Follow us on social

Shutterstock_2252996863-scaled

NATO foray into Asia risks driving China and Russia closer together

A new Tokyo bureau will be the first of its kind, further cementing the alliance’s shift toward the region.

Asia-Pacific

NATO plans to open a liaison office in Japan to coordinate relations with Tokyo and other friendly powers in the Indo-Pacific, according to a new report from Nikkei Asia.

The office, which will be the first of its kind in the region, represents a notable step in NATO’s shift toward confronting China, which officially began last year when the alliance formally identified Beijing as a threat. 

As the Guardian noted, the move is likely to further increase tensions between the West and China, which has often expressed concern over potential NATO inroads in Asia. It also risks driving concerns from alliance members that favor a less confrontational approach with Beijing, according to George Beebe of the Quincy Institute.

“When you go out of area, you're going to inevitably raise concerns inside the alliance about what the alliance's priorities ought to be,” Beebe argued, noting that the office could “exacerbate differences between the United States and some Europeans about how to deal with China.”

It remains unclear who will pay for the office. According to Nikkei, the one-person bureau, which is expected to open next year, will lead periodic consultations between NATO and its Pacific partners, including Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, and Australia.

The decision to open the office highlights Japan’s interest in deepening cooperation with NATO. Notably, Tokyo also plans to open a separate diplomatic mission to NATO in Belgium in order to further promote its ties with the alliance.

In recent years, NATO has also stood up liaison offices in Ukraine, Georgia, Kuwait, and Moldova.

As Professor Michito Tsuruoka of Keio University told Nikkei, the move emphasizes NATO’s view that China and Russia are becoming increasingly close. “In addition to the problems China poses by itself, a new dimension has been added: that of China as a supporter of Russia. This now becomes directly related to Europe's security,” Tsuruoka said.

But Beebe worries that these concerns could turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy. “There's a grave risk that NATO moving into Asian Affairs is likely to bring Russia and China even closer together into what could amount to a de facto alliance between the two of them against what they see as a common Western or NATO enemy,” he said. “I don't think that's in the interest of the United States or Europe to encourage.”

(Shutterstock/ Andy.LIU)
Asia-Pacific
Diplomacy Watch: Is new Ukraine aid a game changer?

Diplomacy Watch: Is new Ukraine aid a game changer?

QiOSK

When the Ukraine aid bill hit President Joe Biden’s desk Wednesday, everything was already in place to speed up its impact. The Pentagon had worked overtime to prepare a massive, $1 billion weapons shipment that it could start sending “within hours” of the president’s signature. American officials even pre-positioned many of the arms in European stockpiles, an effort that will surely help get the materiel to the frontlines that much faster.

For Ukraine, the new aid package is massive, both figuratively and literally. Congress authorized roughly $60 billion in new spending related to the war, $37 billion of which is earmarked for weapons transfers and purchases. The new funding pushes Washington’s investment in Ukraine’s defense to well over $150 billion since 2022.

keep readingShow less
Israel violating US and international law, ex officials say

Israel Defense Forces (IDF) troops ground operation in Gaza on Nov 12, 2023. (IDF handout via EYEPRESS via Reuters)

Israel violating US and international law, ex officials say

Middle East

Israel’s attacks in Gaza reflect a “systematic disregard for fundamental principles of international law” and “raise grave concerns regarding the [Biden] Administration’s compliance with both U.S. and international law,” according to an explosive new report from a prominent group of former U.S. officials and legal scholars.

“The Israeli government [has] demonstrated a clear pattern of negligent targeting along this campaign, [as well as] indifference and callousness to civilian harm and suffering and a disregard for international law,” Wes Bryant, an Air Force master sergeant and a targeting expert who contributed to the report, said during a Wednesday press conference.

keep readingShow less
What are Americans' biggest foreign policy priority?
gopixa via shutterstock.com
gopixa via shutterstock.com

What are Americans' biggest foreign policy priority?

Global Crises

Americans give higher priority to countering the power and influence of Russia and China and finding a solution to the conflict between Israel and Palestinians than they did six years ago, according to a new survey released Tuesday by the Pew Research Center.

Conversely, policies aimed at promoting human rights, protecting refugees, and strengthening the United Nations are not as compelling to many citizens as they were in 2018, according to the survey, which was conducted during the first week of April.

keep readingShow less

Israel-Gaza Crisis

Latest