Follow us on social

google cta
Trump designates 3 branches of Muslim Brotherhood as terror groups

Trump designates 3 branches of Muslim Brotherhood as terror groups

The move will send shockwaves across the Middle East, where the organization has deep roots

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The Trump administration designated several branches of the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist organizations in a move that will send shockwaves across the Middle East.

“The United States will use all available tools to deprive these Muslim Brotherhood chapters of the resources to engage in or support terrorism,” said Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a statement.

The decision comes just a month after President Trump instructed the State Department to consider issuing designations against Muslim Brotherhood branches in Jordan, Egypt and Lebanon. The policy appears tailored to slow down calls on the right to designate the entire Muslim Brotherhood as a terror group — a move that national security experts say would fuel extremism among moderate members of the group while diverting resources away from dealing with more violent groups, like al-Qaida or ISIS.

The move drew praise from hawkish analysts on the right. Mariam Wahba of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies called Trump’s decision “the most robust and consequential effort to tackle the growing threat posed by the world's largest and most potent Islamist organization.” The Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy lauded the move and promised to “continue to brief policymakers” on its research about the organization and “on policy options for addressing the Muslim Brotherhood's long-term strategy.”

FDD and ISGAP played a crucial role in advancing the push to designate the Muslim Brotherhood, alongside officials and lobbyists representing Israel and the UAE, as RS reported last month.

The policy shift draws distinctions between different branches of the organization. The U.S. now considers the Lebanese Muslim Brotherhood a foreign terrorist organization, meaning that its backers can be criminally prosecuted if they provide “material support” to the group. (The administration has accused Lebanon’s Muslim Brotherhood of firing rockets at Israel in recent years.) Trump used a slightly less restrictive designation for the Egyptian and Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood affiliates, naming them as “specially designated global terrorists,” a move that cuts off their members from the global banking system.

The impact of the designation will largely come down to how aggressively the Trump administration enforces the policy. The Muslim Brotherhood refers to a loose umbrella of Islamist groups inspired by the teachings of Islamic scholar Hassan al-Banna, who founded the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood in 1928. Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated groups have followed diverse paths in the ensuing century, with some forming moderate political parties, like in Tunisia, while others took up armed struggle, like Hamas. But many of them have maintained some form of contact with other Muslim Brotherhood groups — a fact that could now expose them to serious legal liability.

The decision will complicate U.S. relations with some of its allies in the Middle East, some of which are active supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood, including Qatar and Turkey. “For other governments where the brotherhood is tolerated, it would be a thorn in bilateral relations,” Nathan Brown, a professor of political science at George Washington University, told AP News.

Critics also say the move could bolster efforts by authoritarian governments to crack down on political opposition parties. Egypt banned its local Muslim Brotherhood branch after a military junta deposed the country’s democratically elected Islamist president in a bloody coup in 2013. Jordan, for its part, banned a Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated political party in 2025 after it won roughly a third of seats in the Jordanian House of Representatives in 2024. As Raed Jarrar of DAWN told RS last month, “it's a free gift that authoritarian regimes would use to stifle freedom of expression and political organizing in the Middle East and North Africa.”


Top photo credit: President Donald Trump signs two executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on Thursday, January 30, 2025. The first order formally commissioned Christopher Rocheleau as deputy administrator of the FAA. The second ordered an immediate assessment of aviation safety. Photo by Bonnie Cash/Pool/Sipa USA
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
G7 Summit
Top photo credit: May 21, 2023, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan: (From R to L) Comoros' President Azali Assoumani, World Trade Organization (WTO) Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan. (Credit Image: © POOL via ZUMA Press Wire)

Middle Powers are setting the table so they won't be 'on the menu'

Asia-Pacific

The global order was already fragmenting before Donald Trump returned to the White House. But the upended “rules” of global economic and foreign policies have now reached a point of no return.

What has changed is not direction, but speed. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s remarks in Davos last month — “Middle powers must act together, because if we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu” — captured the consequences of not acting quickly. And Carney is not alone in those fears.

keep readingShow less
Vice President JD Vance Azerbaijan Armenia
U.S. Vice President JD Vance gets out of a car before boarding Air Force Two upon departure for Azerbaijan, at Zvartnots International Airport in Yerevan, Armenia, February 10, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/Pool

VP Vance’s timely TRIPP to the South Caucasus

Washington Politics

Vice President JD Vance’s regional tour to Armenia and Azerbaijan this week — the highest level visit by an American official to the South Caucasus since Vice President Joe Biden went to Georgia in 2009 — demonstrates that Washington is not ignoring Yerevan and Baku and is taking an active role in their normalization process.

Vance’s stop in Armenia included an announcement that Yerevan has procured $11 million in U.S. defense systems — a first — in particular Shield AI’s V-BAT, an ISR unmanned aircraft system. It was also announced that the second stage of a groundbreaking AI supercomputer project led by Firebird, a U.S.-based AI cloud and infrastructure company, would commence after having secured American licensing for the sale and delivery of an additional 41,000 NVIDIA GB300 graphics processing units.

keep readingShow less
United Nations
Monitors at the United Nations General Assembly hall display the results of a vote on a resolution condemning the annexation of parts of Ukraine by Russia, amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City, New York, U.S., October 12, 2022. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado||

We're burying the rules based order. But what's next?

Global Crises

In a Davos speech widely praised for its intellectual rigor and willingness to confront established truths, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney finally laid the fiction of the “rules-based international order” to rest.

The “rules-based order” — or RBIO — was never a neutral description of the post-World War II system of international law and multilateral institutions. Rather, it was a discourse born out of insecurity over the West’s decline and unwillingness to share power. Aimed at preserving the power structures of the past by shaping the norms and standards of the future, the RBIO was invariably something that needed to be “defended” against those who were accused of opposing it, rather than an inclusive system that governed relations between all states.

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.