Follow us on social

Shutterstock_512559421-scaled

Bush and Obama eased sanctions on Iran during humanitarian crises, why isn't Trump?

Crippling U.S. sanctions are severely impeding Iranian efforts to combat the coronavirus, compelling Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif to ask the United Nations for help.

Analysis | Middle East

The coronavirus is fast spreading around the world and Iran is now one of the main epicenters of this pandemic. The virus first started to spread in the holy city of Qom, Iran’s main religious town that is located just 90 miles from Tehran. After neglecting and dismissing the danger of the outbreak at the beginning, Iranian officials have finally started to take the situation seriously. Schools and colleges have been closed for the next month, Friday prayers have been canceled, and people are encouraged to avoid public places and stay at home. But the virus still seems to be quickly spreading.

With over 11,000 cases confirmed across Iran and at least 514 dead, the outbreak is increasingly growing by the day and sources inside the country suggest that the actual numbers are much higher.

In many cities and provinces, hospitals are overcrowded with special-care units at full capacity. Iranian health workers, doctors, and nurses are working around the clock at the frontlines of the fight against the virus, risking their own lives in dealing with a shortage of essential supplies, medical equipment, and test kits. And U.S. economic sanctions imposed on Iran are one of the key reasons for the shortage of supplies.

The dire situation has now compelled Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif to send a letter to United Nations Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, asking for the immediate lifting of U.S. sanctions on Iran, saying they have made it virtually impossible for Iran to import medicine and medical equipment necessary to identify and treat coronavirus patients.

Although sanctions technically do not ban food, medicine, and humanitarian trade, many companies and banks are reluctant to engage in any business with Iran, particularly when hawkish groups in the U.S. engage in name-and-shame operations that are even directed at healthcare related industries.

Doctors and health officials in Iran, as well as international aid organizations have raised the alarm on how sanctions have limited Iran’s access to much-needed medical supplies to deal with the outbreak.

“The situation here is hard and we do what we can, but clearly sanctions have destroyed the ability of the domestic suppliers to procure internationally,” one international aid worker in Tehran told me, adding, “We need to be able to re-establish normal business links for the private sector at least for the medical items, as this is about the life and death of patients.”

In August 2012, after deadly earthquakes hit several villages in northwestern Iran, a bipartisan group of lawmakers urged then-President Barack Obama to ease sanctions on Iran to make sure humanitarian aid got to the Iranian people in their time of need. The Treasury Department issued a temporary license that allowed NGOs to transfer funds up to $300,000 to Iran to be used for humanitarian relief and reconstruction related to the earthquake.

In December 2003 a devastating earthquake in the ancient city of Bam in southern Iran killed thousands and injured many more. Then-President George W. Bush temporarily eased sanctions on Iran to allow humanitarian aid to get in, including supplies from the United States. Multiple U.S. military planes landed in Iran for the first time since the 1979 revolution and the subsequent hostage crisis that ended diplomatic ties between the two countries. The cargo planes transferred over 150,000 pounds of medical supplies and more than 200 civilian personnel from Boston, Los Angeles, and Fairfax County in Virginia, to assist Iran in search and rescue, emergency surgery, and disaster response coordination.

Since Donald Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal and imposed sanctions, Washington and Tehran have been on a collision course and the Trump administration has offered no such help to the Iranian people.

Pouya Alimagham, a historian at MIT, told me that if the goal was to sanction Iran until it accepts a better nuclear deal that includes its missile program and regional issues, then the Trump administration has achieved the opposite — increased Iranian uranium enrichment, missile launches against U.S. bases in Iraq by Iranian-linked militias after the U.S. assassination of General Qassem Soleimani earlier this year, and no change in Iranian foreign policy. Mr. Alimagham added that in fact, the two countries nearly started an all-out war over Soleimani's killing. In sum, the sanctions have been a total failure, and have exacted an immeasurable toll on regular Iranians — a toll that has now been compounded with the new coronavirus outbreak.

The current pandemic could provide an opportunity for President Trump to make a humanitarian gesture towards Iran. He should ease sanctions to allow aid and medical supplies to get into Iran in order to help contain the epicenter of the disease in the Middle East and slow one of the largest outbreaks of this deadly virus. This may open the door for future dialogue that could finally get Tehran and Washington out of this impasse.


Photo credit: Gabriel Petrescu / Shutterstock.com
Analysis | Middle East
Recep Tayyip Erdogan Benjamin Netanyahu
Top photo credit: President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan (Shutterstock/ Mustafa Kirazli) and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Salty View/Shutterstock)
Is Turkey's big break with Israel for real?

Why Israel is now turning its sights on Turkey

Middle East

As the distribution of power shifts in the region, with Iran losing relative power and Israel and Turkey emerging on top, an intensified rivalry between Tel Aviv and Ankara is not a question of if, but how. It is not a question of whether they choose the rivalry, but how they choose to react to it: through confrontation or peaceful management.

As I describe in Treacherous Alliance, a similar situation emerged after the end of the Cold War: The collapse of the Soviet Union dramatically changed the global distribution of power, and the defeat of Saddam's Iraq in the Persian Gulf War reshuffled the regional geopolitical deck. A nascent bipolar regional structure took shape with Iran and Israel emerging as the two main powers with no effective buffer between them (since Iraq had been defeated). The Israelis acted on this first, inverting the strategy that had guided them for the previous decades: The Doctrine of the Periphery. According to this doctrine, Israel would build alliances with the non-Arab states in its periphery (Iran, Turkey, and Ethiopia) to balance the Arab powers in its vicinity (Iraq, Syria, and Egypt, respectively).

keep readingShow less
Havana, Cuba
Top Image Credit: Havana, Cuba, 2019. (CLWphoto/Shutterstock)

Trump lifted sanctions on Syria. Now do Cuba.

North America

President Trump’s new National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) on Cuba, announced on June 30, reaffirms the policy of sanctions and hostility he articulated at the start of his first term in office. In fact, the new NSPM is almost identical to the old one.

The policy’s stated purpose is to “improve human rights, encourage the rule of law, foster free markets and free enterprise, and promote democracy” by restricting financial flows to the Cuban government. It reaffirms Trump’s support for the 1996 Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, which explicitly requires regime change — that Cuba become a multiparty democracy with a free market economy (among other conditions) before the U.S. embargo will be lifted.

keep readingShow less
SPD Germany Ukraine
Top Photo: Lars Klingbeil (l-r, SPD), Federal Minister of Finance, Vice-Chancellor and SPD Federal Chairman, and Bärbel Bas (SPD), Federal Minister of Labor and Social Affairs and SPD Party Chairwoman, bid farewell to the members of the previous Federal Cabinet Olaf Scholz (SPD), former Federal Chancellor, Nancy Faeser, Saskia Esken, SPD Federal Chairwoman, Karl Lauterbach, Svenja Schulze and Hubertus Heil at the SPD Federal Party Conference. At the party conference, the SPD intends to elect a new executive committee and initiate a program process. Kay Nietfeld/dpa via Reuters Connect

Does Germany’s ruling coalition have a peace problem?

Europe

Surfacing a long-dormant intra-party conflict, the Friedenskreise (peace circles) within the Social Democratic Party of Germany has published a “Manifesto on Securing Peace in Europe” in a stark challenge to the rearmament line taken by the SPD leaders governing in coalition with the conservative CDU-CSU under Chancellor Friedrich Merz.

Although the Manifesto clearly does not have broad support in the SPD, the party’s leader, Deputy Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil, won only 64% support from the June 28-29 party conference for his performance so far, a much weaker endorsement than anticipated. The views of the party’s peace camp may be part of the explanation.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.