Follow us on social

google cta
Vatican quietly steps up role in US-Cuba talks

Vatican quietly steps up role in US-Cuba talks

The Holy See is hoping to revive its place as a key mediator between Washington and Havana

Analysis | Latin America
google cta

As the Trump administration and its allies ramp up pressure on Havana following deadly bombing campaigns in Caracas and Tehran, an interlocutor that for decades has mediated turbulent U.S.-Cuba ties is re-emerging as a potential facilitator of a bilateral deal: the Vatican.

On Thursday, Cuba’s foreign ministry announced the release of 51 prisoners in anticipation of Holy Week, crediting the “close and fluid relations between the Cuban state and the Vatican.” The move came just days after Vatican Secretary of State Pietro Parolin said the Holy See had taken the “necessary steps” to ensure a “negotiated solution” between the two countries, and just over a week after Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla was received by Pope Leo XIV. These talks followed a recent meeting in Rome between a senior U.S. diplomat and the Holy See’s equivalent of a foreign minister.

The news of a potential Vatican-mediated backchannel, which neither the U.S. nor Cuba has officially confirmed, comes as President Trump has been floating a “friendly takeover”“or not” — of Cuba. Meanwhile, as USA Today revealed, the White House is preparing a "surprise economic deal” with Cuba that could include a relaxation of restrictions on Americans' ability to travel to the island, as well as deals related to ports, energy, and tourism infrastructure. Limited sanctions relief is also reportedly on the table, according to sources who spoke with USA Today.

In exchange, Cuba could provide an offramp for Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel — whom U.S. officials see as an obstacle to ongoing talks — to gracefully step aside while allowing members of the powerful Castro family to remain on the island. These provisions, which Cuban officials appear open to, could lower bilateral tensions and advance the Trump administration’s interests in the Caribbean.

The possibility of an agreement, which would avoid bloodshed, state collapse and mass migration, comes at a fortuitous moment. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has long sought regime change in Havana, has seemingly backed off from pushing for immediate political changes on the island. Late last month, he said that gradual economic reform could offer a path forward to improve bilateral ties.

Other positive signs include a recent decision to allow fuel sales to Cuba’s private sector amid a de facto oil blockade, as well as the delivery of $9 million in humanitarian aid through the Catholic Church. While these moves are far from enough to mitigate the devastating impacts of Trump’s maximum pressure squeeze, they underscore the administration’s apparent concerns about provoking a humanitarian disaster and regime collapse just off the coast of Florida in an election year.

In recent weeks, Cuban authorities have seemingly responded positively to the Trump administration’s signals by legalizing public-private partnerships and floating serious economic reforms and an increased role for the country’s private sector.

Meanwhile, the State Department’s Coordinator for Cuban Affairs recently visited the island to meet with Catholic leaders and discuss the distribution of humanitarian aid, though it remains unclear if he held talks with his Cuban government counterparts as part of what the Miami Herald reported was an expected “formal meeting between Cuban government officials and officials in the U.S. State Department” on February 28.

Cuban authorities deny that talks are occurring beyond informal “exchanges of messages,” but they have reiterated their readiness to engage in a more formal setting. President Trump, for his part, says on a near-daily basis that Secretary Rubio is talking to high-ranking Cuban leaders. At a recent summit in Florida, Trump told a group of heads of state that “they are negotiating with Marco, and myself, and some others.”

According to the Miami Herald and Axios, Rubio’s State Department advisers have met with the grandson of former Cuban president Raúl Castro, most recently on the sidelines of last month’s CARICOM Summit in St. Kitts and Nevis, as well as with others in Castro’s inner circle, which Cuban authorities have not denied, but called “speculation.”

At that summit, many Caribbean countries expressed their preference for a negotiated solution, with Jamaican Prime Minister Andrew Holness saying, “This moment calls for…constructive dialogue, particularly between Cuba and the United States, to ease tensions and promote reform and stability.” Some regional leaders, such as Mexico's Claudia Sheinbaum, have offered to serve as mediators for U.S.-Cuba talks, while others, notably Colombia’s Gustavo Petro, have apparently tried to send oil to the island. But upcoming elections in both Colombia and neighboring Brazil, along with Trump’s penchant for retaliation, have subdued any greater regional efforts to deter further escalation in tensions with the U.S.

This fear was on full display last week, when—despite Holness’ message of reconciliation—both Jamaica and Guyana caved to U.S. pressure by canceling a decades-old program to contract Cuban medical professionals, a major component of those countries’ healthcare systems and a source of revenue to Cuba’s that the U.S. considers “state-sponsored human trafficking.”

In that sense, it remains unclear what the administration’s strategy is toward Cuba—if there even is one. On the one hand, it supposedly seeks to make the island dependent on the U.S. by controlling the levers of fuel, dollars and other resources entering the country’s private sector, while simultaneously looking into the possibility of leveling criminal charges against the island’s authorities and choking off revenues to a public sector responsible for healthcare, education, public transportation, trash collection, and electricity generation.

