Follow us on social

google cta
Bill White Belgium

US diplomat accuses Belgian officials of anti-semitism on X

Another ambassador with questionable experience, Bill White also took to social media to lambaste his host country for not liking his 'great president'

Analysis | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

A number of Donald Trump's ambassadors have very questionable experience for the jobs they are doing. That is not unusual — presidents throughout history have given out posts as favors for fundraising or other political or personal supports. The problem with some of these diplomats is they seem to forget they actually have a job to do — and it's not ingratiating the boss by insulting his host country because they think that is what the boss wants to hear.

Case in point: Bill White, who worked for and ran a museum for the USS Intrepid before quitting abruptly amid a pay-for-pay state pension scandal for which he eventually paid a $1 million settlement in 2010. He used to raise money for Democrats. Then he shifted to raising money for Trump in 2016 and was installed as Trump's ambassador to Belgium four months ago. It's not going so well.

White lashed out a Belgian health officials for charging three Jewish Mohels (physicians) for allegedly performing circumcisions on babies without medical training. It's none of his business, officially, but he accused the health officials of anti-Semitism yesterday in an X post and demanded that they be left alone. The three Mohels in question have become the focus of an "emergency campaign" for religious freedom by the Combat Antisemitism Movement and other pro-Jewish and and pro-Israel organizations close to the president's orbit, so this isn't quite coming out of nowhere. Yet White's attempt to mimic Trump is rather absurd. Here is the full post:

According to the Washington Post, White has been summoned by the Belgian foreign minister Maxine Prévot. “Personal attacks against a Belgian minister and interference in judicial matters violate basic diplomatic norms,” Prévot said.

“Mister Ambassador,” lawmaker Kjell Vander Elst posted. “As a member of parliament, elected by the Belgian People, my free advice to you: MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS.”

U.S. ambassadors represent the foreign policies of the president and the U.S. Department of State in other capitals. During Democratic administrations, Republicans attacked American officials working overseas who appeared to be pursuing "woke causes" like trans rights in other countries. Much of this was the fodder for the dismantling foreign aid in the second Trump administration. One might ask how White's interference in another country's domestic judicial process is any different.

But not all "rogue ambassadors" appear to be ideological. Tom Rose, the U.S. Ambassador to Poland just cut off ties with the Speaker of parliament because he did not support Trump's Nobel eace prize aspirations. This was also announced on X.

Tom Rose was a senior advisor and political strategist for Vice President Pence during the first Trump administration. Before that he was a conservative radio show host and editor of the Jerusalem Post in Israel, where he lived for 10 years, from 1997 to 2005. He has been Trump's ambassador to Poland for a year.


Top photo credit: US ambassador to Belgium Bill White talks to the press after a meeting at the offices of the Foreign Affairs department of the Federal Government in Brussels, Tuesday 17 February 2026. BELGA PHOTO MARIUS BURGELMAN
google cta
Analysis | QiOSK
Dan Caine
Top photo credit: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Air Force Gen. Dan Caine conduct a press briefing on Operation Epic Fury at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., March 4, 2026. (DoW photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Alexander Kubitza)

Did Caine just announce the Morgenthau option for Iran?

QiOSK

Gen. Dan Caine’s formulation of American war aims in Iran is remarkable not because it is bellicose, but because it is strategically incoherent.

In a press conference Tuesday morning, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff did not describe a limited campaign to suppress missile fire, blunt Iran’s naval threat, or even impose a severe but bounded setback on Tehran’s coercive instruments. He described a campaign against Iran’s “military and industrial base” designed to prevent the regime from attacking Americans, U.S. interests, and regional partners “for years to come.” In an earlier briefing he put the objective similarly: to prevent Iran from projecting power outside its borders. Rather than the language of a discrete coercive operation, this describes a war against a state’s capacity to regenerate power.

keep readingShow less
Mbs-mbz-scaled
UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan receives Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Presidential Airport in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates November 27, 2019. WAM/Handout via REUTERS

Is the US goading Arab states to join war against Iran?

QiOSK

On Sunday, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz told ABC News that Arab Gulf states may soon step up their involvement in the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. “I expect that you'll see additional diplomatic and possibly military action from them in the coming days and weeks,” Waltz said.

Then, on Monday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) slammed Saudi Arabia for staying out of the war even as “Americans are dying and the U.S. is spending billions” of dollars to conduct regime change in Iran. “If you are not willing to use your military now, when are you willing to use it?” Graham asked. “Hopefully this changes soon. If not, consequences will follow.”

keep readingShow less
Why Tehran may have time on its side
Top image credit: Iranian army military personnel stand at attention under a banner featuring an image of an Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) during a military parade commemorating the anniversary of Army Day outside the Shrine of Iran's late leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in the south of Tehran, Iran, on April 18, 2025. (Photo by Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto)

Why Tehran may have time on its side

QiOSK

A provocative calculus by Anusar Farrouqui (“policytensor”) has been circulating on X and in more exhaustive form on the author’s Substack. It purports to demonstrate a sobering reality: in a high-intensity U.S.-Iran conflict, the United States may be unable to suppress Iranian drone production quickly enough to prevent a strategically consequential period of regional devastation.

The argument is framed through a quantitative lens, carrying the seductive appeal of mathematical precision. It arranges variables—such as U.S. sortie rates and degradation efficiency against Iranian repair cycles and rebuild speeds—to suggest a "sustainable firing rate." The implication is that Iran could maintain a persistent strike capability long enough to exhaust American political patience, forcing Washington toward a premature declaration of success or an unfavorable ceasefire.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.