Follow us on social

google cta
Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.)

Senate vote fails, giving Trump free rein on Iran war

The final tally was close, but only one Republican, Senator Rand Paul, supported the congress's authority to approve military force

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

Today, the Senate narrowly blocked a war powers resolution, which would have halted ongoing and unauthorized U.S. military hostilities against Iran.

The resolution, sponsored by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), and co-sponsored by 26 other Senators, failed to advance in a 47-53 vote, where most Democrats have voted for the legislation, and Republicans largely voted against it. (The vote, originally 47-52, was held briefly to wait for Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) to return from a trip from Texas to vote. He then voted against the resolution.)

The exception among the Democrats was Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), who voted against the resolution, as he said he would. Among Republicans, the lone exception was Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

A war powers resolution in January aimed at halting hostilities with Venezuela garnered a number of Republicans, including — Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Todd Young (R-Ind.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), and Susan Collins (R-Maine), but none of them voted for today’s resolution.

On the floor leading up to the vote, resolution supporters stressed the human costs of the conflict with Iran, and asserted that Congress must be able to decide when the U.S. goes to war.

“This resolution is about stopping that war, but it is also about reasserting Congress's vital role as a check on the executive and the abuse of the authority to bring a nation to war,” Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said. “This is about whether the American people, through their elected representatives, will have a say when their sons and daughters are put in harm's way. When the resources of this country are diverted away from their communities, and towards the building of bombs and weapons and engagement in another, potentially endless foreign war.”

“In Iran, hundreds have died, including more than 100 school girls — children. They are blameless. Hospitals have been bombed, shopping malls and homes have been hit,” Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said. “If Trump will not rule out boots on the ground, then this Congress needs to. We have a constitutional responsibility when it comes to war.”

“There is no congressional authorization on the books that would authorize this military action, and, as my colleagues have amply demonstrated, the administration and their shifting set of rationales — and even in a classified setting, could produce no evidence, none that the U.S. was under an imminent threat of attack from Iran,” Sen. Kaine said.

“We can't afford to hide under a desk and let any president, Democrat or Republican, send our best and brightest — our own kids — into war to risk their lives, unless we have debated it, we have determined it's in the national interest, we have voted, and thereby put our signature and our thumbprint, on the notion that it's worth sending our best and brightest to risk their lives," he said.

The House of Representatives will vote on a war powers resolution tomorrow, introduced by Reps. Khanna (D-Calif.) and Massie (R-Ky.), to remove the U.S. from unauthorized hostilities “in the Islamic Republic of Iran” before the U.S. can attack it again.

But an alternative House war powers resolution, introduced earlier this week by Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), and drafted by several Democratic representatives, stands to counter the Khanna-Massie legislation. Aimed at preventing a hasty withdrawal from hostilities amid ongoing military operations, it proposes that Trump end hostilities with Iran within 30 days unless Congress authorizes the war. It would also allow the U.S. to maintain “a troop presence in the region for defensive purposes.”

It is unclear how much support Rep. Gottheimer’s resolution will receive in the House. It is likely the Khanna-Massie resolution will fail.

The U.S. announced “Operation Epic Fury” after it and Israel attacked Iran over the weekend, killing Iran’s leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, in the process — without consulting the entire Congress. Iran retaliated with attacks on Israel and myriad U.S. bases in the Middle East, and the conflict has expanded since.


Top Image Credit: [Screenshot/live.senate.gov]
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Colby: Israel is fighting a different war in Iran
Top image credit: Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby speaks at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee. (Screengrab via armed-services.senate.gov)

Colby: Israel is fighting a different war in Iran

QiOSK

The U.S. is pursuing “scoped and reasonable objectives” in its military campaign against Iran and is not seeking regime change through force, argued Undersecretary of Defense Elbridge Colby in a Tuesday Senate hearing.

When pressed about why the campaign began with the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, Colby declined to comment directly. “I’m talking about the goals of the American military campaign,” he told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Those are Israeli operations.”

keep readingShow less
US missiles
Top photo credit: . DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Vince Parker, U.S. Air Force.

Trump: We have 'unlimited' weapons to fight 'forever' war

QiOSK

In a startling Truth Social post overnight on Monday, President Donald Trump defied reality and claimed that U.S. weapons were "unlimited" and the U.S. could fight "forever" with "these supplies."


keep readingShow less
West Bank
Top image credit: Israeli soldiers search a young Palestinian man during a security operation in the Askar refugee camp. Feb 22. 2026, Nasser Ishtayeh / SOPA Images via Reuters Connect

With focus on Iran and Gaza, Israel is quietly annexing the West Bank

Middle East

Israel’s new war with Iran coupled with slaughter in the Gaza Strip — where Israeli military operations have killed more than 600 Palestinians since a “ceasefire” supposedly went into effect last October, adding to the tens of thousands killed during the previous two years — has diverted attention from events in the West Bank.

That diversion is fine with those intent on cementing Israeli control there and continuing the subjugation or displacement of the 3.8 million Palestinians who live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.