to expire next week, unless President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin make a last minute decision to renew it. Letting the treaty expire would increase the risk of nuclear conflict and open the door to an accelerated nuclear arms race. A coalition of arms control and disarmament groups is pushing Congress and the president to pledge to continue to observe the New START limits on deployed, strategic nuclear weapons by the US and Russia.

New START matters. The treaty, which entered into force on February 5, 2011 after a successful effort by the Obama administration to win over enough Republican senators to achieve the required two-thirds majority to ratify the deal, capped deployed warheads to 1,550 for each side, and established verification procedures to ensure that both sides abided by the pact. New START was far from perfect, but it did put much needed guardrails on nuclear development that reduced the prospect of an all-out arms race.

keep readingShow less
Trump Hegseth Rubio
Top image credit: President Donald Trump, joined by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan, announces plans for a “Golden Fleet” of new U.S. Navy battleships, Monday, December 22, 2025, at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. (Official White House Photo by Daniel Torok)

Trump's realist defense strategy with interventionist asterisks

Washington Politics

The Trump administration has released its National Defense Strategy, a document that in many ways marks a sharp break from the interventionist orthodoxies of the past 35 years, but possesses clear militaristic impulses in its own right.

Rhetorically quite compatible with realism and restraint, the report envisages a more focused U.S. grand strategy, shedding force posture dominance in all major theaters for a more concentrated role in the Western Hemisphere and Indo-Pacific. At the same time however, it retains a rather status quo Republican view of the Middle East, painting Iran as an intransigent aggressor and Israel as a model ally. Its muscular approach to the Western Hemisphere also may lend itself to the very interventionism that the report ostensibly opposes.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.