Yet broad U.S. sanctions and internal divisions within the Trump administration have deterred U.S. executives from endorsing the administration’s plans. “Everyone's deathly afraid that the administration will be supportive in the morning and by lunchtime will be criticizing them,” John Kavulich of the U.S.-Cuba Trade and Economic said.

For now, a Vatican-led mediation may be the best off-ramp for both governments to resolve their differences while keeping the well-being of the Cuban people front and center.

During the final days of the Biden administration, the Vatican helped facilitate an agreement that led to the release of 533 prisoners from Cuban jails, the removal of Cuba from the U.S. state sponsor of terrorism list, the elimination of a State Department “Cuba Restricted List,” and the suspension of a provision in a 1996 law that allowed U.S. firms to sue in U.S. court any entity allegedly trafficking in property nationalized following the Cuban Revolution.

The Vatican also played a key role in the Obama administration’s secret negotiations with Cuba in 2013-14, with Pope Francis in particular encouraging President Obama to pursue reconciliation with Havana and advance dialogue at the urging of two Catholic cardinals, Archbishop of Havana, Jaime Ortega, and Archbishop of Boston, Sean O’Malley.

Pope Francis’ personal involvement helped break an impasse during those negotiations, and a U.S. official later said that a meeting at the Vatican coordinated by Secretary Parolin to finalize the breakthrough deal was fundamental in building confidence in both sides to overcome lingering distrust and sustain their respective ends of the bargain.

After that, Pope Francis visited the island in 2015, which was welcomed by the Cuban people and helped consolidate a more constructive relationship between the Cuban government and the Catholic Church.

Despite Pope Francis’ death last April, his successor—who has visited the island in the past and possibly even has Cuban roots—appears willing to pick up where Francis left off.

“I [invite] all those responsible to promote sincere and effective dialogue, in order to avoid violence and any action that could increase the suffering of the beloved Cuban people,” Pope Leo XIV said last month.


Top image credit: At the Embassy of Italy to the Holy See Palazzo Borromeo, in the presence of the highest institutional authorities of the Italian Republic and the Holy See, the 97th anniversary of the Lateran Pacts and the 42nd anniversary of the Agreement revising the Concordat are commemorated. Pictured is Pietro Parolin Secretary of State of the Holy See. Rome, 17 February 2026.
Analysis | Latin America
As Iran war rages, Washington opens a new front in Ecuador
Top image credit: Ecuadoran security forces patrol the streets of Manta, Ecuador. (IMAGO/Agencia Prensa-Independiente via Reuters Connect)

As Iran war rages, Washington opens a new front in Ecuador

Latin America

As the world’s attention is focused on the U.S. and Israeli war on Iran, the United States has, with little fanfare, opened another front in its expanding campaign against so-called “narco-terrorism” in the Western Hemisphere.

Since this campaign began last year, U.S. military strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats, as well as a direct military intervention in Venezuela, have claimed the lives of more than 250 people. Now, Ecuador, a country on the northwestern edge of South America, has become the latest site of Washington’s reinvigorated “war on drugs.” This escalation risks making the United States complicit in the human rights abuses of a government that is steadily dismantling its own country’s democracy, including by suspending the nation’s largest opposition party.

keep reading Show less
Israel’s push for Somaliland base raises fears of wider war
Top image credit: Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar and Somaliland President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi participate in a joint press conference during Saar's visit to Somaliland on January 6, 2026. (Screengrab via X)

Israel’s push for Somaliland base raises fears of wider war

QiOSK

Bloomberg reported Wednesday that Israel is in talks with Somaliland officials to form a strategic security partnership, which might include granting Israel access to a military base or other security installation along the Somaliland coast from which it can launch attacks against Yemen’s Houthi rebels.

With war raging in the Middle East, the Horn of Africa is a particularly important geoeconomic and geopolitical puzzle piece. Its location near the Bab el-Mandeb strait, which connects ships traveling through the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean, makes it a strategic location from the perspective of global shipping, 10% to 12% of which travels through the strait annually.

keep reading Show less
Most Iranian Americans want diplomacy with Iran: poll
Iranian-Americans in the age of Trump, the Travel Ban, and the Threat of War

Most Iranian Americans want diplomacy with Iran: poll

QiOSK

Recent data released by the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) suggests that a strong majority of Iranian Americans support diplomacy to resolve tensions between the U.S. and Iran — a finding at odds with the dominant conversation online suggesting that most Iranian Americans are in favor of the Iran war.

The data was collected through a survey of 505 Iranian Americans conducted by Zogby Analytics between Feb. 27 and March 5. Among the most notable results were that a clear majority of Iranian Americans — 61.6% — support diplomacy to move toward de-escalation and a negotiated path forward.

keep reading Show less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.